图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2022 , Vol. 66 >Issue 18: 126 - 139

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.18.012

综述述评

基于科学建模的学科交叉测度研究综述

  • 陈必坤 ,
  • 刘钰馨 ,
  • 白宽 ,
  • 王诗琴 ,
  • 王曰芬
展开
  • 1. 苏州大学社会学院 苏州 215127;
    2. 南京理工大学经济管理学院 南京 210094;
    3. 天津师范大学管理学院 天津 300387
陈必坤,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,E-mail:bkchen@suda.edu.cn;刘钰馨,硕士研究生;白宽,硕士研究生;王诗琴,硕士研究生;王曰芬,教授,博士,博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2022-04-20

  修回日期: 2022-07-04

  网络出版日期: 2022-09-29

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目"面向知识创新服务的数据科学理论与方法研究"(项目编号:16ZAD224)和江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(项目编号:KYCX21_0419&SJCX21_0158)研究成果之一。

收起

Literature Review of Interdisciplinary Measurement Based on Modeling of Science

  • Chen Bikun ,
  • Liu Yuxin ,
  • Bai Kuan ,
  • Wang Shiqin ,
  • Wang Yuefen
Expand
  • 1. School of Social Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215127;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094;
    3. Management School, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387

Received date: 2022-04-20

  Revised date: 2022-07-04

  Online published: 2022-09-29

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]作为科学研究的重要发展趋势和科技政策的重点支持领域,学科交叉已成为多个学科领域的研究热点。随着数据赋能和计算思维逐渐被学界和管理部门认可和实践,学科交叉测度引起了学界和科技管理部门的持续关注和重视。然而,目前尚无研究专门系统地讨论学科交叉测度的缘起、流程和应用场景等。[方法/过程]针对当前学科交叉测度综述研究的内容分布零散且逻辑性较弱等不足,本文立足科学建模视角从"场景解构、测度与实现和应用"的科学建模基本操作流程进行综述。[结果/结论]"场景解构"综述主要从引用、合作和发文展开,"测度与实现"综述主要从文献实体选择、文献实体归类和学科交叉指标构建展开;"应用"综述主要从构建并测度特定领域(Local)和全领域(Global)的学科交叉图谱以及评价学科交叉影响力等方面展开。最后,本文总结当前不足并对未来发展提出展望:"场景解构"有待于进一步扩充和细化;"测度与实现"有待于进一步细化和精确化;"应用"有待于进一步深化和扩展。

关键词： 学科交叉; 科学建模; 模型; 综述

本文引用格式

陈必坤 , 刘钰馨 , 白宽 , 王诗琴 , 王曰芬 . 基于科学建模的学科交叉测度研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022 , 66(18) : 126 -139 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.18.012

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance]As an important development trend of scientific research and a key supporting field of science and technology policy,interdisciplinarity has become a hot topic in many disciplines.Then,with the gradual recognition and practice of data empowerment and computing thinking by academic field and management departments,interdisciplinary measurement has attracted their continuous attention of academic field and science and technology management departments.However,the origin,process and application scenario of interdisciplinary measurement are not specifically and systematically discussed.[Method/Process]In view of the scattered content distribution and weak-logic review of current interdisciplinary measurement research,literature review of the basic operation process of modeling of science in this paper was implemented from the perspective of modeling of science,specifically from "split of social settings,measurement&implementation,applications" .[Result/Conclusion]Among them,review of "split of social settings" is mainly carried out from citing,cooperation and publishing;review of "measurement&implementation" is mainly carried out from selection of literature entities,literature entity classification and construction of interdisciplinary indicators;review of "applications" is mainly carried out from construction and measurement of local and global interdisciplinary maps and evaluation of interdisciplinary influences.Finally,this paper also summarizes current shortcomings and further research: "split of social settings" needs to be further expanded and refined; "measurement&implementation" needs to be further refined;and "applications" needs to be further deepened and extended.

