研究论文

图书情报学方法论范式演进及其学术影响力研究——基于图书情报学18种CSSCI来源期刊的实证分析

  • 龚蛟腾 ,
  • 张康 ,
  • 王凤姣
展开
  • 1 湘潭大学公共管理学院 湘潭 411105;
    2 湘潭大学图书馆 湘潭 411105
龚蛟腾,教授,博士;张康,博士研究生,通信作者,E-mail:2587042905@qq.com;王凤姣,教授,博士。

收稿日期: 2025-03-11

  修回日期: 2025-06-03

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-11

基金资助

本文系湖南省社会科学基金重大项目“教育数字化驱动的未来学习中心建设研究”(项目编号:23ZDAJ007)研究成果之一。

Research on the Evolution of Methodology Paradigm in Library and Information Science and its Academic Influence: Empirical Analysis Based on 18 CSSCI Journals

  • Gong Jiaoteng ,
  • Zhang Kang ,
  • Wang Fengjiao
Expand
  • 1 School of Public Administration, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105;
    2 Xiangtan University Library, Xiangtan 411105
Gong Jiaoteng, Professor, PhD; Zhang Kang, Doctoral Candidate, Corresponding Author, E-mail: 2587042905@qq.com; Wang Fengjiao, Professor, PhD.

Received date: 2025-03-11

  Revised date: 2025-06-03

  Online published: 2025-11-11

Supported by

This work is supported by the Hunan Social Science Fund Project titled “Research on the Construction of Future Learning Center Driven by Digital Education”(Grant No. 23ZDAJ007).

摘要

[目的/意义] 研究范式变革表征学科演进轨迹,揭示图书情报学方法论范式转型,评估其对图情期刊学术影响力的效应,有利于推动学科知识创新。[方法/过程] 采用内容分析法探究2000—2024年图书情报学18种CSSCI来源期刊学术论文的研究方法及其方法论范式的构成概貌、演进特征和发展趋向,并以综合影响因子面板数据为核心建立的断点回归模型,估计方法论范式转变映射在图书情报学期刊学术影响力的效应。[结果/结论] 图书情报学的研究方法及其方法论范式具有多元共生特性,且学术影响力效应差异较大。当前,图书情报学研究范式已从逻辑思辨范式主导转向实证主义范式引领、解释主义范式跟跑、技术驱动范式追赶的多元发展阶段,未来还将朝着“数据生态演化”为标志的方法论范式演进,这在一定程度上能提升图书情报学期刊的学术影响力。随着知识创新方式从预设研究转向以数据为基础的涌现解析、研究方法运用走向定性与定量的统合发展、研究旨趣从问题导向走向事件导向,图书情报学应当在走向数据与AI的范式变革中坚守科学性和规范性,增强信息获取与处理的现实解释力,缔构学科知识体系的新图景。

本文引用格式

龚蛟腾 , 张康 , 王凤姣 . 图书情报学方法论范式演进及其学术影响力研究——基于图书情报学18种CSSCI来源期刊的实证分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2025 , 69(21) : 52 -69 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.21.005

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The transformation of research paradigm in library and information science(LIS) characterizes the evolution of disciplines, reveals the shifts in methodology paradigm, and evaluates its academic influence of LIS journals. The research is conducive to promoting the innovation of LIS knowledge. [Method/Process] This paper used the content analysis to investigate the research methods and methodological paradigms in academic articles of LIS in 18 CSSCI source journals from 2000 to 2024. It examined their composition, evolution characteristics, and development trend. Then, the breakpoint regression benchmark model was established, using the comprehensive impact factor panel data as the core, to estimate the effect of the methodological paradigm shift on the academic influence of LIS journals. [Result/Conclusion] LIS research methods and methodological paradigms exhibit pluralistic and symbiotic characteristics, with significant variations in their academic influence. At present, the LIS research paradigm has shifted from the logical-speculative paradigm to the pluralistic development stage of positivism paradigm, interpretivism paradigm and technology-driven paradigm. In the future, it will also evolve towards a new methodological paradigm marked by the “evolution of the data ecosystem, “ which will enhance the academic influence of LIS journals. The knowledge production mode of LIS research has shifted from presupposition research to data-based emergence analysis, the application of research methods to the integrated development of qualitative and quantitative, and the research purport from problem-oriented to event-oriented transdisciplinary research. Library and information science should adhere to the unremitting pursuit of scientificity and standardization in the paradigm and method reform towards the wave of data and AI, constantly enhance the realistic explanatory power of human information acquisition and query, and systematically construct a new picture of innovative development of subject knowledge.

