情报研究

科学数据共享意愿影响因素实证与仿真研究

  • 支凤稳 ,
  • 张萌
展开
  • 1 河北大学管理学院 保定 071002;
    2 中国科学技术信息研究所 北京 100038;
    3 河北省数字治理与协同治理研究基地 保定 071002
支凤稳,副教授,博士。

收稿日期: 2022-12-30

  修回日期: 2023-04-11

  网络出版日期: 2023-07-11

基金资助

本文系河北省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目“元宇宙时代科学数据共享模式及其应用研究”(项目编号:BJS2022027)研究成果之一。

Empirical and Simulation Research on the Influencing Factors of Scientific Data Sharing Willingness

  • Zhi Fengwen ,
  • Zhang Meng
Expand
  • 1 School of Management, Hebei University, Baoding 071002;
    2 China Institute of Science and Technology Information, Beijing 100038;
    3 Collaborative Digital Governance Research Base of Hebei, Baoding 071002

Received date: 2022-12-30

  Revised date: 2023-04-11

  Online published: 2023-07-11

摘要

[目的/意义] 旨在探明科学数据共享意愿的影响因素、作用机理及动态演化规律,以期为后续相关研究与实践提供参考。[方法/过程] 基于刺激机体反应理论,构建科学数据共享意愿的理论模型。利用问卷调查获取 435份有效样本,并通过结构方程模型进行实证检验,确定变量间路径系数。在此基础上,构建系统动力学模型,对变量间关系的动态演化规律进行仿真。[结果/结论] “信任 → 共享态度 → 共享意愿”路径是驱动科学数据共享的基本逻辑,互惠、社会互动、数据质量对信任有显著正向影响,其效应排序为“互惠 > 数据质量 > 社会互动”。同时,感知行为控制对共享意愿有显著正向影响,而主观规范对共享意愿的影响不显著。不同情境下的信任速率、初始感知行为控制、初始共享意愿均对科学数据共享意愿产生影响。最后,针对主要研究结论提出促进科学数据共享的建议。

本文引用格式

支凤稳 , 张萌 . 科学数据共享意愿影响因素实证与仿真研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023 , 67(13) : 111 -121 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.13.012

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The study aims to reveal the influencing factors, working mechanism and dynamic evolution law of scientific data sharing willingness to provide a reference for the following-up research and practice. [Method/Process] A theoretical model of scientific data sharing willingness was constructed based on the stimulus organism response theory. 435 valid questionnaire samples were empirically tested via structural equation model to get the path coefficients among variables, based on which a system dynamics model was conducted to emulate the dynamic evolution of the relationship among variables. [Result/Conclusion] The path of “trust→sharing attitude →sharing willingness” is the basic logic pushing scientific data sharing forward. Mutual benefits, social interaction and data quality have remarkable positive influence on trust, and their effects are ranked as “mutual benefits>data quality> social interaction”. Meanwhile, the perceived behavioral control has prominent positive influence on sharing willingness while subjective norms are insignificant. Under different circumstances, the trust rate, the initial perceived behavior control and the initial degree of sharing willingness all exert influences on scientific data sharing willingness. Finally, suggestions of promoting scientific data sharing were proposed based on main research conclusions.