Key words： interdisciplinarity; modeling of science; model; literature review

参考文献

[1] 曹嘉君,王曰芬,陈盛之,等.多学科交叉综合的研究领域内学科间分布状态与演化研究[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(5):459-468.
[2] WAGNER C, ROESSNER J, BOBB K, et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR):A review of the literature[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1):14-26.
[3] 张琳.国内外"交叉科学"研究现状及评述[J].科技管理研究, 2013, 33(12):251-254.
[4] 许海云,尹春晓,郭婷,等.学科交叉研究综述[J].图书情报工作, 2015, 59(5):119-127.
[5] 章成志,吴小兰.跨学科研究综述[J].情报学报, 2017, 36(5):523-535.
[6] ROUSSEAU R, ZHANG L, HU X. Knowledge integration:its meaning and measurement[C]//GLÄNZEL W, MOED H, SCHMOCH U, et al. Handbook of science and technology indicators. Basel:Springer-Nature, 2019:69-94.
[7] 顾秀丽,黄颖,孙蓓蓓,等.图书情报领域中的交叉科学研究:进展与展望[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(5):478-491.
[8] 张雪,张志强.学科交叉研究系统综述[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14):112-125.
[9] 黄颖,顾秀丽,孙蓓蓓,等.我国交叉科学研究的演进与展望——基于学术著作视角[J].图书情报知识, 2022, 39(1):61-72.
[10] SCHARNHORST A, BÖRNER K, BESSELAAR P. Models of science dynamics:encounters between complexity theory and information sciences[M]. Springer, 2012.
[11] 佩奇.模型思维[M].贾拥民,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社, 2019.
[12] 马亚雪,毛进,李纲.面向科学社会计算的数据组织与建模方法[J].中国图书馆学报, 2021, 47(1):76-87.
[13] 龚才春.模型思维:简化世界的人工智能模型[M].北京:电子工业出版社, 2021.
[14] 王卫军,姚畅,乔子越,等.基于词嵌入的国家自然科学基金学科交叉知识发现方法——以"人工智能"与"信息管理"为例[J].情报学报, 2021, 40(8):831-845.
[15] TORRES-SALINAS D, ROMERO-FRÍAS E, ARROYO-MACHADO W. Mapping the backbone of the Humanities through the eyes of Wikipedia[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(3):793-803.
[16] 吴小兰,章成志.基于社交媒体的高影响力跨学科用户发现研究[J].情报学报, 2017, 36(6):618-627.
[17] PIERCE S. Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(3):271-279.
[18] RAFOLS I, MEYER M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity:case studies in bionanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(2):263-287.
[19] GLÄNZEL W, SCHUBERT A. A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 56(3):357-367.
[20] BÖRNER K, KLAVANS R, PATEK M, et al. Design and update of a classification system:the UCSD map of science[J]. PLoS one, 2012, 7(7):1-10.
[21] WALTMAN L, ECK N J. A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2012, 63(12):2378-2392.
[22] 程孟夏.基于单篇论文学科分类号的跨学科研究——以人文社会科学为例[D].南京:南京理工大学, 2021.
[23] STIRLING A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the royal society interface, 2007, 4(15):707-719.
[24] PORTER A, RAFOLS I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary?measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3):719-745.
[25] PORTER A, CHUBIN D. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(3/4):161-176.
[26] CHEN K, LIANG C. Disciplinary interflow of library and information science in Taiwan[J]. Journal of library and information studies, 2004, 2(2):31-55.
[27] BRILLOUIN L, HELLWARTH R. Science and information theory[J]. Physics today, 1956, 9(12):39-40.
[28] 马瑞敏,闫晓慧,申楠.学科交叉直接测度研究[J].情报学报, 2019, 38(7):688-696.
[29] PORTER A, COHEN A, ROESSNER J, et al. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1):117-118.
[30] 和晋飞,房俊民.一个跨学科性测度指标:作者专业度[J].情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(5):42-45.
[31] LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals:diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1):87-100.
[32] LEYDESDORFF L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(9):1303-1319.
[33] 李长玲,纪雪梅,支岭,等.基于E-I指数的学科交叉程度分析——以情报学等5个学科为例[J].图书情报工作, 2011, 55(16):35-38.
[34] 吕海华,李江. 1987-2016年跨学科知识流动的规律:一个新的视角"学科势能"[J].图书情报知识, 2021, 38(4):125-135.
[35] 陈赛君,陈智高.领域交叉性分析指标与方法新探及其实证研究[J].情报学报, 2013, 32(11):1184-1195.
[36] ZHANG L, ROUSSEAU R, GLÄNZEL W. Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals:taking similarity between subject fields into account[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5):1257-1265.
[37] 张琳,孙蓓蓓,黄颖.跨学科合作模式下的交叉科学测度研究——以ESI社会科学领域高被引学者为例[J].情报学报, 2018, 37(3):231-242.
[38] LEYDESDORFF L. Diversity and interdisciplinarity:how can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance?[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(3):2113-2121.
[39] 杨良斌,周秋菊,金碧辉.基于文献计量的跨学科测度及实证研究[J].图书情报工作, 2009, 53(10):87-90.
[40] LEYDESDORFF L, WAGNER C, Bornmann L. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals:Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(1):255-269.
[41] WANG Q, SCHNEIDER J. Consistency and validity of interdisciplinarity measures[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2020, 1(1):239-263.
[42] 张琳,刘冬东,吕琦,等.论文学科交叉测度研究:从全部引文到章节引文[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(5):492-499.
