情报研究

美国情报产品标准与质量控制机制研究

  • 谢晓专
展开
  • 1. 中国人民公安大学国家安全与反恐怖学院 北京 100038;
    2. 清华大学新闻与传播学院 北京 100084
谢晓专(ORCID:0000-0003-3309-0092),副教授,博士研究生,E-mail:xinxizhanlue@163.com。

收稿日期: 2018-10-19

  修回日期: 2019-01-25

  网络出版日期: 2019-09-20

基金资助

本文系中央基本科研业务经费项目"美国执法与国土安全情报融合策略及其经验借鉴"(项目编号:2016JKF01205)研究成果之一。

Research on the Standards and Quality Control Mechanism of Intelligence Products in the U.S

  • Xie Xiaozhuan
Expand
  • 1. School of National Security and Counter-terrorism, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038;
    2. School of Journalism and Communication, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084

Received date: 2018-10-19

  Revised date: 2019-01-25

  Online published: 2019-09-20

摘要

[目的/意义]建立健全情报产品标准及其质量控制机制是确保情报分析产品与服务质量的重要举措。研究美国情报产品标准及其质量控制机制,为我国制定情报产品标准提供参考。[方法/过程]通过考察美国情报界和执法界情报产品规范相关法律政策与标准文件,总结归纳美国情报产品类型、规范与质量控制机制,分析美国情报产品标准设计的基本逻辑与思想。[结果/结论]美国按照项目流程和要素规范管理逻辑,秉持"合法性""实用性""实证性""用户需求导向"的基本理念,遵循"源数据控制、认知缺陷控制、分析过程控制和陈述规范控制"的基本思想,按照"假设-证据(信息)-结论(判断与建议)"的分析框架,从"一般质量要求、内容规范、形式规范、信源属性、用户反馈/质量监管、法庭证词与法律考量"出发规定情报产品标准,通过"情报分析人员自我把关、用户反馈、同行评议、主管机构监管"等四类控制机制,确保情报产品符合"准确、客观、及时、独立"的质量标准,形成相对成熟的情报产品标准与质量控制机制。建议我国借鉴美国经验,立足《国家情报法》,明确情报产品的基本要求,制定统一的情报产品标准,提供情报产品范本,建立有效的质量控制机制,以提高我国情报产品的质量。

本文引用格式

谢晓专 . 美国情报产品标准与质量控制机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019 , 63(18) : 87 -98 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.18.011

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Establishing and perfecting the intelligence product standards and quality control mechanism is an important measure to ensure the quality of intelligence products and services. This paper aims to study American intelligence product standards and its quality control mechanism, and provide reference for our country.[Method/process] By reviewing the relevant legal policies and documents about intelligence products in the field of intelligence and law enforcement in U.S, this paper summarized the types, standards and quality control mechanisms of intelligence products, and then analyzed the basic ideals and logics of the design of American intelligence products standards.[Result/conclusion] According to the logic of process management and factors management, and the basic concepts of legitimacy, practicability, positivism and user demand orientation, the United States law enforcement and intelligence community has set standards for intelligence products about the quality requirements, content standards, form standards, source attributes, user feedback, testimony and legal consideration,which follows the basic ideas of "source data control, cognitive defect control, analysis process control and statement normative control", and the analytical framework of "hypothesis-evidence (information)-conclusion (judgement and suggestion)". In order to ensures intelligence products meet the quality standards of "accuracy, objectivity, timeliness and independence", it sets four kinds of control mechanisms that including intelligence analysts self-checking, user feedback, peer review and supervision by competent authorities. And then it has formed relatively mature standards and quality control of intelligence products. It is suggested that China should learn from the experience of the United States based on the National Intelligence Law, to improve the quality of intelligence products by clarifying the basic requirements, developing unified standards and models, and establishing effective quality control mechanism for intelligence products.