参考文献

[1] 于良芝,樊振佳.图书馆信息学的逻辑架构及历史轨迹:基于推理与史实的学科独特性思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2020, 46(4):4-19.(YU L Z, FAN Z J. The logical structure and historical path of library and information science:reflection based on deduction and reasoning[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2020, 46(4):4-19.)
[2] VAKKARI P. Library and information science:content and scope[M]//OLAISEN J L, MUCH P, WILSON P. Information science:from the development of the discipline to social interaction. Oslo:Scandinavian University Press, 1996:169-232.
[3] 叶鹰.图书情报学的学术思想与技术方法及其开新[J].中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(2):15-25.(YE Y. An essay on the academic thoughts and technical methods with their renewing in library and information science[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2019, 45(2):15-25.)
[4] 卢正明."图书馆学实证研究:规范拓展超越"博士生学术会议综述[J].大学图书馆学报, 2012, 30(5):89.(LU Z M.'Empirical study of library science:normative development beyond'summary of doctoral academic conference[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2012, 30(5):89.)
[5] 马海群,廉龙颖.信息资源管理领域ChatGPT的研究图景--一项系统性文献综述[J].图书情报工作, 2024,68(19):114-127.(MA H Q, LIAN L Y. Research landscape of ChatGPT in the field of information resources management:a systematic literature review[J]. Library and information service,2024, 68(19):114-127.)
[6] 库恩.科学革命的结构[M]. 4版.金吾伦,胡新和,译.北京:北京大学出版社, 2012:7-11.(KUHN T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. 4th ed. JIN W L, HU X H, trans.Beijing:Peking University Press, 2012:7-11.)
[7] 李国杰.智能化科研(AI4R):第五科研范式[J].中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(1):1-9.(LI G J. AI4R:the fifth scientific research paradigm[J]. Bulletin of Chinese academy of sciences, 2024,39(1):1-9.)
[8] 孙蒙鸽,韩涛,王燕鹏,等. GPT技术变革对基础科学研究的影响分析[J].中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(8):1212-1224.(SUN M G, HAN T, WANG Y P, et al. Impact analysis of GPT technology revolution on fundamental scientific research[J].Bulletin of Chinese academy of sciences, 2023, 38(8):1212-1224.)
[9] 巴志超,李纲,周利琴,等.数据科学及其对情报学变革的影响[J].情报学报, 2018, 37(7):653-667.(BA Z C, LI G, ZHOU L Q, et al. Data science and its implications on the transformation of information science[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018, 37(7):653-667.)
[10] 尹鸿博.库恩范式学说与图书馆学发展状态探究[J].图书馆杂志, 2012, 31(7):2-6.(YIN H B. Kuhn paradigm doctrine and library science development[J]. Library journal, 2012, 31(7):2-6.)
[11] 白卉,蒋永福.图书馆学范式初论[J].图书情报工作, 2009,53(1):34-37, 88.(BAI H, JIANG Y F. An initial analysis of library science paradigm.[J]. Library and information service,2009, 53(1):34-37, 88.)
[12] 刘亚玲.图书馆学研究范式的当代转换[J].图书馆, 2015(11):41-44.(LIU Y L. The contemporary transformation of library science research paradigm[J]. Library, 2015(11):41-44.)
[13] 傅荣贤.对图书馆学研究中两个基本范式的反思[J].中国图书馆学报, 2009, 35(1):42-46, 85.(FU R X. Reflections on two basic paradigms in library science[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2009, 35(1):42-46, 85.
[14] 张洋,朱嘉麒,王媛媛,等.图情学科研究的范式思考--以科学评价为例[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(12):20-26.(ZHANG Y, ZHU J Q, WANG Y Y, et al. Reflections on the research paradigm in library&information science:a case study of scientific evaluation[J]. Library and information service, 2021,65(12):20-26.)
[15] 李品,杨国立.中国情报学的研究范式:现状与展望[J].情报学报, 2023, 42(8):980-995.(LI P, YANG L G. Research paradigm of Chinese information science:current situation and prospects[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2023, 42(8):980-995.)
[16] 柯平,赵益民,高爽.改革开放30年图书馆学基础理论研究回顾与思考[J].中国图书馆学报, 2008(5):72-78.(KE P,ZHAO Y M, GAO S. Review and reflection of basic theoretical researches in library science in the past 30 years[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2008(5):72-78.)
