[目的/意义] 研究学术论文内容的组合新颖性与其学术影响力的关系,为研究论文的学术影响力提供新的研究视角。[方法/过程] 采用文本挖掘方法对论文题目、摘要和关键词中的主题词进行提取,通过构建领域主题词共现网络,为每篇论文设计了新颖组合率、中等组合率和常规组合率3个指标,将领域论文划分为不同的新颖性/常规性类型,然后对不同类型论文中高被引论文所占的比例进行统计分析。[结果/结论] 同时具有主题词组合高新颖性和高常规性特点的论文成为高被引论文的几率显著高于其他类型的论文,因此建议研究者在科学研究中应注重新颖知识与常规知识的适当组合。
[Purpose/significance] We study the combinational novelty of academic papers' contents, providing a new perspective for research in academic impact.[Method/process] We apply text mining methods for extracting key-terms in the title, abstract and keywords part of all papers in a particular research field, and design three indicators-novel, medium and conventional combination rates for each paper by constructing a key-term co-occurrence network. Then we divide all papers into different novelty/convention combination types, and analyze the proportion of highly cited papers for different combination types.[Result/conclusion] We find that papers of high novelty and high conventionality have a significantly higher probability of becoming highly cited papers than other types of papers. The results imply that researchers should seek appropriate combination of novel and conventional knowledge in the process of scientific research.
[1] HENDERSON R M, CLARK K B. Architectural innovation:the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1990, 35(1):9-30.
[2] WHITESIDE D T. The mathematical principles underlying Newton's Principia Mathematica[J]. Journal for the history of astronomy, 1971, 1(2):116-138.
[3] MUKHERJEE S, UZZI B, JONES B, et al. A new method for identifying recombinations of existing knowledge associated with high-impact innovation[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2016, 33(2):224-236.
[4] TAHAMTAN I, AFSHAR A S, AHAMDZADEH K. Factors affecting number of citations:a comprehensive review of the literature[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3):1-31.
[5] SCHILLING M A, GREEN E. Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation:an analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences[J]. Research policy, 2011, 40(10):1321-1331.
[6] UZZI B, JONES B. Atypical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157):468-472.
[7] BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Atypical combinations are confounded by disciplinary effects[C]//International conference on science and technology indicators.Leiden:Universiteit Leiden, 2014:64-71.
[8] YEGROS-YEGROS A, RAFOLS I, D'ESTE P. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity[J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10(8):e0135095. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135095.
[9] NONAKA I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J]. Organization science, 2009, 11(1):833-845.
[10] FAGERBERG J, MOWERY D C, NELSON R R. The Oxford handbook of innovation[M]. Oxford:Oxford University press, 2005.
[11] YOUN H, STRUMSKY D, BETTENCOURT L M A, et al. Invention as a combinatorial process:evidence from US patents[EB/OL].[2016-10-23].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424706/.
[12] MACK C A. How to write a good scientific paper:title, abstract, and keywords[J]. Journal of micro/nanolithography mems & moems, 2012, 11(2):242-248.
[13] COULTER N, MONARCH I, KONDA S. Software engineering as seen through its research literature:a study in co-word analysis[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 1998, 49(13):1206-1223.
[14] HU J, ZHANG Y. Research patterns and trends of recommendation system in China using co-word analysis[J]. Information processing & management, 2015, 88(4):329-339.
[15] HONG Y, YAO Q, YANG Y, et al. Knowledge structure and theme trends analysis on general practitioner research:a co-word perspective[J]. BMC family practice, 2016, 17(1):1-15.
[16] 刘雪立. 基于Web of Science和ESI数据库高被引论文的界定方法[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2012, 23(6):975-978.
[17] 齐青. Web of Science的检索和应用[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2013(2):110-112.
[18] NAYAK P C, SUDHEER K P, RANGAN D M, et al. A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2004, 291(1-2):52-66.