图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2023 , Vol. 67 >Issue 11: 25 - 38

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.11.003

理论研究

社交网络平台用户共有信息披露中的集体隐私应对行为研究

  • 冯亚飞 ,
  • 孙永强
展开
  • 1 华南师范大学商学院 汕尾 516625;
    2 武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072
冯亚飞,博士。

收稿日期: 2022-10-24

  修回日期: 2022-12-31

  网络出版日期: 2023-06-19

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金项目“顺序决策、需求资源与差别组态：探究社交网络用户的持续使用、终止与间歇性中止行为的作用机制”（项目编号：71904149）和国家自然科学基金项目“维基情境下的治理模式、知识属性与知识整合：基于匹配理论与构型理论的视角”（项目编号：71974148）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on Collective Privacy Coping Behavior in Co-Owned Information Disclosure of Users on Social Network Platforms

  • Feng Yafei ,
  • Sun Yongqiang
Expand
  • 1 School of Business, South China Normal University, Shanwei 516625;
    2 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received date: 2022-10-24

  Revised date: 2022-12-31

  Online published: 2023-06-19

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]共有信息分享或披露作为社交网络平台用户一种常见的信息行为，在越来越普遍的同时也引发集体隐私问题。深入理解该行为对于提升用户的共有信息分享体验具有重要意义。[方法/过程]以压力源—压力反应—应对策略—行为后果为研究框架，收集443个社交网络平台用户的数据，采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)探究社交网络平台用户共有信息披露情境下的集体隐私应对策略及其行为后果。[结果/结论]研究发现，共有信息披露情境下，集体隐私问题作为一种压力源（个人隐私担忧、他人隐私担忧和关系隐私担忧）会使个体产生负面的心理压力（个人隐私疲惫和他人隐私疲惫）。个体会根据自己的资源和能力，通过两种不同的应对策略（适应性应对策略和非适应性应对策略）消除负面的心理状态，而不同的应对策略可能会导致不同的行为后果。适应性应对策略会导致用户的共有信息披露行为，而非适应性应对策略则会导致用户的共有信息持留行为。此外，用户的信息所有权感知能够调节其应对集体隐私压力的策略。具体来说，个人信息所有权感知增强个人隐私疲惫对适应性应对策略和非适应性应对策略的积极影响，他人信息所有权感知增强他人隐私疲惫对适应性应对策略的积极影响。在此拓展压力应对理论的理论内涵，丰富信息披露的研究情境，同时为社交平台开发者和设计者等主体提升用户的共有信息分享体验带来一些实践启示。

关键词： 社交网络平台; 共有信息披露; 集体隐私应对; 信息所有权; 压力应对理论

本文引用格式

冯亚飞 , 孙永强 . 社交网络平台用户共有信息披露中的集体隐私应对行为研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023 , 67(11) : 25 -38 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.11.003

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Understanding the co-owned information disclosure behavior of social network platform users and their collective privacy coping strategies is of great significance to improve users’ coowned information sharing experience. [Method/Process] Based on the framework of stressor - strain - coping strategy - behavioral consequence, this study collected the data of 443 social network platform users, and used the method of PLS-SEM to explore the collective privacy coping strategies and behavioral consequences of social network platform users in the context of co-owned information disclosure. [Result/Conclusion] The results show that in the context of co-owned information disclosure, collective privacy problems as a source of stress (i.e., personal privacy concerns, others’ privacy concerns and relationship privacy concerns) will lead to individual negative psychological stress (i.e., personal privacy fatigue and others’ privacy fatigue). Individuals can eliminate such negative psychological states through two different coping strategies (i.e., adaptive coping strategies and maladaptive coping strategies) according to their resources and abilities, and different coping strategies may lead to different behavioral consequences. Adaptive coping strategies contribute to individuals’ co-owned information disclosure, while maladaptive coping strategies lead to individuals’ co-owned information withholding. In addition, individual’s perception of information ownership moderates coping strategies of collective privacy stress. Specifically, the perception of personal information ownership enhances the positive impact of personal privacy fatigue on adaptive coping strategies and maladaptive coping strategies, and the perception of others’ information ownership enhances the positive impact of others’ privacy fatigue on adaptive coping strategies. This study expands the theoretical connotation of stress coping theory, enriches the research context of information disclosure, and brings some practical implications for social platform developers and designers to improve users’ co-owned information sharing experience.

