[目的/意义] 学术图书是呈现科学研究活动成果的重要工具，也是人类社会信息活动中的重要信息资源，对学术图书进行影响力评价有利于学术图书得到充分的利用。[方法/过程] 在吸取前人研究成果的基础上设计一套完整、全面的中文人文社会科学学术图书影响力评价体系，从图书的学术影响力和社会影响力两方面出发，设置多级评价指标，并选取CBKCI中图书馆情报与文献学领域的103本学术图书作为研究样本，收集相应的指标数据，采用CRITIC赋权法、TOPSIS法对103个样本图书进行影响力评价实证。[结果/结论] 研究结果表明，本文提出的中文人文社会科学学术图书影响力评价指标和方法，考虑了科研学者、读者、图书本身等因素，较全面地反映出学术图书影响力的各个方面，具有一定的易用性和可行性。
[Purpose/significance] Academic books are not only an important tool to present the results of scientific research activities, but also an important information resource in human social information activities. The impact evaluation of academic books is conductive to the full use of them.[Method/process] On the basis of previous research results, this paper designed a complete and comprehensive impact evaluation system of Chinese academic books on Humanities and Social Sciences, and set up multi-level evaluation indicators from the academic impact and social impact. And this paper selected 103 academic books in the field of Library & Information Science from CBKCI as research samples, collected the corresponding indicator data, and used CRITIC and TOPSIS to evaluate the impact of 103 sample books.[Result/conclusion] The research results show that indicators and methods of the impact evaluation of Chinese academic books on Humanities and Social Sciences proposed in this paper consider the factors of scientific research scholars, readers and books themselves, they comprehensively reflect all aspects of the impact of academic books, and there are a certain ease of use and feasibility.
[1] 国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2020年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2021-02-28)[2021-06-16]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202102/t20210227_1814154.html.
[2] 何明星. 从中华书局海外馆藏看中国学术图书的世界影响力[J]. 出版发行研究, 2012(12):14-18.
[3] WHITE H D, BOELL S K, YU H, et al. Libcitations:a measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 60(6):1083-1096.
[4] 张海营. 基于RFM模型的图书馆图书评价系统研究[J]. 图书馆, 2012(3):60-62.
[5] 李杭. RFM模型在图书质量评价系统中的应用[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2014,26(2):54-57.
[6] 杨思洛, 王皓, 文庭孝. 基于引文分析的图书影响力研究——以图书情报领域为例[J]. 情报资料工作, 2010(1):89-92.
[7] 苏新宁. 我国人文社会科学图书被引概况分析——基于CSSCI数据库[J]. 东岳论丛,2009, 30(7):5-13.
[8] ZUCCALA A A, VERLEYSEN F T, CORNACCHIA R, et al. Altmetrics for the humanities:comparing Goodreads reader ratings with citations to history books[J]. Aslib proceedings, 2015, 67(3):320-336.
[9] SNIJDER R. Revisiting an open access monograph experiment:measuring citations and Tweets 5 years later[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(3):1855-1875.
[10] 马宁, 宋振世. 基于Bookmetrix的数学学科电子图书影响力评价研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(3):72-79.
[11] GORRAIZ J, GUMPENBERGER C, PURNELL P J. The power of book reviews:a simple and transparent enhancement approach for Book Citation Indexes[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2):841-852.
[12] 张凤瑜. 基于图书评论大数据的语义好评度计算方法研究[D]. 长春:东北师范大学,2018.
[13] 童甜甜. 基于多源异构数据的图书评论自动摘要研究[D]. 南京:南京理工大学, 2019.
[14] KOUSHA K, THELWALL M. Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67(3):524-530.
[15] 章成志, 李卓, 赵梦圆. 基于引文内容的中文图书被引行为研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(3):96-109.
[16] 李雁翎, 孙晓慧, 陈玖冰. 五维图书评价体系及分析模型的建构[J]. 情报科学, 2013(8):80-83, 143.
[17] 张玉, 潘云涛, 袁军鹏. 论多维视角下中文科技图书学术影响力评价体系的构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(7):69-76.
[18] 周清清. 基于多源异构数据的图书影响力评价研究[D]. 南京:南京理工大学, 2018.
[19] 肖敖夏, 杨思洛. Bookmetrix指标在学术图书影响力评价中的应用[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2020,40(9):79-85.
[20] 周清清, 章成志. 图书影响力评价研究进展与展望[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2020(3):24-33.
[21] 中国学位与研究生教育信息网. 全国第四轮学科评估结果公布[EB/OL].[2021-06-17]. http://www.cdgdc.edu.cn/xwyyjsjyxx/xkpgjg/.
[22] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴-2020[EB/OL].[2021-06-17]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm.
[23] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
[24] EGGHE L. Theory and practise of the g-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1):131-152.
[25] DIAKOULAKI D, MAVROTAS G, PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems:the critic method[J]. Computers and operations research, 1995, 22(7):763-770.
[26] HWANG C L, YOON K. Multiple attribute decision making methods and application[M]. Berlin:Springer, 1981.
