综述述评

非专利引文分析研究进展

  • 陈凯 ,
  • 徐峰 ,
  • 程如烟
展开
  • 中国科学技术信息研究所 北京 100038
陈凯(ORCID:0000-0002-6807-9451),硕士研究生;程如烟(ORCID:0000-0002-9011-9384),战略研究中心副主任,研究员,硕士.

收稿日期: 2015-01-21

  修回日期: 2015-02-19

  网络出版日期: 2015-03-05

Review on Development of Non-Patent References Research

  • Chen Kai ,
  • Xu Feng ,
  • Cheng Ruyan
Expand
  • Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038

Received date: 2015-01-21

  Revised date: 2015-02-19

  Online published: 2015-03-05

摘要

[目的/意义]了解非专利引文分析的研究进展,为后续研究提供借鉴和参考.[方法/过程]在介绍非专利引文相关概念和起源的基础上,对相关文献进行回顾并归纳总结,分别阐述非专利引文研究领域及其研究方法.[结果/结论]结果表明,基于非专利引文的研究主要集中在科学-技术关联和知识转移等领域;研究方法则主要包括定量指标方法、模型研究方法、网络计量方法.最后,指出非专利引文分析的特点和局限性,在此基础上,提出一些改进建议并对未来研究的发展进行讨论.

本文引用格式

陈凯 , 徐峰 , 程如烟 . 非专利引文分析研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(5) : 137 -144 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.05.021

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to understand the research progress of the Non-patent References (NPRs)and provide some references for the further research.[Method/process] Based on related concept and the origin of NPRs as well as systematic review on related papers, the research areas and methods are discussed in this paper. [Result/conclusion] In conclusion, the Linkage between Science and Technology and Knowledge Transfer are the most popular research areas based on the analysis of NPRs. The methods using NPRs are also summarized, including Quantitative Index, Modeling and Cybermetrics. Finally the characteristics and limitations of NPRs are described. Some suggestions and future research directions based on the current research are also briefly discussed in the paper.

