综述述评

国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究进展(2005-2014)

  • 裴成发 ,
  • 温芳芳
展开
  • 山西大学经济与管理学院 太原 030006
温芳芳(ORCID:0000-0002-2022-9764),助理馆员,硕士研究生,E-mail:wenfangf@126.com;裴成发(ORCID:0000-0001-9149-6475),教授,硕士生导师

收稿日期: 2015-06-27

  修回日期: 2015-07-16

  网络出版日期: 2015-08-05

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目"基于信息生态的信息资源协同建设研究"(项目编号:14BTQ039)研究成果之一。

Research Progress on Development Institution of Information Resources of Library Consortium Abroad (2005-2014)

  • Pei Chengfa ,
  • Wen Fangfang
Expand
  • School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006

Received date: 2015-06-27

  Revised date: 2015-07-16

  Online published: 2015-08-05

摘要

[目的/意义]揭示2005-2014年国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究的内容,为我国该主题的研究提供借鉴。[方法/过程]采用文献调研方法,从信息资源采集、组织、保存和共享4个方面分析该主题研究现状。[结果/结论]研究发现:国外研究重视联盟资源建设的顶层设计;将合作性的馆藏规划和馆藏发展政策的研究置于重要地位;研究立足于更广阔的视野。未来的研究应注重:开展联盟资源建设制度的系统性研究;理论界、业界与政府进行三方合作,探索联盟资源建设的地区、国家和国际框架;因时制宜、因地制宜地发展联盟资源建设制度。

本文引用格式

裴成发 , 温芳芳 . 国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究进展(2005-2014)[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(15) : 122 -132 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.15.017

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The study aims to explore the research contents of development institution of information resources of library consortium abroad, to provide reference for the theory and practice research about such topic in China. [Method/process] By means of literature survey, research progress on four main topics ofcollection, organization, preservation and sharing are revealed. [Result/conclusion] Three distinct enlightenments of the research are revealed: library consortiums abroad emphasis on top level design of information resources development, put highlight on the research of cooperative collection planning and collection development policy,and research based on broader perspective.Main points should be focused on in the future studies: carrying out a systematic study on the development institution of information resources, exploringthe regional, national and international frameworks of information resource development through the tripartite cooperation of theorists, practitioners and government,developing the development institution of information resource with the change of time and space.

