研究论文

基于CIPP模式的高校图书馆阅读推广成效评价指标体系构建

  • 钟鑫 ,
  • 王宇 ,
  • 王刚
展开
  • 1 沈阳师范大学图书馆 沈阳 110034;
    2 沈阳师范大学教育科学学院 沈阳 110034
钟鑫,馆员,硕士;王宇,研究馆员,硕士;王刚,副教授,博士,通信作者,E-mail:23285565@qq.com。

收稿日期: 2024-11-04

  修回日期: 2025-06-09

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-19

基金资助

本文系2023年度辽宁省图书馆学会研究课题“高校图书馆阅读推广服务效能评价研究”(项目编号:2023tsgxhybkt-020)研究成果之一。

Construction of an Evaluation Index System for the Reading Promotion Effectiveness in University Libraries Based on the CIPP Model

  • Zhong Xin ,
  • Wang Yu ,
  • Wang Gang
Expand
  • 1 Shenyang Normal University Library, Shenyang 110034;
    2 School of Educational Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034
Zhong Xin, Librarian, Master’s Degree; Wang Yu, Research Librarian, Master’s Degree; Wang Gang, Associate Professor, PhD, Correspondent Author, E-mail: 23285565@qq.com.

Received date: 2024-11-04

  Revised date: 2025-06-09

  Online published: 2025-11-19

Supported by

This work is supported by the project of Library Society of Liaoning, titled “Evaluation System of Reading Promotion in University Libraries” (Grant No. 2023tsgxhybkt-020).

摘要

[目的/意义] 构建科学完备的高校图书馆阅读推广成效评价指标体系,是提高高校图书馆阅读推广工作标准化水平、促进新时代高校图书馆高质量内涵式发展的关键举措。[方法/过程] 以CIPP(Context, Input, Process, Product Evaluation)模式为基本框架,以落实高校立德树人根本任务为主线,以融入高校高质量内涵发展为依托,以充分发挥图书馆校园文化中心的引领作用、实现全方位育人为落脚点,从背景、输入、过程和成果4个维度构建高校图书馆阅读推广成效评价模型。基于政策、理论与实践经验依据,拟定高校图书馆阅读推广成效影响因素,综合运用多元因子分析以及层次分析法确定评价指标体系结构与权重。[结果/结论] 构建包含4个评价维度、12项评价指标和59个观测点的高校图书馆阅读推广成效评价指标体系。在对指标体系进行反思的基础上,从评价模式、评价手段、评价人员专业性和评价管理机制等方面提出实施高校图书馆阅读推广成效评价的建议。

本文引用格式

钟鑫 , 王宇 , 王刚 . 基于CIPP模式的高校图书馆阅读推广成效评价指标体系构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2025 , 69(22) : 85 -95 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.22.007

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The construction of a scientific and complete evaluation index system for the effectiveness of reading promotion in university libraries is a key measure to improve the standardization of reading work and to promote the high-quality and substantive development of university libraries in the new era. [Method/Process] Based on the CIPP model as the fundamental framework, with the implementation of the fundamental task of cultivating virtue and fostering talent in higher education institutions as the main line, supported by the integration into the high-quality and connotative development of universities, and aimed at fully leveraging the guiding role of university libraries as cultural centers on campus to achieve comprehensive education, this model constructed an evaluation framework for the effectiveness of library reading promotion in higher education institutions from four dimensions: background, input, process, and outcome. Based on policies, theories, and practical experience, this paper proposed the factors influencing the effectiveness of library reading promotion, and comprehensively employed multi-factor analysis and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine the structure and weighting of the evaluation index system. [Result/Conclusion] A reading promotion effectiveness evaluation system in university libraries is built, which includes 4 evaluation dimensions, 12 evaluation indicators, and 59 observation points. Based on a reflection on the index system, suggestions for implementing the evaluation of university library reading promotion effectiveness are proposed, focusing on evaluation models, evaluation methods, the professionalism of evaluators, and evaluation management mechanisms.