Key words： social network platform; co-owned information disclosure; collective privacy coping; information ownership; stress coping theory

参考文献

[1] TREPTE S, SCHARKOW M, DIENLIN T. The privacy calculus contextualized:the influence of affordances[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2020, 104(3):106-115.
[2] 李伟娟,林升栋.社交媒体隐私侵犯后的信任修复机制探究[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(17):33-44.
[3] GUO J, LI N, WU Y, et al. Examining help requests on social networking sites:integrating privacy perception and privacy calculus perspectives[J]. Electronic commerce research and applications, 2020, 39:100828.
[4] JAMES T L, WALLACE L, WARKENTIN M, et al. Exposing others'information on online social networks (OSNs):perceived shared risk, its determinants, and its influence on OSN privacy control use[J]. Information & management, 2017, 54(7):851-865.
[5] KOOHIKAMALI M, PEAK D A, PRYBUTOK V R. Beyond self-disclosure:disclosure of information about others in social network sites[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2017, 69:29-42.
[6] THOMPSON N, BRINDLEY J. Who are you talking about?Contrasting determinants of online disclosure about self or others[J]. Information technology & people, 2020, 34(3):999-1017.
[7] BÉLANGER F, JAMES T L. A theory of multilevel information privacy management for the digital era[J]. Information systems research, 2020, 31(2):510-536.
[8] 池毛毛,王俊晶,王伟军.突发重大疫情下基层政府信任对公民信息不披露意愿的影响机制研究[J].情报学报, 2021, 40(6):666-678.
[9] CHOI C F, JIANG Z. Trading friendship for value:An investigation of collective privacy concerns in social application usage[C]//Proceedings of thirty fourth international conference on information systems. Milano:AIS Electronic Library, 2013:1-10.
[10] XU H. Reframing privacy 2.0 in online social network[J]. Journal of constitutional law, 2012, 14:1077-1102.
[11] DAVIS J F. Property rights to consumer information[J]. Journal of direct marketing, 1997, 11(3):32-43.
[12] LIPINSKI T A, BRITZ J. Rethinking the ownership of information in the 21st century:Ethical implications[J]. Ethics and information technology, 2000, 2(1):49-71.
[13] FANG X, BENAMATI J, LEDERER A L. Coping with rapid information technology change in different national cultures[J]. European journal of information systems, 2011, 20(5):560-573.
[14] LAZARUS R S, FOLKMAN S. Stress, appraisal, and coping[M]. New York:Springer, 1984.
[15] 张艳丰,刘亚丽,彭丽徽.硬规则下移动社交媒体用户隐私政策阅读感知测度实证研究[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(4):49-60.
[16] ELLISON N B, STEINFIELD C, LAMPE C. Connection strategies:social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices[J]. New media & society, 2011, 13(6):873-892.
[17] BLOUSTEIN E J. Group privacy:the right to huddle[J]. Rutgers law journal, 1976(8):219-243.
[18] RAVINDRAN T, YEOW KUAN A C, HOE LIAN D G. Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(11):2306-2321.
[19] FURNELL S, THOMSON K L. Recognising and addressing'security fatigue'[J]. Computer fraud & security, 2009(11):7-11.
[20] 王珉,侯贵生,尤志珑.网络用户隐私疲劳的影响因素与行为选择研究——基于S-S-O理论与扎根理论[J].情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(9):149-154, 128.
[21] CHOI H, PARK J, JUNG Y. The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2018, 81(4):42-51.
[22] DHIR A, KAUR P, CHEN S, et al. Antecedents and consequences of social media fatigue[J]. International journal of information management, 2019, 48:193-202.
[23] KEITH M J, MAYNES C, LOWRY P B, et al. Privacy fatigue:the effect of privacy control complexity on consumer electronic information disclosure[J]. Social science electronic publishing, 2014, 7(4):14-17.
[24] HOPSTAKEN J F, VAN DER LINDEN D, BAKKER A B, et al. A multifaceted investigation of the link between mental fatigue and task disengagement[J]. Psychophysiology, 2015, 52(3):305-315.
[25] BARLETTE Y, JAOUEN A, BAILLETTE P. Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) as reversed IT adoption:insights into managers'coping strategies[J]. International journal of information management, 2021, 56:102-112.
