[目的/意义] 针对原始资料整理中存在的问题，提出一种可实现考古发掘资料数据化转换和语义关联的方法，帮助考古学工作者规避低效流程。[方法/过程] 首先，结合实例对人文学科原始资料的特征进行解析，设计原始资料数据化转换的过程和方法；其次，选取新疆和静察吾呼墓地的考古发掘资料为实证数据来源，构建考古发掘资料图数据库；最后，以文物间的共存关系为例，实现考古发掘资料图数据库的语义关联构建。[结果/结论] 考古发掘资料图数据库及其语义关联的构建，为考古发掘资料的数据化转换提供了新的方法和思路，在数字人文领域有推广价值和实际意义。
[Purpose/significance] Aiming at the current problems on the collation of primary sources, this paper proposes a method which can realize the datalization and semantic association of archaeological excavation resources, so as to help archaeologists avoid inefficient processes.[Method/process] Firstly, after analyzing the characteristics of the primary sources of humanities with example, the process and method of datalization of primary sources was designed; Subsequently, the graph database on archaeological excavation resources was constructed based on the data of Xinjiang Hejing Chawuhu Cemeteries which has been selected as the empirical data source of this paper; Later, we succeed in the association construction of the coexistence relationships between relics, the semantic associations of the graph database were finally realized.[Result/conclusion] The construction of the graph database on archaeological excavation resources and its semantic associations could provide a new idea for the datalization of archaeological excavation resources, and has promotional value and practical significance in the field of Digital Humanities.
[1] 王晓光."数字人文"的产生、发展与前沿[EB/OL].[2021-04-02]. http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=67855&do=blog&id=275758.
[2] 林泽斐.英国数字人文项目研究热点分析——基于DHCommons项目数据库的实证研究[J].情报资料工作, 2018(1):97-104.
[3] 刘炜,谢蓉,张磊,等.面向人文研究的国家数据基础设施建设[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(5):29-39.
[4] MAY K, BINDING C, TUDHOPE D. A STAR is born:some emerging semantic technologies for archaeological resources[C]//Proceedings of the 36th conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology. Budapest:CAA, 2008:402-407.
[5] BINDING C, MAY K, SOUZA R, et al. Semantic technologies for archaeology resources:eesults from the star project[C]//Proceedings of the 38th conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology. Granada:CAA, 2010:555-561.
[6] Integrated archaeological database[DB/OL].[2021-04-02]. http://iadb.org.uk/.
[7] BATTENFELD I, BECKMANN I, SCHULTZE J, et al. Unifying archaeological databases using triples[C]//4th International conference on cooperation and promotion of information resources in science and technology. Beijing:IEEE, 2009:281-284.
[8] OCHRE Data Service[DB/OL].[2021-04-02]. https://voices.uchicago.edu/ochre/.
[9] 张双羽.考古数据挖掘研究与E-Arch考古信息系统优化[D].北京:清华大学, 2012.
[10] 祝帆帆,高劲松,梁艳琪.馆藏文物资源关联数据的创建与发布——以中国十大绘画为例[J].图书馆理论与实践,2018(4):96-101.
[11] 郭金龙,许鑫.数字人文中的文本挖掘研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2012,30(3):11-18.
[12] 王丽丽,朱小梅.古籍钤印元数据著录规范设计与应用研究[J].图书馆,2020(1):106-111.
[13] 周耀林,赵跃,孙晶琼.非物质文化遗产信息资源组织与检索研究路径——基于本体方法的考察与设计[J].情报杂志,2017,36(8):166-174.
[14] 周莉娜,洪亮,高子阳.唐诗知识图谱的构建及其智能知识服务设计[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(2):24-33.
[15] 陈涛,刘炜,单蓉蓉,等.知识图谱在数字人文中的应用研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2019,45(6):34-49.
[16] 曾蕾,王晓光,范炜.图档博领域的智慧数据及其在数字人文研究中的角色[J].中国图书馆学报,2018,44(1):17-34.
[17] 孔令远, 陈永清. 江苏邳州市九女墩三号墩的发掘[J]. 考古, 2002(5):19-30.
[18] 马永强, 程卫. 江苏邳州九女墩三号墩出土铜盘铭文考释[J]. 文物, 2019(10):79-81.
[19] 新疆文物考古研究所. 新疆察吾呼——大型氏族墓地发掘报告[M]. 北京:东方出版社, 1999.
[20] 张之恒. 中国考古学通论[M]. 南京:南京大学出版社, 2009.
[21] 王红,张青青,蔡伟伟,等.基于Neo4j的领域本体存储方法研究[J].计算机应用研究, 2017,34(8):2404-2407.
