［目的/意义］ 从人文学者的角度出发，探讨人文学者如何看待数字人文，他们又如何被数字人文的浪潮所影响。通过对人文学者数字学术认知与数字学术需求的考察，为数字人文服务和系统设计奠定基础。［方法/过程］ 采用质性研究方法，对文学、历史、哲学和艺术4个领域展开比较研究，并以访谈素材进行饱和度检验，构建起"认知-预判-担忧-需求与应对"的质性主线。［结果/结论］ 研究发现，不同领域人文学者对数字学术的认知并不完全相同，但对其影响的预判也存在共性之处，他们普遍认同数字化对人文的研究素材、研究方法、知识传播和研究问题都会产生一定影响；面对数字化浪潮，人文学者的担忧主要包括对数字学术研究深度的担忧、对学科主体地位的担忧和对技术环境下学术伦理问题的担忧；最后，人文学者在自身能力提升、数据、技术、科研评价体系方面存在许多需求，其中对"基础设施"和"数字项目"的需求最为迫切。
[Purpose/significance] From the perspective of humanities scholars, this paper discussed how humanities scholars viewed Digital Humanities and how they were influenced by the wave of Digital Humanities. Through the investigation of humanities scholars’ digital scholarship cognition and digital scholarship needs, it laid the foundation for digital humanistic service and system design. [Method/process] Using qualitative research method, this paper made a comparative research in four fields of literature, history, philosophy and art, and conducted saturation test with interview materials to construct the qualitative main line of "cognition-prediction-anxiety-demand and response". [Result/conclusion] It’s found that humanists scholars in different fields do not have the same cognition of digital scholarship, but their prediction of its influence also has something in common. They generally agree that digitalization has some influence on the research materials, research methods, knowledge dissemination and research problems of humanities. In the face of the digital wave, the concerns of humanities scholars mainly include the depth of digital scholarship research, the subject status of humanities and academic ethics in the technological environment. Finally, there are many needs for humanities scholars in terms of capacity improvement, data, technology, and research evaluation system, among which the most urgent needs are "infrastructure" and "digital project".
[1] 肖鹏.从"营造生态"到"需求驱动":学术图书馆如何满足人文学者的数字学术需求[J].农业图书情报学报,2020,32(9):50-57.
[2] 肖鹏,姚楚晖.走向数字时代的人文学者:泛LIS视域下的进展与反思[J].文献与数据学报,2019,1(3):18-25.
[3] STONE S. Humanities scholars:information needs and uses[J]. Journal of documentation, 1982, 38(4):292-313.
[4] GIVEN L M, WILLSON R. Information technology and the humanities scholar:documenting digital research practices[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(6):807-819.
[5] DAHL C. PDA and the humanities assessing the fit through an examination of the literature on humanists and e-resources[J]. Electronic library, 2013, 31(6):745-752.
[6] BRONSTEIN J, BARUCHSON-ARBIB S. The application of cost-benefit and least effort theories in studies of information seeking behavior of humanities scholars:the case of jewish studies scholars in Israel[J]. Journal of information science, 2008, 34(2):131-144.
[7] SINN D. Impact of digital archival collections on historical research[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2012, 63(8):1521-1537.
[8] BLANKE T, HEDGES M, DUNN S. Arts and humanities e-science-current practices and future challenges[J]. Future generation computer systems, 2009, 25(4):474-480.
[9] WARWICK C, TERRAS M, HUNTINGTON P, et al. If you build it will they come? the lairah study:quantifying the use of online resources in the arts and humanities through statistical analysis of user log data[J]. Literary and linguistic computing, 2007(23):85-102.
[10] HEAD A J. Information literacy from the trenches:how do humanities and social science majors conduct academic research?[J]. College & research libraries, 2008, 69(5):427-446.
[11] UCAK N O. Information use in art:a citation analysis of sources used in art theses in turkey[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 2011, 37(1):77-81.
