图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2022 , Vol. 66 >Issue 20: 62 - 72

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.20.007

北京大学信息管理系成立75周年学术专辑

参与智库活动对中国图情学者学术成果的影响探析

  • 申静 ,
  • 陈晓龙
展开
  • 北京大学信息管理系 北京 100871
申静,教授,博士,博士生导师,E-mail:jshen@pku.edu.cn;陈晓龙,硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2022-07-29

  修回日期: 2022-08-18

  网络出版日期: 2022-11-17

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目"创新驱动的中国特色新型智库知识服务发展机制研究"(项目编号: 18ATQ004)研究成果之一。

收起

The Impact of Participating in Think Tank Activities on the Academic Achievements of Chinese Library and Information Scholars

  • Shen Jing ,
  • Chen Xiaolong
Expand
  • Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received date: 2022-07-29

  Revised date: 2022-08-18

  Online published: 2022-11-17

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 中国图情学者是智库研究的主力军,探析参与智库活动对中国图情学者学术成果的影响,对于推动产学研合作、加强智库人才队伍建设具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 采用描述分析、多元回归分析和多期双重差分法,探析中国图情学者参与智库活动对其学术成果的影响。[结果/结论] 研究发现,中国图情学者参与智库活动的形式主要有任职学会委员、智库兼职、任职教育部专业委员、参与政府决策和参与智库发展论坛。其中,除了参与智库发展论坛,前两类形式的参与人数最多;智库兼职和任职教育部专业委员可以显著提高中国图情学者的学术成果数量,智库兼职可以显著增强其学术成果合作,任职教育部专业委员可以显著提升其学术成果质量;参与智库活动对中年组学者的学术成果有显著影响。

关键词： 智库活动; 学术成果; 中国图情学者; 产学研; 多期双重差分法

本文引用格式

申静 , 陈晓龙 . 参与智库活动对中国图情学者学术成果的影响探析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022 , 66(20) : 62 -72 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.20.007

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Chinese scholars of Library and Information Science (LIS) are the main force of studying think tanks. To analyze the influence of Chinese LIS scholars' participation in think tank activities on their academic achievements is of great significance for promoting the industry-university-research cooperation study and strengthening the think tanks' talent team construction. [Method/Process] Descriptive analysis, multiple regression analysis and multi-period differences-in-differences (DID) are used to explore the influence of Chinese LIS scholars' participation in think tank activities on their academic achievements. [Result/Conclusion] It is found that the main forms of Chinese LIS scholars' participation in think tank activities include taking office in society, affiliating in a think tank, severing as a discipline committee member of the Ministry of Education, participating in government decision-making and participating in think tank development forums. In addition to participating in think tank development forums, the first two forms have the largest number of participants. The academic achievements quantity of Chinese LIS scholars can be significantly increased by affiliating in a think tank and severing as a discipline committee member of the Ministry of Education. Affiliating in a think tank can significantly improve the academic achievements cooperation. The academic achievements quality can be significantly improved by severing as a discipline committee member of the Ministry of Education. Participation in think tank activities has a significant impact on the scholars' academic achievements in the middle-aged group.

Key words： think tank activities; academic achievements; Chinese LIS scholars; industry-university-research; multi-period differences-in-differences

