图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2014 , Vol. 58 >Issue 21: 111 - 115

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.21.016

情报研究

NSP:一种作者评价指标及其与H指数之比较

  • 张学梅
展开
  • 苏州市职业大学图书馆
张学梅,苏州市职业大学图书馆馆员,E-mail:dew29@sina.com。

收稿日期: 2014-08-22

  修回日期: 2014-10-16

  网络出版日期: 2014-11-07

基金资助

本文系苏州市图书馆学会课题"科学计量学理论与方法在定题服务中的应用研究"(项目编号:14-C-12)研究成果之一。

收起

A Method for Authors Evaluation-NSP and Comparison with H-index

  • Zhang Xuemei
Expand
  • Suzhou Vocational University Library, Suzhou 215104

Received date: 2014-08-22

  Revised date: 2014-10-16

  Online published: 2014-11-07

Fold

摘要

介绍由M.Kosmulski提出的成功论文概念以及一种以计算成功论文篇数为基础的作者评价方法——NSP方法,并总结该方法与H指数方法的异同。以我国图书情报学领域100名作者为例,分别计算出每人近10年间的NSP与H指数,并对结果加以分析,讨论变化原因,当多人分数相同时,可通过对作者合著情况加以控制来提高区分度,最后分析NSP与H指数各自的适用范围及NSP的潜在局限性。

关键词： NSP; 作者评价; 成功论文; 学术评价; H指数

本文引用格式

张学梅 . NSP:一种作者评价指标及其与H指数之比较[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(21) : 111 -115 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.21.016

Abstract

Kosmulski Marke proposes the notion of successful paper and NSP which is a method based on calculating successful papers to evaluate authors' academic impact, and summarizes the similarities and differences compared with H index. Taking 100 authors in the domain of library and information in China as an example, the NSP and H index are separately calculated, the result and reason are analyzed. When more authors have the same scores, the differentiation degrees can be improved by considering the coauthoring. At last, the extent of application of NSP and H index are discussed and the limitations of NSP are studied.

Key words： NSP; authors evaluation; successful paper; academic evaluation; H index

参考文献

[1] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. PNAS,2005,102(46): 16569-16572.

[2] Kosmulski M.Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011,87 (5): 481-485.

[3] Gregory D W,Peter K J,Tatiana O S. Hot topics and popular papers in evolutionary psychology: Analyses of title words and citation counts in evolution and human behavior, 1979-2008[J]. Evolutionary Psychology, 2009,7(3):348-362.

[4] Bornmann L. Scientific peer review[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2011,45(1):197-245.

[5] Fiorenzo F, Maurizio G, Domenico M, et al.The success-index: An alternative approach to the h-index for evaluating an individual's research output[J]. Scientometrics, 2012,92 (3): 621-641.

[6] Fiorenzo F, Maurizio G, Domenico M, et al. An informetric model for the success-index[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(1):109-116.

[7] Fiorenzo F, Domenico M,Luca M. The citer-success-index: A citer-based indicator to select a subset of elite papers[J]. Scientometrics, 2014,101(2):963-983.

[8] 周春雷.h指数的潜在缺陷——h指数精确注水问题研究[J].图书情报工作,2008,52(8):112-114,65.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