[17] 石婷婷,路锦怡.近十年实证研究方法在图书馆学的应用分析[J].图书馆, 2022(5):106-112.(SHI T T, LU J Y. Analysis of the application of empirical research methods in library science in recent ten years[J]. Library, 2022(5):106-112.)
[18] 叶鹰.新世纪以来国内图书馆学研究流向简评[J].图书馆杂志, 2017, 36(7):4-9.(YE Y.A brief review on the research trend of library science in China since 2000[J]. Library journal, 2017,36(7):4-9.)
[19] 刘丽敏,柯平,王晴.图书馆情报学实验研究范式及其应用实践[J].图书馆, 2017(7):1-5.(LIU L M, KE P, WANG Q. On paradigm and practices of experimental research in library and information science[J]. Library, 2017(7):1-5.)
[20] 邓仲华,李志芳.科学研究范式的演化--大数据时代的科学研究第四范式[J].情报资料工作, 2013(4):19-23.(DENG Z H, LI Z F. The evolution of scientific research paradigm:the fourth paradigm of scientific research in the era of big data[J].Information and documentation services, 2013(4):19-23.)
[21] 罗威.构建数据密集型科技情报范式[J].信息资源管理学报,2021, 11(2):12-15.(LUO W. Building a data-intensive paradigm in scientific intelligence[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2021, 11(2):12-15.)
[22] 金家琴,刘炜. AI 2.0时代的数字学术及其范式变革[J].图书馆杂志, 2023, 42(11):10-21.(JIN J Q, LIU W. The transformation of digital scholarship paradigm in AI 2.0 era[J].Library journal, 2023, 42(11):10-21.)
[23] 王琳.情报学研究范式与主流理论的演化历程(1987-2017)[J].情报学报, 2018, 37(9):956-970.(WANG L. Paradigm shift and theory evolution of information science (1987-2017)[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information,2018, 37(9):956-970.)
[24] 周晓英,陈燕方.中国情报学研究范式的冲突与思考[J].公安学研究, 2019, 2(2):27-44, 123.(ZHOU X Y, CHEN Y F.Conflict in the research paradigm of information science and some reflections[J]. Journal of public security science, 2019,2(2):27-44, 123.)
[25] 田方斌. 80年代以来中国图书馆学方法论研究之进展[J].中国图书馆学报, 1998(1):53-60, 94.(TIAN F B. Developments of Methodological Studies in Library Science in 1980s[J].Journal of library science in China, 1998(1):53-60, 94.)
[26] AHSAN U, KANWAL A. Mixed methods research in library and information science:a methodological review[J]. Library&information science research, 2018(4):53-60.
[27] PERITZ B. The methods of library science research:Some results from a bibliometric survey[J]. Library research, 1980(2):251-68.
[28] 刘迅.要重视图书馆学方法论的研究[J].图书馆学通讯,1981(2):3-5.(LIU X. Attaching importance to research of methodology of library science[J]. Library science bulletin,1981(2):3-5.)
[29] 徐跃权,杨玉麟.论我国图书馆学方法论中的专门研究方法[J].中国图书馆学报, 2010, 36(1):20-26.(XU Y Q, YANG Y L.On specialized research methods in library science methodology in China[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2010, 36(1):20-26.)
[30] 王崇德.图书情报学方法论[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社, 1988:239-242.(WANG C D. Methodology of library and information science[M]. Beijing:Science and Technology Literature Press, 1988:239-242.)
[31] 乔好勤.试论图书馆学研究中的方法论问题[J].图书馆学通讯, 1983(1):54-62, 94.(QIAO H Q. Discussion on the methodological problems in the research of library science[J].Library science bulletin, 1983(1):54-62, 94.)
[32] 霍国庆.图书馆学方法论体系试探[J].图书情报知识,1988(3):37.(HUO G Q. An analysis on the methodology system of library science[J]. Document, information&knowledge,1988(3):37.)
[33] 张寒生.当代图书情报学方法论研究[M].合肥:合肥工业大学出版社, 2006:12.(ZHANG H S. Research on methodology of contemporary library and information science[M]. Hefei:Hefei University of Technology Press, 2006:12.)
[34] 焦运立.图书馆学研究方法体系和方法论体系的辨析--兼谈21世纪这两个体系的构建与整合[J].图书馆学研究, 2010(7):2-6, 36.(JIAO Y L. An analysis of the research method system and methodology system of library science:the construction and integration of two systems in the 21st century[J]. Research on library science, 2010(7):2-6, 36.)
