[目的/意义] 高校是科技、人才与创新的重要结合点，切实履行高校主体责任是落实国家科研诚信建设的关键。研究高校政策对国家科研诚信政策的响应情况，有助于从顶层设计层面评估高校主体责任的落实情况，为各级政策调整提供理论依据。[方法/过程] 运用政策文献量化方法，构建涵盖政策外部要素特征与文本内容信息的多维响应研究框架，实现142所双一流高校对国家政策的响应现状分析，提出政策调适方向。[结果/结论] 大部分双一流高校政策较为完善，发文高峰均与重要国家政策相关；但政策响应存在一定时滞，响应水平也具有差异；负责响应的高校机构以学术委员会和研究生工作部门为主；面向各类责任主体的政策工具都以命令为主，但政策工具内部结构呈现明显不均衡态势，且高校政策细致化和本土化程度仍欠缺。需在管理水平对齐、政策工具调配、从业队伍管理以及工作内容细化等方面进行调整，切实提升高校科研诚信治理水平。
[Purpose/Significance] Universities are a key nexus for science, technology, talent, and innovation. Effectively fulfilling their responsibilities is critical for the implementation of national research integrity governance. Analyzing universities’ responses to national research integrity policies helps assess the implementation of their responsibilities from a top-level design perspective, offering a theoretical basis for policy adjustments at various levels. [Method/Process] This study employed policiometrics methods to develop a multidimensional framework that incorporated both the external characteristics and textual content of policies. It analyzed the responses of 142 “double first-class” universities to national policies and provided recommendations for policy adjustments. [Result/Conclusion] The findings indicate that most “double first-class” universities have relatively comprehensive research integrity policies, with peaks in policy issuance coinciding with key national policies. However, policy responses exhibit a time lag and vary in their response levels across universities. The primary responsible institutions for policy response are the Academic Committees and Graduate Affairs Offices. Policies targeting different responsible entities predominantly rely on “command” tools, with noticeable imbalances existing in the internal structure of policy tools. Additionally, the detail and localization of university policies remain insufficient, requiring adjustments in areas such as aligning management levels, allocating policy tools, managing the workforce, and refining work processes to effectively improve the governance of university research integrity.
[1] 中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅. 关于进一步加强科研诚信建设的若干意见[EB/OL]. [2025-03-15]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-05/30/content_5294886.htm. (General Office of the CPC Central Committee, General Office of the State Council. Guidelines on further strengthening the construction of research integrity[EB/OL]. [2025-03-15]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-05/30/content_5294886.htm.)
[2] 温虹, 贾利帅. 我国高校科研诚信政策研究——基于政策工具的视角[J]. 中国高教研究, 2021, 322(4): 48-54. (WEN H, JIA L S. Research on scientific research integrity policy in China’s universities: from the perspective of policy tools[J]. China higher education research, 2021, 322(4): 48-54.)
[3] STENECK N. Research universities and scientific misconduct: history, policies, and the future[J]. Journal of higher education, 1994, 65(3): 310-330.
[4] 陈嘉丹. 澳大利亚高校学术诚信制度的实施研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2021. (CHEN J D. Research on the implementation of academic integrity system in Australian universities[D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2021.)
[5] ARMOND A C V, KAKUK P. Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil[J]. Accountability in research, 2023, 30(3): 133-149.
[6] 李佳. 德国科研机构科研诚信建设的实践研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2024. (LI J. Practical research on the promotion of scientific research integrity in German scientific research institutions[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Normal University, 2024)
[7] 袁子晗, 靳彤, 张红伟, 等. 我国42所大学科研诚信教育状况实证分析[J]. 科学与社会, 2019, 9(1): 50-62. (YUAN Z H, JIN T, ZHANG H W, et al. Empirical analysis on academic integrity education of 42 Chinese universities[J]. Science and society, 2019, 9(1): 50-62.)
[8] 靳彤, 赵勇. 国内高校科研诚信管理工作进展研究——基于2019年软科中国最好大学排名前50高校的分析[J]. 情报工程, 2021, 7(5): 87-99. (JIN T, ZHAO Y. Research on the progress of research integrity management in domestic universities: a research based on the analysis of the top 50 universities in Shanghairanking’s best university in 2019[J]. Technology intelligence engineering, 2021, 7(5): 87-99.)
[9] 鲁焰. 高校科研诚信管理问题研究——以浙江省重点建设高校为例[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2023. (LU Y. Study on management of research integrity in university: taking the key universities for construction in Zhejiang as an example[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2023.)
[10] 黄萃, 任弢, 张剑. 政策文献量化研究:公共政策研究的新方向[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015, 12(2): 129-137, 158-159. (HUANG C, REN T, ZHANG J. Policy documents quantitative research: a new direction for public policy study[J]. Journal of public management, 2015, 12(2): 129-137, 158-159.)
[11] 教育部. 2023年全国教育事业发展统计公报[EB/OL]. [2025-01-16]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202410/t20241024_1159002.html. (Ministry of Education. 2023 National educational development statistical bulletin[EB/OL]. [2025-01-16]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202410/t20241024_1159002.html.)
[12] 杨正. 政策计量的应用：概念界限、取向与趋向[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(4): 60-65, 51. (YANG Z. Application of policiometrics: conceptual boundary, orientation and trend[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2019, 38(4): 60-65, 51.)
[13] 赵筱媛, 苏竣. 基于政策工具的公共科技政策分析框架研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2007, 105(1): 52-56. (ZHAO X Y, SU J. An analysis framework for public S&T policies: the perspective of policy tools[J]. Studies in science of science, 2007, 105(1): 52-56.)
[14] MCDONNELL L M, ELMORE R F. Getting the job done: alternative policy instruments[J]. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 1987, 9(2): 133-152.
[15] 教育部. 高校查处学术不端行为有章可依[EB/OL]. [2025-03-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/201607/t20160719_272241.html. (Ministry of Education. Guidelines for universities on handling academic misconduct[EB/OL]. [2025-03-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/201607/t20160719_272241.html.)
[16] 洪大用. 加快推进研究生教育高质量发展，着力造就拔尖创新人才[EB/OL]. [2025-03-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_zt/moe_357/jjyzt_2022/2022_zt17/xxgc/xxgc_bt/202211/t20221125_1002992.html. (HONG D Y. Accelerating the high-quality development of graduate education to cultivate outstanding innovative talent[EB/OL]. [2025-03-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_zt/moe_357/jjyzt_2022/2022_zt17/xxgc/xxgc_bt/202211/t20221125_1002992.html.)