参考文献

[1] MCGANN J G. 2020 global go to think tank index report[R]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2021.
[2] GARY B. Evidence-based policy making: what is it? how do we get it?[M]// World Scientific reference on Asia-Pacific trade policies. Singapore: World Scientific, 2020: 719-736.
[3] 聚智聚力,推动中国特色新型智库高质量发展[EB/OL]. [2022-05-26]. https://news.gmw.cn/2022-05/26/content_35764138.htm.
[4] 宋忠惠,郑军卫. 图书情报类期刊中的智库相关研究评价与分析[J]. 情报杂志,2016,35(8):145-150.
[5] 申静,蔡文君,毕煜. 智库研究的现状、热点与前沿[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(12):30-38.
[6] 王世伟. 试析情报工作在智库中的前端作用——以上海社会科学院信息研究所为例[J]. 情报资料工作,2011,32 (2):92-96.
[7] HONG W. Exploring the coping strategies of university library and information organizations in the construction of national think tanks[C]//International conference on arts, management, education and innovation. Ottawa: Clausius Scientific Press,2019:18-23.
[8] 智库:国家的不可或缺的"外脑"[EB/OL]. [2022-06-10]. https://www.sinoss.net/2014/0508/50049.html.
[9] 郭华桥. 研究型大学智库建设模式与困境突围——基于"学者"使命的视角[J]. 中国高教研究,2014,30 (5):50-57.
[10] BRATERSKY A. Think tanks during Donald Trump’s presidency[J]. USA & Canada: economics, politics, culture,2020,50(6):92-108.
[11] 毛丹.多元协同视角下图书馆学会参与社会智库服务策略研究[J]. 河南图书馆学刊,2021,41(7):95-96,99.
[12] 仇笳熙,张静一. 科学基金项目的成果跟踪与管理初探[J]. 科研管理,2017,38(S1):695-699.
[13] 教育部印发《关于破除高校哲学社会科学研究评价中"唯论文"不良导向的若干意见》的通知[EB/OL]. [2022-06-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A13/moe_2557/s3103/202012/t20201215_505588.html.
[14] 曾文. 数字时代人文社会科学的正确评价导向——以数字学术成果的评价问题为中心[J].图书馆论坛,2021,41(2):46-55.
[15] 姚乐野,王阿陶. 我国高校人文社会科学学术成果的国际影响力分析——基于"985"高校在Web of Science期刊发文引文的研究[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,61(1):111-120.
[16] 严炜炜,温馨,曹灿瑜. 学术社交网络中iSchool高影响力科研成果特征分析[J]. 情报科学,2021,39(7):23-29,37.
[17] 张琳,杜会英,尚媛媛,等. 性别视角下国家自然科学基金项目负责人的成果产出与影响研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报,2021,11(3):110-120.
[18] ZHANG M, ZHANG G, LIU Y, et al. Scientists’ genders and international academic collaboration: an empirical study of Chinese universities and research institutes[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2020, 14(4): 101068.
[19] TRUONG H T, LE H M, DO D A, et al. Impact of governance factors over lecturers’ scientific research output: an empirical evidence[J]. Education sciences, 2021, 11(9): 553.
[20] LERNER J Y. Getting the message across: evaluating think tank influence in Congress[J]. Public choice, 2018, 175(3): 347-366.
[21] CHRISTENSEN J, HOLST C. How do advocacy think tanks relate to academic knowledge? the case of Norway[J]. Scandinavian political studies, 2020, 43(3): 223-239.
[22] WEAVER R K. The changing world of think tanks[J]. PS: political science & politics, 1989, 22(3): 563-578.
[23] PLANELLS-ARTIGOT E, ORTIGOSA-BLANCh A, MARTÍ-SÁNCHEZ M. Bridging fields: a comparative study of the presence of think tanks[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2021, 162: 120377.
[24] 黄胜杰,张毅. 我国产学研合作的组织模式及其网络特性探析[J]. 高等工程教育研究,2002,20(6):30-33.
[25] VAN LOOY B, RANGA M, CALLAERT J, et al. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-Effect[J]. Research policy, 2004, 33(3): 425-441.
[26] BUENSTORF G. Is commercialization good or bad for science? individual-level evidence from the max planck society[J]. Research policy, 2009, 38(2): 281-292.
[27] 聂峰英,孙明杰,张海燕,等. 国际比较视域下科技智库多主体运营模式研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2020,43(10):74-80.
[28] 宋鹭,安怡宁. 世界顶级智库如何开展和保障高质量研究——以彼得森国际经济研究所为例[J]. 智库理论与实践,2021,6(1):77-83.
