图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2017 , Vol. 61 >Issue 7: 91 - 95

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.07.013

情报研究

Q指数——一种考虑了时间因素的新型h指数

  • 龙艺璇 ,
  • 赵庆峰 ,
  • 赵星辉
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学院大学 北京 100049;
    3. 山东科技大学计算机科学与工程学院 青岛 266590
龙艺璇(ORCID:0000-0002-5395-4049),硕士研究生,E-mail:longyixuan@mail.las.ac.cn;赵庆峰(ORCID:0000-0002-0238-9481),讲师,博士;赵星辉(ORCID:0000-0001-8466-6990),硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2016-12-28

  修回日期: 2017-03-06

  网络出版日期: 2017-04-05

收起

Q-index——A New Type of h-index Considering Time

  • Long Yixuan ,
  • Zhao Qingfeng ,
  • Zhao Xinghui
Expand
  • 1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
    3. College of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590

Received date: 2016-12-28

  Revised date: 2017-03-06

  Online published: 2017-04-05

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 针对当前研究主体评价存在的缺陷，对已有h指数进一步完善，使得对研究主体的评价更加公平公正。[方法/过程] 在h指数基础上，创新性地考虑时间因素，提出一种新型指数Q指数。以随机选取的数理科学领域的四位学者为例，通过计算四位学者的Q指数验证该指数的实用性和可靠性。[结果/结论] 结果显示，Q指数的变化过程可以反映出研究主体的发展趋势。因此Q指数可以作为人才发现、聘用教师、评定职称的依据，并引导科研人员朝科学健康的方向发展。

关键词： 研究主体评价; h指数; 被引频次; Q指数; 发展趋势

本文引用格式

龙艺璇 , 赵庆峰 , 赵星辉 . Q指数——一种考虑了时间因素的新型h指数[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017 , 61(7) : 91 -95 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.07.013

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Considering the defects of the current research subject evaluation, this paper improves h-index to make the evaluation of research subjects more fair and equitable.[Method/process] Based on the h-index, Q-index was proposed by considering the time factor creatively. We randomly selected four scholars in the field of mathematical science to verify the practicality and reliability of the Q-index by calculating the Q-index of four scholars. [Result/conclusion] The results show that the Q-index changing process can reflect the development trend of research subjects. Therefore, the Q-index can serve as the basis for hiring teachers or evaluating the title. In addition, it can guide researchers towards a healthy and scientific direction.

Key words： research subject evaluation; h-index; citation frequency; Q-index; development trend

参考文献

[1] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005,102(46): 16569-16572.
[2] ROUSSEAU R. New developments related to the Hirsh index[J]. Science focus, 2006(4): 23-25.
[3] SCHREIBER M. The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe's g index[J]. Scientometrics, 2008,76(1): 187-200.
[4] 云中客. H指数[J]. 物理新闻和动态, 2005,34(11): 819.
[5] 金碧辉, ROUSSEAU R. R指数、AR指数:h指数功能扩展的补充指标[J], 科学观察, 2007,2(3):1-8.
[6] WU Q. The w-index: a measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010,61(3):609-614.
[7] 张学梅. hm指数——对h指数的修正[J]. 图书情报工作, 2007,51(10): 116-118.
[8] 许新军. ha指数:对h指数的修正——"金牌优先"法则的启示[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2009,32(11):8-12.
[9] 叶鹰. h指数和类h指数的机理分析与实证研究导引[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2007(5)2-5.
[10] 吕娜,刘扬,全少颖. 基于作者主要贡献的h指数时间趋势分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2015,34(4):54-58.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