图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2022 , Vol. 66 >Issue 22: 106 - 118

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.22.010

知识组织

文化遗产领域知识纲要研究

  • 侯西龙 ,
  • 王晓光 ,
  • 翁梦娟
展开
  • 1 曲阜师范大学传媒学院 日照 276826;
    2 武汉大学文化遗产智能计算实验室 武汉 430072;
    3 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072
侯西龙,副教授,博士;翁梦娟,博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2022-06-18

  修回日期: 2022-09-14

  网络出版日期: 2022-12-02

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目"文化遗产图像资源关联数据集成与叙事化呈现研究"（项目编号：21CTQ041）和湖北省科技厅重点研发计划项目"文旅大数据关键技术研发与应用示范"（项目编号：2020BAB117）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on Knowledge Outline of the Cultural Heritage Domain

  • Hou Xilong ,
  • Wang Xiaoguang ,
  • Weng Mengjuan
Expand
  • 1 School of Communication, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826;
    2 Intellectual Computing Laboratory for Cultural Heritage, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    3 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received date: 2022-06-18

  Revised date: 2022-09-14

  Online published: 2022-12-02

Fold

摘要

［目的/意义］ 面向文化遗产领域的知识分析研究，对领域知识建模、知识组织、智慧数据资源建设等具有重要意义。［方法/过程］ 为明确文化遗产领域知识结构与特征，基于对领域本体的计算与分析，系统剖析文化遗产领域核心共享概念以及领域知识关联关系，提出并构建文化遗产领域知识纲要。［结果/结论］ 文化遗产领域核心共享概念包括领域对象与实体、类型与概念、时间与空间、事件与活动、文献与作品、代理者等内容，领域知识关联关系丰富多样且较为复杂。研究结论有助于更全面地理解与认识文化遗产领域知识体系，指导领域本体开发与知识建模，促进领域知识的有效组织与管理。

关键词： 文化遗产; 知识纲要; 本体; 知识组织; 知识关联

本文引用格式

侯西龙 , 王晓光 , 翁梦娟 . 文化遗产领域知识纲要研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022 , 66(22) : 106 -118 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.22.010

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Knowledge analysis of cultural heritage is of great significance to domain knowledge modeling, knowledge organization and the construction of smart data resources. [Method/Process] To clarify the knowledge structure and characteristics of cultural heritage, this article systematically analyzed the core shared concepts and domain knowledge association in the field of cultural heritage based on the computing and analysis of domain ontologies. Meanwhile, the knowledge outline of cultural heritage was proposed and constructed. [Result/Conclusion] The core shared concepts of cultural heritage domain mainly include objects and entities, types and concepts, time and places, events and activities, documents and works, agent, etc. Knowledge association and relationships in the field of cultural heritage are extremely rich, various and complex. The results are helpful to understanding the knowledge system of cultural heritage more comprehensively, and provide insight into the domain ontology development and knowledge modeling. Furthermore, this study will promote the knowledge organization and management of cultural heritage more effectively.

Key words： cultural heritage; knowledge outline; ontology; knowledge organization; knowledge association