[26] D'ARCY J, TEH P L. Predicting employee information security policy compliance on a daily basis:the interplay of securityrelated stress, emotions, and neutralization[J]. Information & management, 2019, 56(7):103-151.
[27] JOINSON A N, PAINE C B. Self-disclosure, privacy and the Internet[J]. The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology, 2007(5):237-252.
[28] DAVIS J F. Property rights to consumer information[J]. Journal of direct marketing, 1997, 11(3):32-43.
[29] 刘裕,周毅,农颜清.网络信息服务平台用户个人信息安全风险及其治理——基于117个APP隐私政策文本的内容分析[J].图书情报工作, 2022, 66(5):33-43.
[30] MILNE G R, BAHL S. Are there differences between consumers'and marketers'privacy expectations? a segment-and technologylevel analysis[J]. Journal of public policy & marketing, 2010, 29(1):138-149.
[31] GABISCH J A, MILNE G R. The impact of compensation on information ownership and privacy control[J]. Journal of consumer marketing, 2014, 31(1):13-26.
[32] TARAFDAR M, MAIER C, LAUMER S, et al. Explaining the link between technostress and technology addiction for social networking sites:a study of distraction as a coping behavior[J]. Information systems journal, 2020, 30(1):96-124.
[33] BONO J E, GLOMB T M, SHEN W, et al. Building positive resources:effects of positive events and positive reflection on work stress and health[J]. Academy of management journal, 2013, 56(6):1601-1627.
[34] GAUDIOSO F, TUREL O, GALIMBERTI C. The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating technostressors into adverse job outcomes[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2017, 69(4):189-196.
[35] LIN S, LIN J, LUO X R, et al. Juxtaposed effect of social media overload on discontinuous usage intention:the perspective of stress coping strategies[J]. Information processing & management, 2021, 58(1):102-119.
[36] CHO H, LI P, GOH Z H. Privacy risks, emotions, and social media:a coping model of online privacy[J]. ACM transactions on computer-human interaction, 2020, 27(6):1-28.
[37] LI P, CHO H, GOH Z H. Unpacking the process of privacy management and self-disclosure from the perspectives of regulatory focus and privacy calculus[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2019, 41(8):114-125.
[38] XIAO L, MOU J. Social media fatigue-technological antecedents and the moderating roles of personality traits:the case of WeChat[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2019, 101:297-310.
[39] LUTZ C, HOFFMANN C P, RANZINI G. Data capitalism and the user:an exploration of privacy cynicism in Germany[J]. New media & society, 2020, 22(7):1168-1187.
[40] DINEV T, HART P.An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions[J]. Information systems research, 2006, 17(1):61-80.
[41] CONSTANT D, KIESLER S, SPROULL L. What's mine is ours, or is it?a study of attitudes about information sharing[J]. Information systems research, 1994, 5(4):400-421.
[42] CHO H, KNIJNENBURG B, KOBSA A, et al. Collective privacy management in social media:a cross-cultural validation[J]. ACM transactions on computer-human interaction (TOCHI), 2018, 25(3):1-33.
[43] TSAI H T, BAGOZZI R P. Contribution behavior in virtual communities:cognitive, emotional, and social influences[J]. MIS quarterly, 2014, 38(1):143-164.
[44] FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1981, 18(1):39-50.
[45] HSU C L, LIN J C C. Acceptance of blog usage:the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation[J]. Information & management, 2008, 45(1):65-74.
[46] JIANG J J, KLEIN G, CARR C L. Measuring information system service quality:SERVQUAL from the other side[J]. MIS quarterly, 2002:145-166.
[47] PODSAKOFF P M, MACKENZIE S B, LEE J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research:a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2003, 88(5):879-903.
[48] LIANG H, SARAF N, HU Q, et al. Assimilation of enterprise systems:the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management[J]. MIS quarterly, 2007, 31(1):59-87.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