[目的/意义]调研中外科研人员对社交网络的认知情况，对学术工作者使用社交网络的目的、动机和需求开展比较研究。[方法/过程]利用问卷调查法收集来自国内各大高校707位被调查者对社交网络的认知、使用动机和访问信息，并将问卷调查结果与Nature研究结果进行比较。[结果/结论]结果显示，我国科研人员对学术社交网络的使用率和使用意识并不是很高，国内科研人员比较倾向于使用以社交型为导向的网站，对以学术型为导向的网站使用较少。国外主流ASNS平台中，我国用户对ResearchGate具有一定的认知度。
[Purpose/significance] This paper investigates the cognition of Chinese and foreign researchers on social networking, and makes a comparative study on the purpose, motivation and needs of academic workers using social networks. [Method/process] Based on questionnaires, users’ awareness of social networks, use motivation, and access information, and so on from 707 Chinese respondents are collected. The results are compared with the investigation from Nature. [Result/conclusion] The result shows that Chinese scholars are not very aware of the use of the SNS, and tend to use Google Scholar. In foreign main SNS platforms, Chinese scholars have a certain degree of awareness of ResearchGate. In addition, Chinese scholars mainly use SNS to acquire academic information and less for more important functions, such as research cooperation and communication.
[1] BOYD D M, ELLISON N B. Social network sites:definition, history, and scholarship[J]. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2010, 38(3):16-31.
[2] NOORDEN R V. Online collaboration:scientists and the social network[J]. Nature, 2014, 512(7513):126-129.
[3] BIK H M, GOLDSTEIN M C. An introduction to social media for scientists[J]. PLoS scientists and the social network biology, 2013, 11(4):e1001535.
[4] 李玲丽, 吴新年, 张甫. 开放型科研社交网络应用调查与分析——以Academia.edu为例[J]情报资料工作, 2013, 34(1):90-93.
[5] ORTEGA J L. Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites[J]. Online information review, 2015, 39(4):520-536.
[6] 张耀坤,张维嘉,胡方丹.中国高影响力学者对学术社交网站的使用行为调查——以教育部长江学者为例[J].情报资料工作,2017(3):96-101.
[7] THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Academia.edu:social network or academic network?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65(4):721-731.
[8] ORTEGA J L, AGUILLO I F. Science is all in the eye of the beholder:keyword maps in Google scholar citations[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2012, 63(12):2370-2377.
[9] BULLINGER A C, HALLERSTEDE S H, RENKEN U, et al. Towards research collaboration-a taxonomy of social research network sites[C]////Sustainable IT Collaboration Around the Globe. 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems.Lima:AMCIS,2010:12-15.
[10] ALMOUSA O. Users' classification and usage-pattern identification in academic social networks[C]//Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies. Piscataway:IEEE, 2012:1-6.
[11] MAS-BLEDA A, THELWALL M, KOUSHA K, et al. Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1):337-356.
[12] 邓胜利, 向阳. 基于学术社交网络的文献阅读及学科关注点差异研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(6):99-106.
[13] GRUZD A. 2-Non-academic and academic social networking sites for online scholarly communities[M]. NEAL D R. Social media for academics. London:Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2012.