[43] 章成志,徐庶睿,卢超.利用引文内容监测多学科交叉现象的方法与实证[J].图书情报工作, 2016, 60(19):108-115.
[44] 徐庶睿,卢超,章成志.术语引用视角下的学科交叉测度——以PLOS ONE上六个学科为例[J].情报学报, 2017, 36(8):809-820.
[45] 徐庶睿,章成志,卢超.利用引文内容进行主题级学科交叉类型分析[J].图书情报工作, 2017, 61(23):15-24.
[46] ZHANG L, JANSSENS F, LIANG L, et al. Journal cross-citation analysis for validation and improvement of journal-based subject classification in bibliometric research[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3):687-706.
[47] SHU F, JULIEN C, ZHANG L, et al. Comparing journal and paper level classifications of science[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(1):202-225.
[48] DE BRUIN R, MOED H. Delimitation of scientific subfields using cognitive words from corporate addresses in scientific publications[J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 26(1):65-80.
[49] GLÄNZEL W, SCHUBERT A, CZERWON H. An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 1999, 44(3):427-439.
[50] GLÄNZEL W, SCHUBERT A, SCHOEPFLIN U, et al. An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in journals covered by the SSCI database using reference analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 1999, 46(3):431-441.
[51] GARFIELD E, MALIN M, SMALL H. A system for automatic classification of scientific literature[J]. Journal of the indian institute of science, 1974, 57(2):61-74.
[52] SMALL H, SWEENEY E, GREENLEE E. Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. II. Mapping science[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(5/6):321-340.
[53] SMALL H. Visualizing science by citation mapping[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(9):799-813.
[54] KLAVANS R, BOYACK K. Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(3):475-499.
[55] BOYACK K. Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 79(1):27-44.
[56] BOYACK K, KLAVANS R. Including cited non-source items in a large-scale map of science:what difference does it make?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2014, 8(3):569-580.
[57] RUIZ-CASTILLO J, WALTMAN L. Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 9(1):102-117.
[58] LEYDESDORFF L, ROTOLO D, RAFOLS I. Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject Headings of PubMed[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(11):2239-2253.
[59] SKUPIN A, BIBERSTINE J, BÖRNER K. Visualizing the topical structure of the medical sciences:a self-organizing map approach[J]. PLoS one, 2013, 8(3):1-16.
[60] CHEN B, CHENG M, LI P, et al. Interdisciplinary research based on paper-level classifications of science-a preliminary case study of Chinese journals[C]//Proceedings of the 17th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics. Rome:ISSI, 2019.
[61] BOYACK K, KLAVANS R. Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(4):670-685.
[62] KLAVANS R, BOYACK K. Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(4):984-998.
[63] ZHANG G, DING Y, MILOJEVIC'S. Citation content analysis (CCA):A framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(7):1490-1503.
[64] SMALL H. Cited documents as concept symbols[J]. Social studies of science, 1978, 8(3):327-340.
[65] 胡志刚.全文引文分析:理论、方法与应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 2016.
[66] 祝清松,冷伏海.基于引文内容分析的高被引论文主题识别研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(1):39-49.
[67] LIU S, CHEN C. The differences between latent topics in abstracts and citation contexts of citing papers[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(3):627-639.
[68] 张琳,黄颖.交叉科学——测度、评价与应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 2019.
[69] RIJNSOEVER F, HESSELS L. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration[J]. Research policy, 2011, 40(3):463-472.
[70] HE B, DING Y, TANG J, et al. Mining diversity subgraph in multidisciplinary scientific collaboration networks:a meso perspective[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(1):117-128.
[71] KARLOVEC M, MLADENIC'D. Interdisciplinarity of scientific fields and its evolution based on graph of project collaboration and co-authoring[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1):433-454.
[72] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C, COSTA F. Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(11):2206-2222.
[73] WANG W, WU Y, PAN Y. An investigation of collaborations between top Chinese universities:a new quantitative approach[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2):1535-1545.