参考文献

[1] 朱晓峰,蒋旭牧,张卫.领域知识组织研究的历史演化与未来展望[J].情报资料工作,2021,42(5):23-31.
[2] HYVONEN E. Using the semantic Web in digital humanities:shift from data publishing to data-analysis and serendipitous knowledge discovery[J]. Semantic Web, 2020, 11(1):187-193.
[3] 马文峰,杜小勇. 关于知识组织体系的若干理论问题[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2007,33(2):13-17,46.
[4] 王子舟. 图书馆学的基本概念与核心概念[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2001,27(3):7-11.
[5] DADZIE A S, ROWE M. Approaches to visualising linked data:a survey[J] Semantic Web, 2011, 2(2):89-124.
[6] 陈涛,张靖.本体服务中心框架设计与探索[J].图书馆杂志,2022,41(3):118-125.
[7] 陈果,陈晶,肖璐.词汇语义链:领域分析视角下的词汇语义挖掘理论框架[J].情报理论与实践,2022,45(4):170-176,183.
[8] TROULLINOU G, KONDYLAKIS H, DASKALAKI E, et al. Ontology understanding without tears:the summarization approach[J]. Semantic Web, 2017,8(6):797-815.
[9] FREIRE N, VALK S D. Automated interpretability of linked data ontologies:an evaluation within the cultural heritage domain[C]//2019 IEEE international conference on big data. Los Angeles:IEEE, 2019:3072-3079.
[10] MAHRIA B B, CHAKER I, ZAHI A. Measuring design complexity of cultural heritage ontologies[C]//12th international joint conference on knowledge engineering and ontology development. Setúbal:Scite Press, 2020:133-140.
[11] DIAZ-CORONA D, LACASTA J, LATRE M A, et al. Profiling of knowledge organisation systems for the annotation of linked data cultural resources[J]. Information systems,2019,84:17-28.
[12] ASPRINO L, CARRIERO V A, PRESUTTI V. Extraction of common conceptual components from multiple ontologies[C]//Proceedings of the 11th on knowledge capture conference. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2021:185-192.
[13] MARCONDES C H. Towards a vocabulary to implement culturally relevant relationships between digital collections in heritage institutions[J]. Knowledge organization, 2020, 47(2):122-137.
[14] 贾君枝,崔西燕.人物本体词表之间的互操作及分类体系构建[J].情报学报,2019,38(7):731-741.
[15] 夏翠娟.文化记忆资源的知识融通:从异构资源元数据应用纲要到一体化本体设计[J].图书情报知识,2021(1):53-65.
[16] 苏新宁.面向知识服务的领域知识组织纵论[J].情报学报,2022,41(9):889-899.
[17] MORAITOU E, ALIPRANTIS J, CHRISTODOULOU Y, et al. Semantic bridging of cultural heritage disciplines and tasks[J]. Heritage, 2019, 2(1):611-630.
[18] CARRIERO V A, GANGEMI A, MANCINELLI M L, et al. Pattern-based design applied to cultural heritage knowledge graphs[J]. Semantic Web, 2021,12(2):313-357.
[19] VLACHIDIS A, BIKAKIS A, KYRIAKI-MANESSI D, et al. Semantic representation and enrichment of cultural heritage information for fostering reinterpretation and reflection on the European history[C]//Digital cultural heritage. Cham:Springer, 2018:91-103.
[20] LODI G, ASPRINO L, NUZZOLESE A G, et al. Semantic Web for cultural heritage valorisation[C]//Data analytics in digital humanities. Cham:Springer, 2017:3-37.
[21] LOMBARDO V, Damiano R, PIZZO A. Drammar:a comprehensive ontological resource on drama[C]//International semantic Web conference. Cham:Springer, 2018:103-118.
[22] CARBONI N, LIVIO D L. An ontological approach to the description of visual and iconographical representations[J]. Heritage, 2019,2(2):1191-1210.
[23] 贾君枝.词表生态系统:构成要素及关联关系[J].中国图书馆学报,2020,46(4):60-68.
[24] FERNANDEX-LOPEZ M, POVEDA-VILLALON M, SUAREZ-FIGUEROA M, et al. Why are ontologies not reused across the same domain?[J]. Journal of Web semantics, 2019,57:100492.
[25] PRESUTTI V, LODI G, NUZZOLESE A, et al. The role of ontology design patterns in linked data projects[C]//International conference on conceptual modeling. Cham:Springer, 2016:113-121.
[26] 贾君枝.资源描述中的词表重用类型与实现方式[J].中国图书馆学报,2021,47(4):76-85.
[27] HALLER A, POLLERES A. Are we better off with just one ontology on the Web?[J]. Semantic Web, 2020,11(1):87-99.
[28] 潘有能,刘朝霞.本体映射技术在关联数据中的应用研究[J].情报科学,2015,33(1):54-56,62.
[29] SUGIMOTO S, WIJESUNDARA C, MIHARA T, et al. Modelling cultural entities in diverse domains for digital archives[C]//Information and knowledge organisation in digital humanities:global perspectives. London:Taylor & Francis, 2022:25-42.
[30] 贾君枝,李衎.传统知识组织系统的关联数据化发展[J].数字图书馆论坛,2020(3):33-40.
[31] 王晓光,侯西龙,程航航,等.敦煌壁画叙词表构建与关联数据发布[J].中国图书馆学报, 2020,46(4):69-84.
[32] 苗孟荍,黄明玉,潜伟.中国文物纹饰叙词表构建探索——以兽面纹为例[J].自然与文化遗产研究, 2019,4(12):96-101.
[33] 高劲松,陈雅倩,付家炜.基于对象——事件的文物时空数据模型构建研究[J].现代情报,2021, 41(6):88-96,148.
[34] 陈金菊,欧石燕,林泽斐.典型通用事件语义模型比较分析研究[J].现代情报,2021,41(2):55-64,77.
[35] DOERR M. Ontologies for cultural heritage[M]//Handbook on ontologies. Berlin:Springer, 2009:463-486.
[36] 陈涛,张永娟,单蓉蓉,等. 书目数据语义化知识模型构建与关联研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019,38(1):65-73.
[37] 范炜.书目资源的统一概念模型LRM论纲[J].文献与数据学报,2019,1(4):46-61.
[38] DOBRESKI B, KWASNIK B H. Dimensions of personhood in cultural heritage:who (or what) gets to be called a person?[J]. Education for information, 2021,37(4):409-426.
[39] 文庭孝,刘晓英,刘进军. 知识关联的理论基础研究[J].图书馆,2010(4):9-11.
[40] TARTIR S, ARPINAR I B, MOORE M, et al. OntoQA:Metric-based ontology quality analysis[C]//Proceeding of IEEE workshop on knowledge acquisition from distributed, autonomous, semantically heterogeneous data and knowledge sources. Houston:IEEE, 2005.
[41] 洪亮,马费成.面向大数据管理决策的知识关联分析与知识大图构建[J].管理世界, 2022,38(1):207-219.
[42] 蒋勋,朱晓峰,肖连杰.大数据环境领域知识组织方法研究[J].情报资料工作,2021,42(5):6-13.
[43] 董桂存,姜广强.扩展FRBR模型作品概念的分析与研究[J].图书馆学研究,2015(7):69-73.
[44] 李章超,何琳.文化遗产语义组织研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(7):4-12.
[45] ARMIN H, AXEL P. Are we better off with just one ontology on the Web?[J]. Semantic Web, 2020,11(1):87-99.
[46] STAAB S, STUDER R. Handbook on ontologies[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2009:463-486.
[47] 李旭晖,秦书倩,吴燕秋,等.从计算角度看大规模数据中的知识组织[J].图书情报知识,2018(6):94-102.
[48] 王娜,蒋智慧.动态本体构建的国内外研究现状综述[J].现代情报,2020,40(4):159-166.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