[Purpose/significance] Under the background of open science, the research on the evaluation of discourse power of academic journals plays an active role in enriching and improving the theory and indicator system of academic journals evaluation with Chinese features and accelerating the construction of the discourse system with Chinese features.[Method/process] Based on the theory of evaluation science, discourse power and communication, and according to the thought of "theory, method and application", this paper constructed the theoretical framework of discourse power evaluation for academic journals. This paper also put forward a tentative plan to evaluate the discourse power of Chinese academic journals from the perspectives of multi-dimensions, multi-factors, multi-indicators, multi-methods integration.[Result/conclusion] This paper discussed the basic theoretical issues of the discourse power of academic journals, and combines scientometrics and Altmetrics with strong Chinese and international elements to expand the traditional evaluation indicators and reconstruct the system, so as to scientifically evaluate the discourse power of Chinese academic journals. At the same time, this new topic should be further studied, so as to serve the construction of the "three systems" better.
[1] 马费成,李志元.新文科背景下我国图书情报学科的发展前景[J].中国图书馆学报,2020,46(6):4-15.
[2] 陈传夫,李秋实.数据开放获取使科学惠及更广——中国开放科学与科学数据开放获取的进展与前瞻[J].信息资源管理学报,2020,10(1):4-13.
[3] 叶继元.图书馆学期刊质量"全评价"探讨及启示[J].中国图书馆学报,2013,39(4):83-92.
[4] 赵蓉英,王旭.多维视角下学术期刊影响力评价研究[J].情报科学,2019,37(11):3-10.
[5] 邱均平,张裕晨,周子番.新时代我国科研评价体系重构中必须处理好八大关系[J].中国图书馆学报,2021,47(1):47-60.
[6] 邱均平,王珊珊. 发挥第三方评价优势助力科研评价改革[N]. 中国社会科学报,2021-03-23(1).
[7] 金力. 破立结合,营造良好评价体系[N].人民日报,2020-02-28(12).
[8] WOUTERS P, SUGIMOTO C R, LARIVIōRE V,et al. Rethink impact factors:find new ways to judge a journal[J]. Nature, 2019, 569(7758):621-623
[9] FOUCAULT, M. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language[J]. New York:Pantheon Books, 1972.
[10] 许哲.自媒体话语权研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2018.
[11] 胡钦太.中国学术国际话语权的立体化建构[J].学术月刊,2013,45(3):5-13.
[12] 郑杭生.学术话语权与中国社会学发展[J].中国社会科学,2011(2):27-34,4,220.
[13] 张昕,王素,刘兴平.培育世界一流科技期刊的机遇、挑战与对策研究[J].科学通报,2020,65(9):771-781.
[14] 周舟.提升科技期刊影响力的"哑铃型"模式研究[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2010,39(5):140-144.
[15] 王旭,赵蓉英.融合Altmetrics的话语引导力指标与被引频次关系研究——以中国英文学术期刊为例[J/OL].情报理论与实践:1-13.[2021-03-02].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20210208.1412.011.html.
[16] 霍克斯.结构主义和符号学[M]. 瞿铁鹏,译. 上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
[17] 袁三标,陈国栋.西方话语权力生产背后的意识形态逻辑探究[J].思想战线,2013,39(1):118-122.
[18] 杨云霞.话语"权利"抑或"权力":辨析与再认识[J/OL].人民论坛·学术前沿:1-9.[2021-05-01].https://doi.org/10.16619/j.cnki.rmltxsqy.2020.30.023.
[19] 吴瑛.中国话语权生产机制研究[D].上海:上海外国语大学,2010.
[20] LASSWELL H D.The structure and function of communication in society:the communication of ideas[M]. New York:Institute for Religious and Social Studies, 1948.
[21] 张立伟,陈悦,刘则渊,等.社交网络平台非正式科学交流的探讨——基于Evolutionary Biology学科Altmetrics数据计量[J].科学学研究,2018,36(6):1008-1017.
[22] MENZEL H.Planned and unplanned scientific communication[C]//Proceedings of the international conference on scientific information. Washington, D.C:National Academy of Science-National Research Council,1959:199-243.
[23] 米哈依洛夫.科学交流与情报学[M]. 徐新民, 张国华, 孙荣科,等译.北京:科学技术文献出版社, 1983.
[24] 张立伟,陈悦,王智琦,等.互联网平台下科学家非正式学术交流的探究——基于科学网博文数据的计量分析[J].情报学报,2015,34(7):754-764.
[25] 哈肯.大自然成功的奥秘:协同学[M]. 上海:上海译文出版社有限公司, 2018.
[26] 褔柯.必须保卫社会[M]. 钱翰,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1999.
[27] 牛文静,史雅楠.社会化媒体舆情传播的多元互动机制与协同治理[J].青年记者,2019(12):28-29.
[28] 朱煜.马太效应[M]. 北京:中国纺织出版社,2007.
[29] BARABÁ, SI A. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439):509-512.
[30] 闵超,YING DING,李江,等.单篇论著的引文扩散[J].情报学报,2018,37(4):341-350.
[31] 齐夫. 最省力原则:人类行为生态学导论[M]. 薛朝凤,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2016.
[32] 卢婷.网络信息检索行为中的"最小努力法则"[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2010,19(11):53-55, 58.
[33] HOGAN, EILEEN A. The attention economy:understanding the new currency of business[J]. Academy of management executive, 2001, 15(4):145-147.
[34] EVANS J A. Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship[J]. Science, 2008, 321(5887):395-399.
[35] WAY M, AHMAD S A. The San Francisco declaration on research assessment[J]. Journal of cell science, 2013, 126(9):1903-1904.
[36] HICKS D, WOUTERS P, WALTMAN L, et al. Bibliometrics:the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics[J]. Nature, 2015, 520(7548):429-431.
[37] SUGIMOTO C R, WORK S, LARIVIōRE V,et al. Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics:a review of the literature[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2017,68(9):2037-2062.
[38] 王旭.中国学术期刊话语权评价研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2020.
[39] 韩毅.非正式交流回归语境下科技评价的融合路径取向[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(4):64-74.
[40] 刘晓娟,余梦霞.Altmetrics覆盖率影响因素及应用分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(16):92-101.
[41] 俞立平,姜春林.学术期刊评价的视角、基本问题与发展展望[J].情报杂志,2013,32(5):110-114,144.
[42] 张慧玲,董坤,许海云.学术期刊影响力评价方法研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(16):132-143.
[43] 蒋勇青,齐萍.学术期刊影响力评价方法研究[J].中国软科学,2017(3):178-185.
[44] 万昊,谭宗颖,朱相丽.同行评议与文献计量在科研评价中的作用分析比较[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(1):134-152.
