图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2014 , Vol. 58 >Issue 22: 5 - 11

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.22.001

理论研究

基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建

  • 由庆斌 ,
  • 韦博 ,
  • 汤珊红
展开
  • 1. 中国国防科技信息中心;
    2. 北京科技大学科学技术与文明研究中心;
    3. 北京大学信息管理系
由庆斌,中国国防科技信息中心硕士研究生,E-mail:853113737@qq.com;韦博,北京科技大学科学技术与文明研究中心硕士研究生,中国国防科技信息中心工程师;汤珊红,北京大学信息管理系博士研究生,中国国防科技信息中心副研究员.

收稿日期: 2014-09-17

  修回日期: 2014-10-22

  网络出版日期: 2014-11-20

收起

Evaluation Model Construction to Evaluate Article's Influence Based on Altmetrics

  • You Qingbin ,
  • Wei Bo ,
  • Tang Shanhong
Expand
  • 1. China Defense Science and Technology Information Center, Beijing 100142;
    2. Research Center for Science Technology and Civilization, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083;
    3. Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received date: 2014-09-17

  Revised date: 2014-10-22

  Online published: 2014-11-20

Fold

摘要

提出构建基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型.收集Mendeley平台中提供的指标数据,利用相关分析法筛选补充计量指标,对筛选得到的指标进行主成分分析,找出主成分因子并建立主成分评价模型.最后,对比主成分评价模型与引用评价模型的评价结果,发现两个模型对高学术影响力论文的评价具有一定的一致性.

关键词： 补充计量学; 替代计量学; 相关性分析; 主成分分析; 影响力

本文引用格式

由庆斌 , 韦博 , 汤珊红 . 基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(22) : 5 -11 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.22.001

Abstract

This paper proposes to build an evaluation model to evaluate article's influence based on altmetrics. It collects indicators data from Mendeley platform, takes advantage of related analysis method to filter altmetrics indicators, and makes principal component analysis on these altmetrics indicators. Then it finds the principal component factors and develops principal component evaluation model. At last, it compares the results between the principal component evaluation model and citation evaluation model, and finds that both of them have some consistency in evaluating the high influence articles.

Key words： altmetrics; correlation analysis; principal component analysis; influence

参考文献

[1] Buschman M, Michalek A. Are alternative metrics still alternative?[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 39(4): 35-39.

[2] MacRoberts M H, MacRoberts B R. Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(1): 1-12.

[3] Yan K K, Gerstein M. The spread of scientific information:Insights from the Web usage statistics in PLoS article-level metrics[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(5): e19917.

[4] Uren V, Dadzie A S. Relative trends in scientific terms on Twitter [EB/OL]. [2014-09-08].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/uren-v0/.

[5] Desai T, Shariff A, Shariff A, et al. Tweeting the meeting: An in-depth analysis of Twitter activity at Kidney Week 2011[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(7): e40253.

[6] William G, Jan R. Social metrics for research:Quantity and quality[EB/OL]. [2014-09-08].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/gunn/.

[7] Li Xuemei, Thelwall M. F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators[EB/OL].[2014-09-08].http://2012.sticonference.org/Proceedings/vol2/Li_F1000_541.pdf.

[8] Li Xuemei, Thelwall M, Giustini D. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 461-471.

[9] Bar-Ilan J, Haustein S, Peters I, et al. Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social Web [EB/OL]. [2014-09-08]. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1205/1205.5611.pdf.

[10] Torres D, Cabezas Á, Jiménez E. Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in Web 2.0[J]. Comunicar, 2013, 21(41):53-60.

[11] 刘春丽, 何钦成. 不同类型选择性计量指标评价论文相关性研究——基于Mendeley、F1000 和 Google Scholar 三种学术社交网络工具[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(2): 206-212.

[12] Eysenbach G. Can Tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact[EB/OL].[2014-09-08].http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278109/.

[13] Cabezas-Clavijo Á, Torres-Salinas D. Indicadores de uso y participación en lasrevistascientíficas 2.0:El caso de PLoS One[J]. El Profesional de la Información, 2010, 19(4): 431-434.

[14] Shuai Xin, Pepe A, Bollen J. How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads,Twitter mentions, and citations[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e47523.

[15] Priem J, Piwowar H A, Hemminger B M. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact[EB/OL].[2014-09-08]. http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/priem/.

[16] Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, et al. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social Web services[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e64841.

[17] Costas R, Zahedi Z, Wouters P. Do altmetrics correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective[EB/OL].[2014-09-08].http://www.cwts.nl/pdf/CWTS-WP-2014-001.pdf.

[18] 主成分分析[OL]. [2014-09-08].http://baike.baidu.com/view/45376.htm?fr=aladdin.

[19] 肯德尔和谐系数[OL]. [2014-09-08].http://baike.baidu.com/view/4414728.htm.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