参考文献

[1] Wu M M. Building a collaborative digital collection: A necessary evolution in libraries [J]. Law Library Journal, 2011, 103(4): 527-551.
[2] 戴龙基, 张红扬. 图书馆联盟——实现资源共享和互利互惠的组织形式[J].大学图书馆学报, 2000(3):36-39.
[3] Demas S, Miller M E. Rethinking collection management plans: Shaping collective collections for the 21stcentury[J]. Collective Management, 2012, 37(3/4):168-187.
[4] Urquhart C J, Cox A M, Spink S. Collaboration on procurement of e-content between the National Health Service and higher education in the UK[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2007, 35(7): 164-170.
[5] Ball D. Public libraries and the consortium purchase of electronic resources[J]. The Electronic Library, 2003, 21(4): 301-309.
[6] Missingham R. Electronic Resources Australia: A national approach to purchasing[J]. Library Management, 2009, 30(6/7): 444-453.
[7] Vogel K D. Integrating electronic resources into collection development policies[J]. Collection Management, 1996, 21(2):65-76.
[8] Olorunsola A, Adeleke A A. Electronic journals in Nigerian university libraries: The present situation and future possibilities [J]. Library Review, 2011, 60(7): 588-598.
[9] Johnson S, Evensen O G, Gelfand J, et al. Key issues for e-resource collection development: A guide for libraries[EB/OL]. [2015-04-05].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/acquisition-collection-development/publications/IFLA_ELECTRONIC_RESOURCE_GUIDE_DRAFT%20FOR%20COMMENT.pdf.
[10] Horava T. Today and in perpetuity: A Canadian consortial strategy for owning and hosting ebooks[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2013, 39: 423-428.
[11] Zhang Mei, Eschenfelder K R. License analysis of e-journal perpetual access[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2014, 40: 62-69.
[12] Davis K, Jin Lie, Neely C, et al. Shared patron-driven acquisition within a consortium: The OCUL PDA pilot[J]. Serials Review, 2012, 38(3): 183-187.
[13] Jill E, Bonnie P. The demand driven acquisitions pilot project by the Orbis Cascade Alliance: An interview with members of the demand driven acquisitions implementation team[J]. Serials Review, 2012, 38(2): 132-136.
[14] Doyle G. Oregon Cascade Alliance demand driven acquisitions ebook pilot[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].http://ala12.scheduler.ala.org/files/ala12/Doyle%20-%20Demand%20Driven%20Acquisitions.pdf.
[15] Shepherd J, Langston M. Shared patron driven acquisition of e-books in the California State University Library Consortium[J]. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 2013, 37(1/2): 34-41.
[16] Wiley L, Clarage E. Building on success: Evolving local and consortium purchase-on-demand programs[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(2): 105-110.
[17] Warner A. EBASS 25, Work package 5 - Procurement guidelines[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/file/5b85dab5-7bf4-7c7b-7731-b552f029e4ae/1/EBASS%2025%20Work%20Package%205%20Procurement%20Guidelines.pdf.
[18] Ebrary. Boston Library Consortium chooses ebrary and YBP library services for patron driven acquisition e-book pilot[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].http://www.ebrary.com/corp/newspdf/ebrary_YBP_BLC.pdf.
[19] Carrico S, Shelton T. A real challenge: Incorporating patron-driven acquisitions programs into collection development strategies and budgets[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24].http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2012/Collection/6/.
[20] Wiley L, Chrzastowski T E. A domestic monograph collection assessment in Illinois academic libraries: What are we buying and how is it used?[J]Interlending & Document Supply, 2011, 39(4): 167-175.
[21] Sarah P.The principle and the pragmatist: On conflict and coalescence for librarian engagement with open access initiatives[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2013, 39(1): 67-75.
[22] Cimen E. Future of resource sharing in Turkey: Can open access be an alternative?[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(3): 144-149.
[23] Karacsony G. HUNOR: The collaboration of Hungarian open access repositories[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 73: 57-61.
[24] Johnson P C. International open access week at small to medium U.S. academic libraries: The first five years[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2014, 40: 626-631.
[25] Ahmed M H, Suleiman R J. Academic library consortium in Jordan: An evaluation study [J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2013, 39(2): 138-143.
[26] Chand P, Chauhan S K. The union catalogue of academic libraries in India: An initiative by INFLIBNET[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2008, 36(3): 142-148.
[27] Hulse B, Cheverie J F, Dygert C T. ALADIN Research Commons: A consortial institutional repository[J]. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 2007, 23(2): 158-169.
[28] Payne L. Library storage facilities and the future of print collections in North America[EB/OL]. [2015-04-04]. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2007/2007-01.pdf.
[29] Revitt M, Guthro C. Together we are stronger: A cooperative approach to managing print collections[EB/OL]. [2015-04-05].http://library.ifla.org/77/.
[30] Maskell C, Soutter J, Oldenburg K. Collaborative print repositories: A case study of library directors' views[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2010, 36(3): 242-249.
[31] Malpas C.RLG partnership shared print collections working group shared print policyreview report[EB/OL]. [2015-04-05]. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-03.pdf.
[32] Demas S. Curating collective collections — Policies for shared print programs: Questions to address in writing a Memorandum of understanding (MOU)[J]. Against the Grain, 2014, 26(1): 72-73.
[33] Demas S.Curating collective collections — Policies for shared print programs: Emerging shared print policy choices as reflected in MOU's[J].Against the Grain, 2014, 26 (2): 87-88.
[34] Demas S.Curating collective collections — Policies for shared print programs: Thoughts on future coordination[J]. Against the Grain, 2014, 26 (2): 80-82.
[35] Reilly B F Jr. Preserving American print resources[J].Library Management, 2005, 26(1/2): 102-105.
[36] Walters T O, Skinner K. Economics, sustainability, and the cooperative model in digital preservation[J].Library Hi Tech, 2010, 28(2): 259-272.
[37] Nancy Y M. Aligning national approaches to digital preservation [EB/OL].[2015-05-05]. http://educopia.org/sites/educopia.org/files/publications/Aligning_National_Approaches_to_Digital_Preservation.pdf.
[38] Reilly B F Jr. The future of cooperative collections and repositories: A case study of the Center for Research Libraries[J]. Library Management, 2013, 34(4-5): 342-351.
[39] Trehub A, Wilson T C. Keeping it simple: The Alabama Digital Preservation Network (ADPNet)[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2010, 28(2): 245-258.
[40] Posner B, Simpson E. The Rethinking Resource Sharing Initiative: Education, advocacy and inspiration for libraries[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2011, 39(3): 142-147.
[41] Ilesanmi T C. Library consortium: IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria experience [J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(4):187-191.
[42] Smart C A, Stewart-Fullerton C. Exploration of an e-resources consortium in Jamaica: An initial examination and tentative suggestions for the future[J]. Advances in Librarianship, 2014, 37:243-268.
[43] Mangiaracina S, Zaetta M, Matteis D D, et al. NILDE: Developing a new generation tool for document delivery in Italy[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2008, 36(3): 167-177.
[44] 张冉. 非营利组织管理[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2014:56.
[45] Taole N, Dick A L. Implementing a common library system for the Lesotho Library Consortium[J].The Electronic Library, 2009, 27(1): 5-19.
[46] Golder M, Birch K. Resource sharing in a cloud computing age[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2012, 40(1): 4-11.
[47] MacKeigan C. The future of interoperability for ILL and resource sharing[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2014, 42(2/3): 105-108.
[48] Sanville T. OhioLINK: A US resource sharing facility -Issues and development[J]. Interlending & Document Supply, 2007, 35(1): 31-37.
[49] Bailey-Hainer B, Beaubien A, Posner B, et al. Rethinking library resource sharing: New models for collaboration[J].Interlending & Document Supply, 2014, 42(1): 7-12.

文章导航

/