[29] 高浩然. 社会科学领域的学术研究与智库活动——以美国经济学界为例[D]. 北京:北京大学, 2020.
[30] FEDDERKE J W, GOLDSCHMIDT M. Does massive funding support of researchers work? evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative[J]. Research policy, 2015, 44(2): 467-482.
[31] 马缨. 行政职务对我国科研人员论文发表的影响[J]. 科学学研究,2017,35(11):1614-1622.
[32] MCGANN J G. Global trends and transitions in think tanks, politics, and policy advice in the age of policy dilemmas and disruptions[M]//Consensus or conflict? Singapore: Springer, 2021: 179-190.
[33] PAUTZ H. Revisiting the think-tank phenomenon[J]. Public policy and administration, 2011, 26(4): 419-435.
[34] 周湘智. 主管部门介入生产:智库成果质量控制的有效模式[J]. 智库理论与实践,2021,6(5):8-13.
[35] MENDIZABAL E. From perception to objectivity: how think tanks’ search for credibility may lead to a more rigorous assessment of research quality[C]//ERIKA K M, ROBERT T, MATTHEW L, et.al. Transforming research excellence. Cape Town: African minds, 2020:178-199.
[36] 王洪才,毛芳才. 我国高校学术委员会的生成逻辑与优化路径[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,96 (1):122-130.
[37] JIA R, NIE H, XIAO W. Power and publications in Chinese academia[J]. Journal of comparative economics, 2019, 47(4): 792-805.
[38] MCCRAIN J. Revolving door lobbyists and the value of congressional staff connections[J]. The journal of politics, 2018,80(4):1369-1383.
[39] CAMPOS R, LEON F, MCQUILLIN B. Lost in the storm: the academic collaborations that went missing in murricane ISSAC[J]. The economic journal, 2018, 128(610):995-1018.
[40] 王战平,朱宸良,汪玲,等.生态系统视角下虚拟学术社区科研人员合作影响因素研究[J].情报理论与实践,2021,44(4):119-129,98.
[41] 郑荣,唐伟航,杨竞雄,等. 多元主体协同视角下的智库影响力提升机制研究[J]. 情报科学,2020,38(9):63-68.
[42] ZHAO D, STROTMANN A. Information science during the first decade of the Web: an enriched author co-citation analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(6): 916-937.
[43] 邱均平,周春雷. 发文量和h指数结合的高影响力作者评选方法研究——以图书情报学为例的实证分析[J]. 图书馆论坛,2008,28(6):44-49.
[44] BOJKO M M, KNAPIŃSKA A, TOMCZYŃSKA A. Academic entrepreneurship and the research productivity in Poland[J]. Industry and innovation, 2021, 28(4): 486-506.
[45] UNESCO. Science, technology and gender: an international report[R]. Paris: Unesco Publishing, 2007.
[46] 张晓娜. 基于中文核心期刊的图书情报学科学者的学术年龄研究[J]. 情报探索,2019,33(1):62-66.
[47] ANDREA B, PAOLA B, LUCA S. The research productivity of universities. a multilevel and multidisciplinary analysis on European institutions[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021,15(2):101129.
[48] LARIVIÈRE V, NI C, GINGRAS Y, et al. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science[J]. Nature, 2013, 504(7479): 211-213.
[49] CARD D, ASHENFELTER O. Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs[J]. Review of economics and statistics, 1985, 67(4): 648-660.
[50] BECK T, LEVINE R, LEVKOV A. Big bad banks? the winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J]. The journal of finance, 2010, 65(5): 1637-1667.
[51] World Health Organization?.World health day 2012: ageing and health: toolkit for event organizers[R/OL]. [2022-07-01]. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70840.
[52] PETERSEN A M. Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(34): E4671-E4680.
[53] 秦佳良,贺明华. 学者开放性和学术影响力[J]. 科学学研究,2020,38(5):769-778,796.
[54] NAVEED A, SULERI A. Making ’impact factor’ impactful: universities, think tanks and policy research in Pakistan[R]. Islamabad: Sustainable Development Policy Institute, 2022.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