参考文献

[1] The U.S. Department of Justice's Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative (Global). Minimum criminal intelligence training standards(version 2)[S/OL].[2018-08-10].https://it.ojp.gov/documents/d/minimum%20criminal%20intelligence%20training%20standards.pdf.
[2] PARKS D, MARILYN P. Intelligence reports//MARILYN P, BOB M, RICHARD W. Intelligence 2000:revising the basic elements[M]. Sacramento, CA:Law Enforcement Intelligence Unit, Lawrenceville, NJ:International Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Analysts, Inc., 2000:121-133.
[3] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国国家安全法[Z/OL].[2018-04-25].http://fgk.mof.gov.cn/law/getOneLawInfoAction.do?law_id=84761.
[4] Intelligence community Directive 203(ICD 203). Analytic standards[S/OL].[2018-04-25]. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICD/ICD%20203%20Analytic%20Standards.pdf.
[5] The White House. Executive Order 13470:Further amendments to Executive Order 12333, United States intelligence activities[Z/OL].[2018-04-25].https://www.dni.gov/index.php/ic-legal-reference-book/executive-order-12333.
[6] Public Law 108-458. Intelligence reform and terrorism prevention act of 2004[Z/OL].[2018-04-25].https://fas.org/irp/congress/2004_rpt/h108-796.pdf.
[7] Public Law 110-53. Implementing recommendations of the 9·11 commission act of 2007[Z/OL].[2018-04-25].https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/pidb/legislation/pdfs/public-law-110-53.pdf.
[8] The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. Presidential policy directive -signals intelligence activities (PPD-28)[S/OL].[2018-04-25].https://www.dhs.gov/publication/presidential-policy-directive-28-ppd-28-signals-intelligence-activities-0
[9] ICD 206. Sourcing requirements for disseminated analytic products[S/OL].[2018-04-25].https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICD/ICD%20206.pdf.
[10] ICD 208. Maximizing the utility of analytic products[S/OL].[2018-04-25].https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICD/ICD%20208%20-%20Maximizing%20the%20Utility%20of%20Analytic%20Products%20(09%20Jan%202017).pdf.
[11] ICD 209. Tearline production and dissemination[S/OL].[2018-04-25].https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICD/ICD%20209%20Tearline%20Production%20and%20Dissemination.pdf.
[12] International Association of Chiefs of Police. Criminal intelligence sharing:a national plan for intelligence-led policing at the local, state and federal levels[M].Alexandria, Virginia:International Association of Chiefs of Police, 2002.
[13] Global Intelligence Working Group. The national criminal intelligence sharing plan[S/OL].[2017-04-01]. https://it.ojp.gov/docdownloader.aspx?ddid=1153.
[14] Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative, International Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Analysts, Inc. Law Enforcement Analytic Standards[S/OL].[2018-04-28].http://www.ok-safe.com/files/documents/1/Law_Enforcement_Analytic_Standards.pdf.
[15] Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative, International Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Analysts, Inc. Law Enforcement Analytic Standards(2nd edition)[S/OL].[2018-04-28].https://it.ojp.gov/documents/d/Law%20Enforcement%20Analytic%20Standards%2004202_combined_compliant.pdf.
[16] U.S. Department of Justice's Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Fusion center guidelines——developing and sharing information and intelligence in a new era[S/OL].[2018-04-20].https://it.ojp.gov/documents/fusion_center_guidelines_law_enforcement.pdf.
[17] Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative. Baseline capabilities for state and major urban area fusion centers[S/OL].[2018-04-18]. https://it.ojp.gov/documents/d/baseline%20capabilities%20for%20state%20and%20major%20urban%20area%20fusion%20centers.pdf.
[18] The Intelligence Training Coordination Working Group. Minimum criminal intelligence training standards for United States law enforcement and other criminal justice agencies (version 2)[S/OL].[2018-04-28]. https://it.ojp.gov/documents/d/minimum%20criminal%20intelligence%20training%20standards.pdf.
[19] The Global Advisory Committee. Minimum standards for intermediate-level analytic training courses[S/OL].[2018-04-28].https://www.nationalpublicsafetypartnership.org/clearinghouse/Content/ResourceDocuments/Minimum%20Standards%20for%20Intermediate-Level%20Analytic%20Training%20Courses.pdf.
[20] The Global Advisory Committee. Analyst Professional Development Road Map[S/OL].[2018-04-28]. https://it.ojp.gov/CAT/Resource/40.
[21] U.S. Department of Justice's Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The common competencies for state, Local, and tribal intelligence analysts[S/OL].[2018-04-28].https://it.ojp.gov/documents/d/common%20competencies%20state%20local%20and%20Tribal%20intelligence%20analysts.pdf.
[22] Executive Order 12291. Criminal intelligence systems operating policies (28 CFR Part 23)[Z/OL].[2018-04-25]. https://it.ojp.gov/documents/28cfr_part_23.pdf.
[23] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime(UNODC).Criminal intelligence:manual for analysts[M/OL].[2018-04-28].https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/Law-Enforcement/Criminal_Intelligence_for_Analysts.pdf.
[24] HEUER R J. Psychology of intelligence analysis[M/OL].[2018-04-25].https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/psychology-of-intelligence-analysis/.
[25] 肯特.战略情报:为世界政策服务[M].刘微、肖皓元,译.北京:金城出版社,2012:193-196.
[26] HENDRICKSON N. Critical thinking in intelligence analysis[J]. International journal of intelligence and counter Intelligence, 2008,21(4):679-693.
文章导航

/

〈 〉