[35] 李广建.建立具有中国特色的图书馆学方法论体系[J].图书情报知识, 1986(2):4-7.(LI G J. To establish a methodology system of library science with Chinese characteristics[J].Documentation, information&knowledge, 1986(2):4-7.)
[36] 贾二鹏,易靖涵,司苗苗.图书馆学学术论文研究方法统计分析[J].图书与情报, 2010(1):111-114.(JIA E P, YI J H, SI M M.A statistical analysis of the library science papers research methods[J]. Library and information, 2010(1):111-114.)
[37] 杨溢.基于知识资源论的图书馆学方法论体系研究[J].图书馆,2008(3):1-4, 8.(YANG Y. The study on the library methodology system based on knowledge resource theory[J]. Library, 2008(3):1-4, 8.)
[38] 陈传夫,马浩琴.图书情报学现实研究中科学方法应用的调查分析--以2010年的期刊论文为样本[J].图书馆论坛,2011, 31(6):32-37, 67.(CHEN C F, MA H Q. Survey research on implementation of research methods in library and information science:take the journal articles of 2010 as sample[J]. Library tribune, 2011, 31(6):32-37, 67.)
[39] JÄRVELIN K, VAKKARI P. Content analysis of research articles in library and information science[J]. Library&information science research, 1990, 12(4):395-421.
[40] KUMPULAINEN S. Library and information science research in 1975:content analysis of the journal articles[J]. Libri, 1991,41(1):59-76.
[41] 储荷婷.图书馆情报学界的研究方法:实践与发展[J].国家图书馆学刊, 2014, 23(3):3-14.(CHU H T. Research methods in library and information science:practice and development[J].Journal of the National Library of China, 2014, 23(3):3-14.)
[42] 吴丹,樊舒,李秀园.中国情境下图书馆学研究方法的识别、分类及应用[J].中国图书馆学报, 2021, 47(5):33-47.(WU D,FAN S, LI X Y. The identification, classification and application of library science research methods in Chinese context.[J].Journal of library science in China, 2021, 47(5):33-47.)
[43] ZHANG C Z, TIAN L, CHU H T. Usage frequency and application variety of research methods in library and information science:continuous investigation from 1991 to 2021[J].Information processing&management, 2023, 60(6):103507.
[44] ZHANG C Z, TIAN L. Non-synchronism in global usage of research methods in library and information science from 1990 to2019[J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128(7):3981-4006.
[45] 刘思琦,贾君枝,黄诗晴,等.数据密集型范式下图书情报学研究方法的构成、演进与哲学认识[J].情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(12):97-105.(LIU S Q, JIA J Z, HUANG S Q,et al. Composition, evolution and philosophical understanding of research methods in library and information science under the data-intensive paradigm[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2024, 47(12):97-105.)
[46] MASUKU M. Library and information science and the positivist paradigm:some critical reflections[J]. Journal of librarianship and information science, 2024, 56(3):698-711.)
[47] 李超平.图书馆学研究:方法的互补[J].图书情报工作, 2001,45(2):13-16.(LI C P. Library science research:complementarity of methods[J]. Library and information service, 2001, 45(2):13-16.)
[48] 耿志杰,曹涧川,林珊,等.论研究方法与中国图书馆学研究范式的转变[J].图书馆论坛, 2021, 41(10):28-37.(GENG Z J,CAO J C, LIN S, et al. Research methods and paradigm shift in Chinese library science[J]. Library tribune, 2021, 41(10):28-37.)
[49] 刘宇,叶继元,袁曦临.实证缺失的中国图书馆学研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2009, 35(4):20-24, 30.(LIU Y, YE J Y, YUAN X L. Lack of Empirical research in Chinese library science.[J].Journal of Library Science in China, 2009, 35(4):20-24, 30.)
[50] 张力,唐健辉,刘永涛,等.中外图书情报学研究方法量化比较[J].中国图书馆学报, 2012(2):23-29.(ZHANG L,TANG J H, LIU Y T, et al. An informetric comparison on LIS methodology between Chinese and foreign articles[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2012, 38(2):23-29.)
[51] GRAR J. Jim Gray on eScience:a transformed scientific method[C]//HEY T, TANSLEY S, TOLLE K. The fourth paradigm:data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond:Microsoft Research, 2009:17-31.