[74] ZHANG L, SUN B, CHINCHILLA-RODRÍGUEZ Z, et al. Interdisciplinarity and collaboration:on the relationship between disciplinary diversity in departmental affiliations and reference lists[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(1):271-291.
[75] ROUSSEAU R, LIU Y, YE Y. A preliminary investigation on diffusion through a layered system[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(2):177-191.
[76] LIU Y, ROUSSEAU R, GUNS R. A layered framework to study collaboration as a form of knowledge sharing and diffusion[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(3):651-664.
[77] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C, ZHANG L. A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output:the disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2018, 12(4):1182-1193.
[78] 张培,阮选敏,吕冬晴,等.人文社会科学学者的跨学科性对被引的影响研究[J].情报学报, 2019, 38(7):675-687.
[79] 邱均平,余厚强.跨学科发文视角下我国图书情报学跨学科研究态势分析[J].情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(5):5-10.
[80] 邓丹楠.期刊与单篇论文学科分类号视角下的全领域跨学科研究[D].南京:南京理工大学, 2021.
[81] 杨良斌.跨学科指标测度的数据集构建及数据预处理研究[J].图书情报工作, 2013, 57(11):90-95.
[82] 李长玲,刘非凡,郭凤娇.运用重叠社群可视化软件CFinder分析学科交叉研究主题——以情报学和计算机科学为例[J].图书情报工作, 2013, 57(7):75-80.
[83] 王连喜,曹树金.学科交叉视角下的网络舆情研究主题比较分析——以国内图书情报学和新闻传播学为例[J].情报学报, 2017, 36(2):159-169.
[84] PRICE D. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science, 1965, 149(3683):510-515.
[85] LEYDESDORFF L. Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 71(3):391-405.
[86] LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I. A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(2):348-362.
[87] LEYDESDORFF L, HAMMARFELT B, SALAH A. The structure of the Arts&Humanities citation index:a mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(12):2414-2426.
[88] RICHARDSON M. Citography:the visualization of nineteen thousand journals through their recent citations[J]. Research trends, 2012, 26(1):3-7.
[89] RICHARDSON M. Mapping the multidisciplinarity of the Arts&Humanities[J]. Research trends, 2013, 32(3):15-19.
[90] 赵星,谭旻,余小萍,等.我国文科领域知识扩散之引文网络探析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(5):59-67.
[91] CHEN B, WANG S, LIU Y, et al. Mapping the interdisciplinarity of the Arts, Humanities&Social Sciences by paper-level classifications of science[C]//Proceedings of the 18th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics. Leuven:ISSI, 2021.
[92] LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I, CHEN C. Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(12):2573-2586.
[93] CHEN C, LEYDESDORFF L. Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays:a new method of publication portfolio analysis[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(2):334-351.
[94] LARIVIōRE V, GINGRAS Y. On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(1):126-131.
[95] CHEN S, QIU J, ARSENAULT C, et al. Exploring the interdisciplinarity patterns of highly cited papers[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15(1):101124.
[96] 吕冬晴,阮选敏,李江,等.跨学科知识融合对D指数的影响[J].情报学报, 2022, 41(3):263-274.
[97] 李东,童寿传,李江.学科交叉与科学家学术影响力之间的关系研究[J].数据分析与知识发现,2018, 2(12):1-11.
[98] 张琳,孙蓓蓓,王贤文,等.交叉科学成果影响力研究:使用数据与引用数据视角[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(5):469-477.
[99] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C, COSTA F. Specialization versus diversification in research activities:the extent, intensity and relatedness of field diversification by individual scientists[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(3):1403-1418.
[100] WOOTEN K, ROSE R, OSTIR G, et al. Assessing and evaluating multidisciplinary translational teams:a mixed methods approach[J]. Evaluation&the health professions, 2014, 37(1):33-49.
[101] BARK R, KRAGT M, ROBSON B. Evaluating an interdisciplinary research project:lessons learned for organisations, researchers and funders[J]. International journal of project management, 2016, 34(8):1449-1459.
[102] 张慧玲,许海云,岳增慧,等.学科交叉期刊的影响力评价方法研究[J].情报学报, 2019, 38(10):1030-1040.
[103] 张琳,彭玉杰,杜会英,等.技术会聚:内涵、现状与测度——兼论与学科交叉的关系[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1):91-101.
[104] 张雪,张志强.美国科学基金会资助项目的学科交叉度演化规律及影响研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(12):122-132.
[105] DING Y, SONG M, HAN J, et al. Entitymetrics:measuring the impact of entities[J]. Plos one, 2013, 8(8):e71416.
[106] HVIDTFELDT R. The structure of interdisciplinary science[M]. Cham:Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
[107] REPCO A, SZOSTAK R. Interdisciplinary research:process and theory[M]. 4th ed. Los Angeles:SAGE publications, 2020.
[108] HERZOG C, HOOK D, KONKIEL S. Dimensions:bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2020, 1(1):387-395.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