[12] 邱子恒.中文系教师信息行为之研究:以辅仁大学为例[J].中国图书馆学报,2011,37(2):61-74.
[13] Al-SHBOUL M K, ABRIZAH A. Information needs:developing personas of humanities scholars[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2014,40(5):500-509.
[14] CLEMENT T E, CARTER D. Connecting theory and practice in digital humanities information work[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2017, 68(6):1385-1396.
[15] GOTTSCHALL J. Literature, science, and a new humanities[M]. New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[16] MARCHE S. Literature is not data:against digital humanities[EB/OL].[2020-10-08]. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/literature-is-not-data-against-digital-humanities.
[17] EYERS T. The perils of the "digital humanities":new positivisms and the fate of literary theory[J]. Postmodern culture, 2013, 23(2):e38.
[18] 杜晓勤.国学大数据时代来了[N].光明日报,2013-09-16(15).
[19] 姜义华.大数据催生史学大变革[N].中国社会科学报,2015-04-29(B05).
[20] 梁晨,董浩,李中清.量化数据库与历史研究[J].历史研究,2015(2):113-128,191-192.
[21] 熊金武.量化研究成为史学发展新趋势[N].中国社会科学报,2013-08-28(A05).
[22] 梁晨.大数据时代历史研究新方法[N].中国社会科学报,2016-06-03(5).
[23] 黄欣荣.大数据时代的哲学变革[N].光明日报,2014-12-03(15).
[24] 戴潘.基于大数据的科学研究范式的哲学研究[J].哲学动态,2016(9):105-109.
[25] 齐磊磊.大数据经验主义——如何看待理论、因果与规律[J].哲学动态,2015(7):89-95.
[26] 张杰.文学量化研究利弊参半[N].中国社会科学报,2016-10-10(2).
[27] 单小曦.数字文学研究:回应数字时代的文学实践[N].中国社会科学报,2012-06-15(A04).
[28] 鲁雯.数字媒体艺术的跨学科趋势[J].文艺研究,2011(3):152-153.
[29] 张云. 数字艺术将与传统艺术融合共生[N]. 光明日报,2019-01-17(7).
[30] 何志钧.打造数字美学研究的中国学派[N].中国社会科学报,2018-12-03(4).
[31] 孙建军.大数据时代人文社会科学如何发展[N].光明日报,2014-07-07(11).
[32] 雷家琼.构建量化数据库算出更精确的历史[N].中国社会科学报,2014-06-30(A12).
[33] 段虹,徐苗苗.论大数据分析与认知模式的重构[J].哲学研究,2016(2):105-109,129.
[34] 陈志武.量化历史研究的过去与未来[J].清史研究,2016(4):1-16.
[35] 徐从辉.大数据时代:重构文化空间的人文向度[N].中国社会科学报,2015-03-02(A04).
[36] 杨敏.数字历史:让历史与公众有更多互动[N].中国社会科学报,2014-10-08(A03).
[37] 胡冰.数字敦煌:新时期文化遗产保护新路径[N].中国社会科学报,2018-11-29(7).
[38] 王广禄.数字人文促进方法论革新[N].中国社会科学报,2017-07-05(2).
[39] 郑永晓.加快"数字化"向"数据化"转变——"大数据"、"云计算"理论与古典文学研究[J].文学遗产,2014(6):141-148.
[40] 黎杨全.数字时代艺术批评的空间转向[J].民族艺术,2013(2):54-58.
[41] 刘红,胡新和.数据哲学构建的初步探析[J].哲学动态,2012(12):82-88.
[42] 刘炜,谢蓉,张磊,等.面向人文研究的国家数据基础设施建设[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(5):29-39.
[43] 张小溪.数字技术介入人文研究成趋势[N].中国社会科学报,2014-05-30(A03).
[44] 孙美娟.大数据研究助推哲学社会科学繁荣发展[N].中国社会科学报,2019-07-09(1).
