图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2025 , Vol. 69 >Issue 15: 103 - 111

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.15.009

研究论文

GLAM机构参与数字记忆项目开发：兴起背景、实践意蕴与实现路径

  • 张旭 ,
  • 张斌
展开
  • 1 中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872;
    2 中国人民大学图书馆 北京 100872;
    3 中国人民大学数字人文研究院 北京 100872
张旭，博士研究生；张斌，馆长，教授，博士，博士生导师，通信作者，E-mail：zhangbin@ruc.edu.cn。

收稿日期: 2024-09-04

  修回日期: 2025-02-07

  网络出版日期: 2025-07-21

基金资助

本文系中国人民大学科学研究基金重大项目“中国自主的档案学知识体系建构”（项目编号：24XNN012）和中国人民大学2024年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划研究成果之一。

收起

Participation of GLAM Institutions in the Development of Digital Memory Projects: Background, Significance and Implementation

  • Zhang Xu ,
  • Zhang Bin
Expand
  • 1 School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    2 Renmin University of China Libraries, Beijing 100872;
    3 Research Center for Digital Humanities of Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
Zhang Xu, doctoral candidate; Zhang Bin, director, professor, PhD, doctoral supervisor, corresponding author, E-mail: zhangbin@ruc.edu.cn.

Received date: 2024-09-04

  Revised date: 2025-02-07

  Online published: 2025-07-21

Supported by

This work is supported by the major project of Science Research Fund of Renmin University of China, titled “Construction of Autonomous Archival Science Knowledge System in China” (Grant No. 24XNN012) and the Outstanding Innovative Talents Cultivation Funded Programs 2024 of Renmin University of China.

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 明晰GLAM机构参与数字记忆项目开发的背景、价值与路径，是数智时代数字记忆项目保持良性发展态势的必然要求。[方法/过程] 通过文献与网络调研，以国内外数字记忆项目为案例支撑，梳理GLAM机构参与数字记忆项目开发的兴起背景，从实践价值层面探明GLAM机构参与数字记忆项目开发的意蕴内涵，提出GLAM机构深度参与数字记忆项目开发全流程的实现路径。[结果/结论] GLAM机构参与数字记忆项目开发是数智时代的必然产物，在数字人文理论体系建构、开放共享服务平台建设、跨界协作融合互动增强、全民公众参与机制完善、记忆场域文化底蕴挖掘、数字叙事交互表达强化等层面具有一定的现实价值。为此，坚持以人本为核心、以开源为要义、以协作为手段、以服务为目标的开发路径，是GLAM机构保障数字记忆项目长期可持续性发展的实现路径。

关键词： 数字记忆项目; 数字记忆; 数字人文项目; 数字人文; GLAM机构

本文引用格式

张旭 , 张斌 . GLAM机构参与数字记忆项目开发：兴起背景、实践意蕴与实现路径[J]. 图书情报工作, 2025 , 69(15) : 103 -111 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.15.009

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Clarifying the background, value, and path for GLAM institutions to participate in the development of digital memory projects is an inevitable requirement for digital memory projects to maintain a sustainable development in the digital intelligence era. [Method/Process] Through literature and online research, and supported by case studies of domestic and international digital memory projects, the background of GLAM institutions’ participation in digital memory projects development was sorted out. The implication of GLAM institutions’ participation in the projects was explored from the perspective of practical value. And the path of the in-depth participation of GLAM institutions in the whole process of developing digital memory projects was put forward. [Result/Conclusion] The participation of GLAM institutions in digital memory projects is an inevitable product in digital intelligence era. It has certain practical value in various aspects, including the construction of digital humanities theoretical system, the establishment of open and shared service platforms, the enhancement of cross-border collaboration and integration, the improvement of public participation mechanisms, the excavation of cultural heritage in the memory field, and the enhancement of digital narrative interactive expression. For this reason, the development path that adheres to human as the core, open source as the essence, collaboration as the means, and service as the goal, is the implementation for the GLAM institutions to guarantee the long-term sustainability of the digital memory projects.

