[目的/意义] 探索用不同的方法对学术期刊进行评价，以获得更加有效、公平和有价值的信息，促进期刊评价理论与实践的发展。[方法/过程] 将经济学中的自由处置壳（FDH）效率评价模型引入到文献计量学中，对传统FDH模型进行调整，构建一种新的期刊评价方法，选取7个指标对图书情报类的41种期刊进行评价，并将评价结果与其他期刊排名进行相关性分析。[结果/结论] 基于FDH模型的期刊评价方法的评价结果更客观，与其他期刊排名显著相关；该方法将期刊评价指标融合在一起，不仅可以测算出每一个被评期刊的得分，还能够提供更多的有价值的信息，为期刊部门提供决策参考。例如，FDH模型可以识别出被评期刊的"标杆""控制期刊"等，期刊通过与其各指标表现接近的期刊进行对比、分析，发现自身存在的不足和差距，达到持续改进乃至超越的目的。
[Purpose/significance] This article aims at exploring different methods of evaluating academic journals, so that we can obtain more effective, fair and valuable information, and then promote the development of theory and the practice of journal evaluation.[Method/process] In this paper, a new method of academic journal evaluation is constructed by introducing FDH model that is used for efficiency evaluation in economics into bibliometrics. Then, we selected seven indicators to evaluate 41 journals in library and information science, and carried out correlation analysis between the evaluation results and other periodical rankings.[Result/conclusion] Firstly, the evaluation results of journal evaluation method based on FDH are more objective, and these results are consistent with other well-known reference rankings. Secondly, this method aggregates several journal evaluation indicators, which not only can calculate the score of each journal, but also can provide more valuable information. So, it may be benefit for the editorial board to formulate strategies. For example, the FDH model can identify "benchmarks" and "dominating journals" of the evaluated journal. The journal can find out its own shortcomings and gaps through comparing journals whose performance is close to it, and then achieve the goal of continual improvement and surpassing competitors.
[1] HADDOW G, GENONI P. Citation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(2):471-487.
[2] BENATI S, STEFANI S. The academic journal ranking problem:a fuzzy-clustering approach[J]. Journal of classification, 2011, 28(1):7-20.
[3] CURRIE R R, PANDHER G S. Finance journal rankings and tiers:an active scholar assessment methodology[J]. Journal of banking & finance, 2011, 35(1):7-20.
[4] ENNAS G, BIGGIO B, GUARDO M C D. Data-driven journal meta-ranking in business and management[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3):1911-1929.
[5] BORGER B D, KERSTENS K. Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments:a comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches[J]. Regional science & urban economics, 1996, 26(2):145-170.
[6] GUPTA S, VERHOEVEN M. The efficiency of government expenditure:experiences from Africa[J]. Journal of policy modeling, 2001, 23(4):433-467.
[7] 邱兆祥,张爱武. 基于FDH方法的中国商业银行X-效率研究[J]. 金融研究, 2009(11):91-102.
[8] 董晨景,梁樑,丁晶晶. 并联生产系统FDH模型及其在分配问题中的应用[J]. 系统管理学报, 2015,24(4):595-601.
[9] FEALING K H, LANE J I, Ⅲ J H M, et al. The science of science policy[M]. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 2011.
[10] DEPRINS D, SIMAR L, TULKENS H. Measuring labor-efficiency in post offices[J]. Performance of public enterprises concepts & measurement, 1984:285-309.
[11] TULKENS H. On FDH efficiency analysis:some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit[J]. Journal of productivity analysis, 1993, 4(1):183-210.
[12] LOVELL C A K, PASTOR J T. Radial DEA models without inputs or without outputs[J]. European journal of operational research, 1999, 118(1):46-51.
[13] 李浩,王公宝,宋业新,等. 只有输出(入)的DEA改进模型及其应用[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 2011, 25(3):168-174.
[14] HALKOS G E, TZEREMES N G. Measuring economic journals' citation efficiency:a data envelopment analysis approach[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(3):979-1001.
[15] TVSELMANN H, SINKOVICS R R, PISHCHULOV G. Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings-a classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis[J]. Omega, 2015, 51:11-23.
[16] LOVELL C A K. Measuring the macroeconomic performance of the Taiwanese economy[J]. International journal of production economics, 1995, 39(1):165-178.
[17] GARCÍA-ROMERO A, SANTÍN D, SICILIA G. Another brick in the wall:a new ranking of academic journals in economics using FDH[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(1):91-101.
[18] HARNAD S. Multiple metrics required to measure research performance[J]. Nature, 2009, 457(7231):785.
[19] 吴涛,杨筠,陈晨,等. 基于因子分析法的科技期刊引文综合评价指标研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015, 26(2):205-209.
[20] 李晓燕. 基于数据包络分析的标杆管理理论与应用研究[D].南京:南京理工大学, 2010.