参考文献

[1] 国家知识产权局. 专利引文[EB/OL].[2015-01-20].http://www.sipo.gov.cn/wxfw/zlwxxxggfw/zsyd/zlwxjczs/zlwxymcjs/201406/t20140630_973313.html.
[2] 陈亮,张志强,尚玮姣. 专利引文分析方法研究进展[J]. 现代图书情报技术,2013(S1):75-81.
[3] Meyer M.What is special about patent citations? differences between scientific and patent citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2000, 49(1):93-123.
[4] 科易网, 专利引文的类型及其作用介绍[EB/OL].[2015-01-20].http://news.k8008.com/html/201303/news_4012697_1.html.
[5] 王庆稳,邓小昭.专利引文分析及其应用研究[J].现代情报,2008,28(4):189-192.
[6] 张虎胆,杨冠灿,吴恒,等.审查员引文是否应作为专利引文"噪音"被剔除?[J].图书情报知识,2013(6):77-83.
[7] Carpenter M P, Cooper M, Narin F. Linkage between basic research literature and patents[J]. Research Management, 1980, 23(2): 30-35.
[8] Carpenter M P, Narin F. Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence[J]. World Patent Information, 1983, 5(3): 180-185.
[9] Collins P, Wyatt S. Citations in patents to the basic research literature [J].Research Policy,1988,17(2):65-74.
[10] Narin F, Noma E. Is technology becoming science?[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 7(3): 369-381.
[11] Narin F, Olivastro D. Status report: Linkage between technology and science[J]. Research Policy, 1992, 21(3): 237-249.
[12] Narin F. Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output[J]. Scientometrics, 1995, 34(3): 489-496.
[13] Breitzman A F, Narin F. Method and apparatus for choosing a stock portfolio, based on patent indicators: US,6175824B1[P]. 1999.
[14] Karki M M S. Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool[J]. World Patent Information, 1997, 19(4): 269-272.
[15] Van Vianen B G, Moed H F, Van Raan A F J. An exploration of the science base of recent technology[J]. Research Policy, 1990, 19(1): 61-81.
[16] Schmoch U. Indicators and the relations between science and technology[J]. Scientometrics, 1997, 38(1): 103-116.
[17] Ellwein L B, Kroll P, Narin F. Linkage between research sponsorship and patented eye-care technology[J]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1996, 37(12):2495-2503.
[18] Narin F, Hamilton K S, Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science[J]. Research Policy, 1997, 26(3): 317-330.
[19] Narin F, Hamilton K S. Bibliometric performance measures[J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 36(3): 293-310.
[20] Narin F.Inventing our future-the link between Australian patenting and basic science [R]. Haddon Heights: CHI Research Inc,2000.
[21] Anderson J, Williams K, Seemungal D, et al. Human genetic technology: Exploring the links between science and innovation[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1996, 8(2): 135-156.
[22] McMillan G S, Narin F, Deeds D L. An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(1): 1-8.
[23] Lo S S. Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: A case of genetic engineering research[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(1): 109-120.
[24] Meyer M. Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy: The case of a small economy[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(2): 425-439.
[25] Ribeiro L C, Ruiz R M, Bernardes A T, et al. Matrices of science and technology interactions and patterns of structured growth: Implications for development[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(1): 55-75.
[26] 刘立, 王耀德. 从专利引文看公共科学对技术创新的重要作用[J]. 科学学研究, 2003, 21(4): 428-432.
[27] 文晓芬.基于专利引文的我国基础研究与技术创新的关联分析[D].北京:中国科学技术信息研究所,2011.
[28] 赵志耘,雷孝平.我国生物科技领域技术创新与基础研究关联分析——从专利引文分析的角度[J].情报学报,2012,31(12):1283-1289.
[29] 殷媛媛. 基于论文专利引证关系的科学技术互动研究——以立体显示为实证分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(16): 65-70.
[30] Meyer M. Patent citations in a novel field of technology—What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology?[J]. Scientometrics, 2000, 48(2): 151-178.
[31] Meyer M. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(3): 409-434.
[32] Van Looy B, Magerman T, Debackere K. Developing technology in the vicinity of science: An examination of the relationship between science intensity (of patents) and technological productivity within the field of biotechnology[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 70(2): 441-458.
[33] 李睿.基于专利引文分析的科学-技术关联探测模型改进[D].北京:中国科学院文献情报中心,2011.
[34] 李睿,肖恒,容军凤,等.试论"科学关联"计量指标的不足及改进——双向引用信息融合视角[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(8):6-10.
[35] 裴云龙, 蔡虹, 赵皎卉. 纳米科学对纳米技术的影响: 基于 NPR 的分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2010, 29(10): 1-4.
[36] 卞雅莉. 科学引文对企业专利质量的影响——以纳米材料产业为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(1): 50-54.
[37] Sorenson O, Fleming L. Science and the diffusion of knowledge[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(10): 1615-1634.
[38] Schmoch U.Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicator[J].Scientometrics,1993,26(1):193-211.
[39] Verbeek A, Debackere K, Luwel M. Science cited in patents: A geographic "flow" analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2): 241-263.
[40] Park H W, Kang J. Patterns of scientific and technological knowledge flows based on scientific papers and patents[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 811-820.
[41] 李永嘉.共性技术专利测度及特征分析[D].北京:中国科学技术信息研究所,2012.
[42] 吴曼.基于科学计量的知识生产与技术开发时间关联分析[D].北京:中国科学技术信息研究所,2013.
[43] 赵黎明,高扬,韩宇.专利引文分析在知识转移机制研究中的应用[J].科学学研究, 2002(3): 297-300.
[44] 赵黎明,李海霞,韩宇,等.基于数据挖掘的专利引文研究与知识发现[J].预测,2002,21(6):6-9,5.
[45] 韩宇.知识转移及其分析方法研究[D].天津:天津大学,2004.
[46] Noyons E C M, Van Raan A F J, Grupp H, et al. Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine research[J]. Research Policy, 1994, 23(4): 443-457.
[47] Liaw Yi-Ching, Chan Te-Yi, Fan Chin-Yuan, et al. Can the technological impact of academic journals be evaluated? The practice of non-patent reference (NPR) analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2014,101(1): 1-21.
[48] Chen C M L, Su Hsin-Ning, Lee Pei-Chun. Does non-patent reference measure university-industry collaboration?[C]//Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET), 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12. New York: IEEE, 2012: 1049-1053.
[49] Guan Jiancheng, He Ying. Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science-technology linkages[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(3): 403-425.
[50] Callaert J, Van Looy B, Verbeek A, et al. Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 3-20.
[51] Verbeek A, Debackere K, Luwel M, et al. Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(3): 399-420.
[52] Hu Daning, Chen Hsinchun, Huang Zan, et al. Longitudinal study on patent citations to academic research articles in nanotechnology (1976-2004)[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2007, 9(4): 529-542.
[53] Chen C, Hicks D. Tracing knowledge diffusion[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(2): 199-211.
[54] 李睿,孟连生.专利引文分析法与共词分析法在揭示科学-技术知识关联方面的差异对比[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(6):91-93,140.
[55] 裴云龙,蔡虹,王晓南,等.中外科学文献对中国高新产业技术创新质量的影响——基于专利的科学引文的分析[J].情报学报,2013,32(12):1333-1344.
[56] 高霞,官建成. 非专利引文衍生的科学期刊共被引网络分析[J].科学学研究,2010(5): 675-680,696.
[57] 高继平,丁堃,滕立,等.专利-论文混合共被引分析法的实现及其应用——以德温特专利数据库为例[J].情报学报,2012,31(3):317-324.
[58] 吴菲菲, 黄鲁成, 石媛螈. 基于文献和专利相互引用的科学与技术关系分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34(10): 13-20.
[59] Tijssen R J W.Science dependence of technologies: Evidence from inventions and their inventors[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(4): 509-526.
[60] Callaert J, Grouwels J, Van Looy B. Delineating the scientific footprint in technology: Identifying scientific publications within non-patent references[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 383-398.
[61] Criscuolo P,Verspage B.Does it matter where patent citations come from?Inventorvs examiner citationsin european patents[J].ResearchPolicy,2008,37(10):1892-1908.

文章导航

/