Key words： digital memory project; digital memory; digital humanities project; digital humanities; GLAM institutions

参考文献

[1] 冯惠玲. 数字时代的记忆风景[N]. 中国档案报, 2015-11-19(3). (FENG H L. The memory landscape of the digital age[N]. China archives news, 2015-11-19(3).)
[2] IFLA Library. Acquiring, organising and providing access to digital content: The Singapore Memory Project experience[EB/OL]. [2025-04-16]. https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/214/.
[3] PIN W W. Memory and the nation: on the Singapore memory project[J]. Alexandria, 2014, 25(3): 63-70.
[4] KUPFER S. A rising tide of digitization: the Ohio memory project[J]. Computers in libraries, 2010, 30(9): 6.
[5] TULL L. Cooperative digital imaging projects: the Greater Cincinnati memory project[J]. The electronic library, 2002, 20(1): 43-48.
[6] 韩尉. 中国记忆项目文献资源推广的探索与实践[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2015, 24(1): 28-31. (HAN W. The exploration of practice on popularization of literature resources by China memory project[J]. Journal of the national library of China, 2015, 24(1): 28-31.)
[7] 田苗, 汤更生. 中国记忆项目的构想与实践[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2015, 24(1): 3-9. (TIAN M, TANG G S. Conception and practice of China memory project[J]. Journal of the national library of China, 2015, 24(1): 3-9.)
[8] 赵鑫, 赵盼超. 集体记忆视阈下图书馆影音记忆文献建设研究——以中国国家图书馆“中国记忆”项目为例[J]. 图书馆建设, 2018(6): 39-43. (ZHAO X, ZHAO P C. Construction of audio-visual memory library in the perspective of collective memory: a case study of China memory project of the national library of China[J]. Library development, 2018(6): 39-43.)
[9] 刘东亮. 图书馆口述史、影像史资源整理利用与公共服务研究——以国家图书馆中国记忆项目为例[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2021(1): 117-121. (LIU D L. Research on the arrangement and utilization of library oral history and image history resources and related public services: taking the China memory project in national library of China as an example[J]. Library theory and practice, 2021(1): 117-121.)
[10] FENG H L, JIA X S, NIU L, et al. Building digital memory for historic urban heritage: the Beijing memory project experience[C]//20183rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) held jointly with 201824th international conference on virtual systems & sultimedia (VSMM 2018). San Francisco: IEEE, 2018: 1-4.
[11] 牛力, 王烨楠. 基于档案的城市记忆资源建设全过程模型及应用研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2017(1): 24-30. (NIU L, WANG Y N. Research on the whole process model and application of the city memory resources construction based on archives[J]. Archives science study, 2017(1): 24-30.)
[12] CUI J X, LI H W, WEI L. Shanghai memory as a digital humanities platform to rebuild the history of the city[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2021, 36(4): 841-857.
[13] 冯惠玲, 梁继红, 马林青. 台州古村落数字记忆平台建设研究——以高迁古村为例[J]. 中国档案, 2019(5): 74-75. (FENG H L, LIANG J H, MA L Q. Research on the construction of digital memory platform for ancient villages in Taizhou: a case study of Gaoqian ancient village[J]. China archives, 2019(5): 74-75.)
[14] LIU L, ZHENG S, NIU L, et al. Digital preservation and presentation of institution photo archives: the Anhui University memory project experience[J]. Digital presentation and preservation of cultural and scientific heritage, 2019, 9: 323-330.
[15] 刘芳兵, 夏翠娟, 杨新涯. 高校数字记忆项目建设策略研究——以重庆大学数字记忆项目方案设计为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(18): 31-39. (LIU F B, XIA C J, YANG X Y. Research on the construction strategy of digital memory project in colleges and universities: taking the scheme design of Chongqing University digital memory project as an example[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(18): 31-39.)
[16] 张旭, 张斌. 数字记忆项目开发：现状、问题与对策[J]. 图书与情报, 2023(4): 41-49. (ZHANG X, ZHANG B. Digital memory project development: status, problems and countermeasures[J]. Library & information, 2023(4): 41-49.)
[17] 张旭, 李星玥. 基于熊彼特创新理论的数字人文服务策略研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2023(6): 85-94. (ZHANG X, LI X Y. Research on digital humanities service strategy based on Schumpeter’s innovation theory[J]. Library theory and practice, 2023(6): 85-94.)
[18] 安妮·伯迪克, 约翰娜·德鲁克, 彼得·伦恩费尔德, 等. 数字人文[M]. 马林青, 韩若画, 译.北京：中国人民大学出版社, 2018. (BURDICK A, DRUCKER J, LUNENFELD P, et al. Digital Humanities[M]. MA L Q, HAN R H, trans. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2018.)