[52] PENG T Q, ZHU J J H. Where you publish matters most:a multilevel analysis of factors affecting citations of Internet studies[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(9):1789-1803.
[53] 刘宇,伍丹炜,叶继元.文本可读性与学术论文的影响力:基于图书情报学的实证研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(5):111-127.(LIU Y, WU D W, YE J Y. Text readability and the impact of academic articles:an empirical study based on library and information science.[J]. Journal of library science in China,2023, 49(5):111-127.)
[54] JABBOUR C J C, JABBOUR A B L S, DE OLIVEIRA J H C.The perception of Brazilian researchers concerning the factors that influence the citation of their articles:a study in the field of sustainability[J]. Serials review, 2013, 39(2):93-96.
[55] FILION K B, PLESS I B. Factors related to the frequency of citation of epidemiologic publications[J]. Epidemiologic perspectives&innovations, 2008, 5(1):1-7.
[56] CHEN S, QIU J, ARSENAULT C, et al. Exploring the interdisciplinarity patterns of highly cited papers[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15(1):101-124.
[57] VANCLAY J K.Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2013, 7(2):265-271.
[58] PERITZ B C. Are methodological papers more cited than theoretical or empirical ones?the case of sociology[J].Scientometrics, 1983, 5(4):211-218.
[59] 谢娟,成颖,李江,等.文化资本与论文影响力的关系[J].情报学报,2019, 38(9):943-953.(XIE J, CHENG Y, LI J, et al.The relationship between cultural capital and the academic impact of journal articles[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(9):943-953.)
[60] BORNMANN L, SCHIER H, MARX W, et al. What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2012, 6(1):11-18.
[61] JAMALI H, NIKZAD M. Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2011,88(2):653-661.
[62] 魏瑞斌.论文标题特征与被引的关联性研究[J].情报学报,2017, 36(11):1148-1156.(WEI R B. Study on the relationship between the title characteristics and citation[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2017,36(11):1148-1156.)
[63] VAN WESEL M, WYATT S, HAAF T J. What a difference a colon makes:how superficial factors influence subsequent citation[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(3):1601-1615.
[64] ANTONIOU G A, ANTONIOU S A, GEORGAKARAKOS E I, et al. Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature[J]. Annals of vascular surgery, 2015, 29(2):286-292.
[65] LISKIEWICZ T, LISKIEWICZ G, PACZESNY J. Factors affecting the citations of papers in tribology journals[J].Scientometrics, 2021, 126(4):3321-3336.
[66] 马荣康,李真真.高被引还是零被引:基于论文被引的最佳科研合作规模研究--来自Financial Times TOP 45商学院期刊的证据[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(11):1182-1190.(MA R K, LI Z Z. High citation or zero citation:exploring the optimal scale of research cooperation based on the citation of scientific publication-evidence from the financial times TOP45 journals[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020, 39(11):1182-1190.)
[67] CHU H T. Research methods in library and information science:a content analysis[J]. Library&information science research,2015, 37(1):36-41.
[68] HOLSTI O R. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities[M]. Boston:Addison-wesley, 1969:12-13.
[69] 陆溯,谢珍.近10年图书馆学核心期刊高被引论文研究方法应用分析[J].大学图书馆学报, 2020, 38(3):40-47.(LU S,XIE Z. Analysis of research methods for highly cited papers in core journals of library science in recent ten years[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2020, 38(3):40-47.)
[70] 李林华.图书馆学研究方法:困境及其出路[J].图书情报工作, 2008(8):66-68, 76.(LI L H. The research method of library science:its difficulties and outlet[J]. Library and information service, 2008(8):66-68, 76.)