参考文献

[1] 赵丽梅, 刘雯. 基于文献计量的我国科学数据共享研究态势分析[J]. 图书馆研究, 2022, 52(5): 117-128.
[2] Science Europe. Practical guide sustainable to research date[EB/ OL]. [2023-01-14]. http://www.scienceeurope.org/media/b3odxx3s/se-practical-guide-sustainable-research-data.pdf.
[3] 王勋荣, 蒲筱哥. 高校科学数据共享影响因素与策略研究[J]. 图书馆, 2021(10): 41-46, 62.
[4] 支凤稳, 张萌, 赵梦凡, 等. 双路径视角下科学数据共享行为的影响因素研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2021, 11(6): 40-50.
[5] 何琳, 常颖聪. 科研人员数据共享意愿研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2014(5): 125-131.
[6] 王丹丹, 刘清华, 王晓梅. 科学数据共享行为影响因素的元分析 [J]. 图书馆学研究, 2021(22): 74-84.
[7] 沈婷婷. 主观感知对研究者科学数据共享意愿的影响[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(12): 158-162.
[8] MLTGEN W Z, AKDENIZ E, KATSANIDOU A, et al. Factors influencing the data sharing behavior of researchers in sociology and political science[J]. Journal of documentation, 2018, 74(5): 1053-1073.
[9] 张晋朝. 我国高校科研人员科学数据共享意愿研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(10): 25-30.
[10] 刘嫣. 高校科学数据共享主要影响因素研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2019.
[11] BEARTH A, SIEGRIST M. Psychological factors that determine people’s willingness-to-share genetic data for research[J]. Clinical genetics, 2020, 97(3): 483-491.
[12] 罗晓兰, 李明. 国内期刊论文科学数据共享政策与投稿意愿研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017(8): 696-703.
[13] MEHRABIAN A, RUSSELL J A. An approach to environmental psychology[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1974: 24-30.
[14] 张海, 刘蕾. 高校科研人员科研数据开放意愿的影响因素研究 [J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2020(11): 57-64.
[15] 彭丽徽, 蒋欣. 虚拟社区感知视角下用户知识创新行为影响因素研究[J]. 现代情报, 2023, 43(2): 86-95.
[16] KIM Y, STANTON J M. Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists’data-sharing behaviors: a multilevel analysis[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(4): 776-799.
[17] HARPER L M, KIM Y. Attitudinal, normative, and resource factors affecting psychologists’ intentions to adopt an open data badge: an empirical analysis[J]. International journal of information management, 2018, 41(8): 23-32.
[18] OKOLI C, OH W. Investigating recognition-based performance in an open content community: a social capital perspective[J]. Information & management, 2007, 44(3): 240-252.
[19] 李静, 高晓彩. 社会网络视角下人际信任对心理健康的影响[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2020(4): 68-73.
[20] 盛小平, 孙倩倩. 国内科学数据开放共享主题的作者合作关系与合作研究内容分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(23): 13-21.
[21] 支凤稳, 云仲伦, 张闪闪. 基于区块链的个人科学数据共享模式研究[J]. 现代情报, 2021, 41(12): 69-78.
[22] 支凤稳, 赵梦凡, 张萌, 等. 科学数据共享需求调查与关联挖掘 [J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(12): 9-16.
[23] 刘桂锋, 濮静蓉, 钱锦琳. 科研数据共享影响因素分析及作用阐释[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018(11): 10-17, 26.
[24] 邓灵斌, 肖洪伟. 我国高校科研人员科学数据共享意愿之实证研究[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2021(5): 17-22.
[25] ROWHANI-FARID A, ALLEN M, BARNETT A G. What incentives increase data sharing in health and medical research?a systematic review[J]. Research integrity and peer review, 2017, 2(12): 4-10.
[26] ANDREWS K M, DELAHAY B L. Influences on knowledge processes in organization: the psychosocial filer[J]. Journal of management studies, 2000, 37(6): 797-810.
[27] 郑万松, 孙晓琳, 王刊良. 基于社会资本和计划行为理论的知识共享影响因素研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报( 社会科版), 2014, 34(1): 43-48.
[28] 明均仁, 郭财强. 移动图书馆用户使用行为意愿的动态实证研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2018(10): 73-79.
[29] CHIU C M, HSU M H, WANG E. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories[J]. Decision support systems, 2007, 42(3): 1872-1888.
[30] WIXOM B H, TODD P A.A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance[J]. Information systems research, 2005, 16(1): 85-102.
[31] MCKINNEY V, YOON K, ZAHEDI F M. The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: an expection and disconfirmation approach[J]. Information systems research, 2002, 13(3): 296-315.
[32] 余玲. 科研人员科学数据共享意愿的影响因素研究[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2016.
[33] CHANG H H, CHUANG S S. Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: participant involvement as a moderator[J]. Information & management, 2011, 48(1): 9-18.
[34] 吴丹, 陈晶. 我国医学从业者科学数据共享行为调查研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(18): 30-39.
[35] 王春晓, 陈姝彤, 徐坤. 研究生科学数据共享态度与共享意愿关系研究[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(12): 78-84.
[36] 郭宇. 基于信息生态视角的新媒体环境下企业知识共享研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2016.
[37] 阮冰颖, 刘桂锋, 刘琼. 科研人员视角下科学数据安全影响因素仿真分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(2): 137-145.
[38] 张宝生, 张庆普. 隐性知识流转网成员合作的共生关系、演化模型及仿真研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(11): 34-43, 53.
[39] 马玲. 高校科研人员科学数据共享机制研究[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(9): 80-83.
[40] KIM Y. Reputation, trust, and norms as mechanisms leading to academic reciprocity in data sharing: an empirical test of theory of collective action[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 55(1): 244-253.
[41] 邢文明, 杨泽芳. 基于声誉理论的开放科学数据质量提升激励机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(21): 22-28.
[42] KIM Y, ADLER M. Social scientists’ data sharing behaviors: investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories[J]. International journal of information management, 2015, 35(4): 408-418.
[43] AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
[44] 杨宁, 张志强. 科学数据集知识扩散特征探析—— 以基因表达数据集为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(12): 82-91.
文章导航

/

〈 〉