参考文献

[1] 李克强. 政府工作报告—2023年3月5日在第十四届全国人民代表大会第一次会议上[EB/OL]. [2025-06-30]. https://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2023lhzfgzbg/index.htm. (LI K Q. Government Work Report — delivered at the first plenary session of the 14th National People’s Congress on March 5, 2023[EB/OL]. [2025-06-30]. https://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2023lhzfgzbg/index.htm.)
[2] 王宇, 胡永强, 王磊. 全民阅读新阶段的推进策略与图书馆的作为[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022(11): 66-72. (WANG Y, HU Y Q, WANG L. The promotion strategy and library’s action in the new stage of national reading[J]. Library and information service, 2022(11): 66-72.)
[3] 曾瑞鑫. 教育部发布《2023年全国教育事业发展统计公报》[EB/OL]. [2025-06-30]. http://edu.china.com.cn/2024-10/29/content_117513268.shtml. (ZENG R X. MOE: MOE release 2023 National education development statistical bulletin[EB/OL]. [2025-06-30]. http://edu.china.com.cn/2024-10/29/content_117513268.shtml.)
[4] 徐虹, 刘佳. 教育部:把立德树人成效作为检验学校一切工作的根本标准[EB/OL]. [2025-06-30]. https://www.sohu.com/a/458209357_120868911. (XU H, LIU J. MOE: Make the effectiveness of moral education and talent cultivation the fundamental criterion for testing all the work of the school[EB/OL]. [2025-06-30]. https://www.sohu.com/a/458209357_120868911.)
[5] 徐益波, 华东杰. 新时代全民阅读高质量发展推进机制研究[J]. 图书馆研究与工作, 2024(2): 90-96. (XU Y B, HUA D J. Research on the promotion mechanism for high-quality development of nationwide reading in the new era[J]. Library science research & work, 2024(2): 90-96.)
[6] 张文馨, 邓楚悦. 通往阅读推广的高质量发展:关键议题与实践路径——第一届阅读推广标准与评价学术研讨会会议综述[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2023(10): 91-98. (ZHANG W X, DENG CH Y. Key issues and practical pathways of promoting high-quality development through reading: overview of the first symposium on standards and evaluation in reading promotion[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2023(10): 91-98.)
[7] 赵功群. 阅读推广的新方法、新工具、新视角:构建阅读推广标准与评价体系——第二届阅读推广标准与评价学术研讨会会议综述[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2023(10): 99-106. (ZHAO G Q. Constructing reading promotion standards and evaluation system as new methods, new tools, new perspectives in reading promotion: overview of the second symposium on standards and evaluation in reading promotion[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2023(10): 99-106.)
[8] 尹秀波. 读者视角下高校图书馆阅读推广活动评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 大学图书情报学刊, 2016, 34(1): 98-101. (YIN X B. Research on construction of evaluation index system of university library reading promotion from readers’ perspective[J]. Journal of academic library and information science, 2016, 34(1): 98-101.)
[9] 岳修志. 阅读推广活动评价指标体系构建[J]. 图书情报工作2019, 63(5): 42-50. (YUE X Z. Construction of evaluation indicators for reading promotion activities[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(5): 42-50.)
[10] 李爱玲, 余正文, 韩治国. 基于”全评价”理论的高校图书馆阅读推广评价指标体系构建及实证研究[J]. 河北科技图苑, 2024(9): 66-75. (LI A L, YU Z W, HAN Z G. Construction and empirical study of evaluation index system for reading promotion in university libraries based on the theory of comprehensive evaluation[J]. Hebei library journal of science and technology, 2024(9): 66-75.)