[19] ADHO. centerNet[EB/OL]. [2025-04-16]. https://centernet.adho.org/centers.
[20] 丁华东, 周子晴. 数字人文：数字时代社会记忆再生产的新景观[J]. 情报科学, 2023, 41(11): 1-7, 27. (DING H D, ZHOU Z Q. Digital humanities: a new landscape of social memory reproduction in the digital age[J]. Information science, 2023, 41(11): 1-7, 27.)
[21] Digital Humanities Awards. Highlighting resources in digital humanities[EB/OL]. [2024-08-18]. http://dhawards.org/.
[22] SULA C A, HILL H V. The early history of digital humanities: an analysis of computers and the humanities (1966–2004) and literary and linguistic computing (1986–2004)[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2019, 34(S1): i190-i206.
[23] 张旭. 数字记忆项目开发策略研究[D]. 北京: 中国人民大学, 2023. (ZHANG X. Research on development strategy of digital memory project[D]. Beijing: Renmin University of China, 2023.)
[24] 曲春梅, 何紫璇.概念、意义与实践：档案与数字人文的双向考察[J]. 档案学研究, 2022(6): 10-17. (QU C M, HE Z X. Conception, significance and practice: a bidirectional examination of archives and digital humanities[J]. Archives science study, 2022(6): 10-17.)
[25] THEIMER K. Archives in context and as context[J]. Journal of digital humanities, 2012, 1(2): 1-2.
[26] 王丽华, 刘炜. 数字人文理论建构与学科建设——读《数字人文:数字时代的知识与批判》[J]. 数字人文研究, 2021, 1(1): 5-15. (WANG L H, LIU W. The construction of digital humanities theory and the discipline: a review of Digital Humanities: Knowledge and Critique in a Digital Age[J]. Digital humanities research, 2021, 1(1): 5-15.)
[27] 周耀林, 刘晗. 数字记忆建构: 缘起、理论与方法[J]. 山东社会科学, 2020(8): 50-59. (ZHOU Y L, LIU H. The construction of digital memory: origin, theory, and method[J]. Shandong social sciences, 2020(8): 50-59.)
[28] 张旭, 王晓宇. 数字人文学科归属及其与图情档关系初探[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(2): 29-34. (ZHANG X, WANG X Y. On the attribution of digital humanities and its relationship with library, information and archives management[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2022, 45(2): 29-34.)
[29] 冯惠玲, 任瑾, 陈怡.北京“双奥”遗产的数字化保存与传播[J]. 图书情报知识, 2022, 39(3): 22-31. (FENG H L, REN J, CHEN Y. Digital preservation and dissemination of Beijing dual olympic legacy[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2022, 39(3): 22-31.)
[30] 张勇丽, 丁梦瑶. 乡村文化延革的新思路：农家书屋文化服务场景建构[J]. 文艺争鸣, 2022, 334(5): 200-204. (ZHANG Y L, DING M Y. New ideas for the extension of rural culture: construction of cultural service scenes in rural libraries[J]. Literary and artistic contention, 2022, 334(5): 200-204.)
[31] 张志庆, 张正午. 数字人文研究中的方法论误区及研究规范[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2021, 43(10): 17-20. (ZHANG Z Q, ZHANG Z W. Methodological misconceptions and research norms in digital humanities research[J]. Modern communication (Journal of communication university of China), 2021, 43(10): 17-20.)
[32] 曾粤亮, 钟雷方. 数字记忆的开放式构建：公众参与平台资源建设的途径研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(4): 34-43. (ZENG Y L, ZHONG L F. Open construction of digital memory: study on the ways of public participation in platform resources development[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(4): 34-43.)
[33] NORA P. Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire[J]. Representations, 1989, 26: 7-24.
[34] 王玉珏, 许佳欣.皮埃尔·诺拉“记忆之场”理论及其档案学思想[J]. 档案学研究, 2021(3): 10-17. (WANG Y J, XU J X. Pierre Nora’s “les lieux de mémoires” theory and his archival thoughts[J]. Archives science study, 2021(3): 10-17.)
[35] 付雅明, 张永娟, 刘炜, 等.数字叙事作为数字人文方法：现状与可能[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(14): 10-19. (FU Y M, ZHANG Y J, LIU W, et al. Digital storytelling as a digital humanities method: the status quo and the potential[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(14): 10-19.)
[36] Open GLAM. What’s new in the Open GLAM survey[EB/OL]. [2025-04-16]. https://medium.com/open-glam/whats-new-in-the-open-glam-survey-b5d65498cc77.
[37] 中国政府网. 文化和旅游部国家发展改革委财政部关于推动公共文化服务高质量发展的意见[EB/OL]. [2025-04-16]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-03/23/content_5595153.htm. (THE STATE COUNCIL OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. Opinions of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, the National Development and Reform Commission, and the Ministry of Finance on Promoting High Quality Development of Public Cultural Services[EB/OL]. [2025-04-16]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-03/23/content_5595153.htm.)
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