[71] 丁晓蔚,李树青,胡桓.先进信息技术驱动的情报学研究内容和方法变化及思考[J].图书与情报, 2021(5):123-127.(DING X W, LI S Q, HU H. Changes and reflections on the research contents and methods of intelligence studies driven by advanced information technology[J]. Library&information, 2021(5):123-127.)
[72] 刘生龙.社会科学研究中的断点回归设计:最新代表性研究及其展望[J].公共管理评论, 2021, 3(2):140-159.(LIU S L. Regression discontinuity design in social science research:analysis of the latest representative research and prospects for development[J]. China public administration review, 2021, 3(2):140-159.)
[73] 步一.从"是什么"到"为什么":信息资源管理学科的因果推断探索[J].情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(12):106-113.(BU Y. From "What" to "Why" :explorations of causal inference in information resource management[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2024, 47(12):106-113.)
[74] 胡咏梅,潘慧凡.研究范式转型能促进我国教育类期刊学术影响力提升吗--基于2010-2020年6种教育类CSSCI来源期刊文章研究方法的计量分析[J].教育学报, 2024,20(4):153-171.(HU Y M, PAN H F. Can the transformation of research paradigm promote the influence of Chinese educational journals?an econometric analysis based on the research methods of 6 CSSCI journals in education from 2010 to 2020.[J]. Journal of educational studies, 2024, 20(4):153-171.)
[75] 李一杉,刘金松.教育实证研究改善了学术论文的质量和影响力吗--以中国大陆教育学术研究领域为例[J].教育发展研究, 2021, 41(9):63-77.(LI Y S, LIU J S. Does educational empirical research improve the quality and impact of academic papers:take the educational research field in China's mainland as an example[J]. Research in educational development, 2021,41(9):63-77.)
[76] LEE D S. Randomized experiments from non-randomselectionin US House elections[J]. Journal of econometrics, 2008, 142(2):675-697.
[77] LALIVE R. Unemployment benefits, unemploymentduration, and post-unemployment jobs:aregression dis-continuity approach[J].American economic review, 2007, 97(2):108-112.
[78] CHU H. Research methods in library and information science:a content analysis[J]. Library&information science research,2015, 37(1):36-41.
[79] 叶鹰,马费成.数据科学兴起及其与信息科学的关联[J].情报学报, 2015, 34(6):575-580.(YE Y, MA F C. Data science:its emergence and linking with information science[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2015,34(6):575-580.)
[80] 池毛毛,杜运周,王伟军.组态视角与定性比较分析方法:图书情报学实证研究的新道路[J].情报学报, 2021, 40(4):424-434.(CHI M M, DU Y Z, WANG W J. Configurational perspective and qualitative comparative analysis:the new way of empirical research in library and information science[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information,2021, 40(4):424-434.)
[81] 邓胜利.信息资源管理学科研究方法知识库构建及其应用研究[J].图书馆工作与研究, 2024(2):5-13, 24.(DENG S L. Construction and application research of research methods knowledge base in information resource[J]. Library work and study, 2024(2):5-13, 24.)
[82] 赵又霖,葛梦真,刘黎明.图书情报领域"实证研究"应用特征及热点探析[J].信息资源管理学报, 2019, 9(4):132-141.(ZHAO Y L, GE M Z, LIU L M. Field distribution and hotspots analysis of empirical research methods[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2019, 9(4):132-141.)
[83] 李大宇,米加宁,宋丽丽.从孔德到哈耶克:社会机制研究的方法论[J].公共管理学报, 2024, 21(1):14-28, 168.(LI D Y, MI J N, SONG L L. The implementation path of mechanismbased empirical research methods in social sciences[J]. Journal of public management, 2024, 21(1):14-28, 168.)
[84] 金胜勇,王超.建立和完善信息秩序:图书馆学的核心价值[J].图书馆理论与实践, 2024(5):9-13, 40.(JIN S Y, WANG C. Establishing and improving information order:the core value of library science[J]. Library theory and practice, 2024(5):9-13,40.)
[85] YU L Z. Back to the fundamentals again:a redefinition of information and associated LIS concepts following a deductive approach[J]. Journal of documentation, 2015, 71(4):795-816.
文章导航

/

〈 〉