[11] 隋晶晶. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的高校图书馆阅读推广效果评价[J]. 江苏科技信息, 2024(4): 80-83. (SUI J J. Evaluation of reading promotion effect of university library based on AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Jiangsu science and technology information, 2024(4): 80-83.)
[12] 张鹏, 杨菲. 基于”3E”理论的中小学图书馆阅读推广活动效果评价研究[J]. 图书馆学刊, 2023(9): 14-25. (ZHANG P, YANG F. Research on the effect evaluation of reading promotion activities in primary and secondary school libraries based on the “3E” theory[J]. Journal of library science, 2023(9): 14-25.)
[13] 王波. 图书馆阅读推广亟待研究的若干问题[J]. 图书与情报, 2011(5): 32-35. (WANG B. Some issues about library reading promotion[J]. Library and information, 2011(5): 32-35.)
[14] 杨婵. 图书馆阅读推广活动的反思与重构[J]. 四川图书馆学报, 2011(2): 60-63. (YANG C. The reflection and reconstruction about the reading promotion activities of library[J]. Journal of the library science society of Sichuan, 2011(2): 60-63.)
[15] 付勃达, 孙海双. “全评价”视角下图书馆阅读推广评价研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2020(3): 159-163. (FU B D, SUN H S. Study on evaluation of library reading promotion from the perspective of “full evaluation”[J]. Library development, 2020(3): 159-163.)
[16] 孙鹏, 王宇, 李天硕. 我国大学图书馆阅读推广评价研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2023(1): 14-20. (SUN P, WANG Y, LI T S. Research on reading promotion evaluating of university library in China[J]. Library work and study, 2023(1): 14-20.)
[17] 吕浩航. 运用CIPP法构建阅读推广评价体系—以深圳技术大学为例[J]. 大学图书情报学刊, 2021(6): 36-41. (LV H H. Construction of the evaluation system of reading promotion with CIPP method: taking Shenzhen Technology University as an example[J]. Journal of academic library and information science, 2021(6): 36-41.)
[18] 周海晨, 陆和建. CIPP理论在高校图书馆阅读推广评估中的应用探析[J]. 图书情报导刊, 2016(12): 11-14. (ZHOU H C, LU H J. Exploration of the application of CIPP theory in assessment of reading promotion in university library[J]. Journal of library and information science, 2016(12): 11-14.)
[19] 马文飞, 杜晨歌, 于梦凡.基于CIPP的高校图书馆阅读推广服务育人质量评价研究[J]. 高校图书馆工作, 2022(4): 58-65. (MA W F, DU C G, YU M F. Educational quality evaluation of reading promotion service in university libraries based on CIPP[J]. Library work in colleges and univercities, 2022(4): 58-65.)
[20] 高振强. CIPP教育评价模式述评[J]. 教学与管理, 1998(1): 57-59. (GAO Z Q. Review of the CIPP educational evaluation model[J]. Teaching and administration, 1998(1): 57-59.)
[21] 蒋国勇. 基于CIPP的高等教育评价的理论与实践[J]. 中国高教研究, 2007(8): 10-12. (JIANG G Y. Theory and practice of higher education evaluation based on CIPP[J]. China higher education research, 2007(8): 10-12.)
[22] 蔡晓良, 庄穆. 国外教育评价模式演进及启示[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2013(3): 37-44. (CAI X L, ZHUANG M. Evolution of western education evaluation models and its enlightenment[J]. Higher education development and evaluation, 2013(3): 37-44.)
[23] 马玲玲. 基于CIPP模型构建综合实践活动课程评价指标体系[J]. 教学与管理, 2020(3): 115-118. (MA L L. Constructing a comprehensive practical activity curriculum evaluation index system based on the CIPP model[J]. Teaching and administration, 2020(3): 115-118.)
[24] 肖远军. CIPP教育评价模式探析[J]. 教育科学, 2003(6): 42-45. (XIAO Y J. Exploration of the CIPP model of educational evaluation[J]. Education science, 2003(6): 42-45.)
文章导航

/

〈 〉