图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2025 , Vol. 69 >Issue 24: 4 - 15

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.24.001

专题：新质生产力视域下的科研创新与知识转化

功勋科学家知识演进的内涵、特征与形态研究

  • 吴志祥 ,
  • 邓会 ,
  • 朱晓峰 ,
  • 张卫 ,
  • 王昊
展开
  • 1 南京工业大学经济与管理学院 南京 211816;
    2 南京农业大学信息管理学院 南京 210005;
    3 南京大学信息管理学院 南京 210023
吴志祥，副教授，博士，硕士生导师，E-mail:1030624832@qq.com;邓会，硕士研究生;朱晓峰，教授，博士，硕士生导师;张卫，助理研究员，博士;王昊，教授，博士，博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2025-01-13

  修回日期: 2025-05-17

  网络出版日期: 2025-12-05

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目“功勋科学家文献资源的知识关联与价值挖掘研究”（项目编号：23CTQ027）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on the Knowledge Evolution of Chinese Meritorious Scientists: Connotations, Characteristics, and Forms

  • Wu Zhixiang ,
  • Deng Hui ,
  • Zhu Xiaofeng ,
  • Zhang Wei ,
  • Wang Hao
Expand
  • 1 School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816;
    2 School of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210005;
    3 School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 211023

Received date: 2025-01-13

  Revised date: 2025-05-17

  Online published: 2025-12-05

Supported by

This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China project titled “Research on Knowledge Association and Value Mining of Documentary Resources of Chinese Meritorious Scientists” (Grant No. 23CTQ027).

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] 功勋科学家不仅为大国重器的研发做出卓越贡献，也承载着共和国优秀科技传统的文化基因。研究其人生历程中的知识演进与各阶段之间的内涵式关系，对于深刻认识该群体具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 以27 位功勋科学家为研究对象，采用扎根理论的程序化编码方式，从 600 余万字长传记全文本中凝练、归纳形成功勋科学家知识演进理论框架，并对其内涵、特征以及知识形态与价值展开分析。[结果/结论] 功勋科学家知识演进阶段包含知识吸纳、知识创造、知识善用、知识传承以及知识渗透；各阶段之间具有时序交叉、因果联动与代际流动的非线性特征；演进过程中知识的形态、功能与价值变迁，体现了“功勋”的知识性、历史性与持久性。研究在启发中国科学家新研究、优化当前杰出科技人才培育新策略、组织中国科学家故事新叙事等方面具有参考价值。

关键词： 功勋科学家; 科学家文献资源; 知识演进; 扎根理论; 知识价值

本文引用格式

吴志祥 , 邓会 , 朱晓峰 , 张卫 , 王昊 . 功勋科学家知识演进的内涵、特征与形态研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2025 , 69(24) : 4 -15 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.24.001

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Chinese meritorious scientists (CMS) not only outstanding contributions to the development of key national technologies but also carry the cultural genes of China’s excellent scientific traditions and thoughts. Studying the knowledge evolution in the life courses and the intrinsic relationships between the stages of their knowledge evolution is of great significance for a deeper understanding of this group. [Method/Process] This study focused on 27 CMS and used a procedural coding method based on grounded theory. From over 6 million words of biographical text, a theoretical framework of the knowledge evolution of Chinese meritorious scientists (KEoCMS) was synthesized and summarized. The study then analyzed the connotations, characteristics, and the transformations of knowledge forms and values during the evolution process. [Result/Conclusion] The stages of knowledge evolution in CMS include knowledge absorption, knowledge creation, knowledge application, knowledge inheritance, and knowledge penetration. These stages exhibit nonlinear characteristics, such as temporal overlap, causal interaction, and intergenerational flow. The transformations of knowledge forms, functions, and values during the evolution reflect the epistemic significance, historical relevance, and lasting impact of CMS’s contributions. This research has reference value for inspiring new studies on Chinese scientists, cultivating contemporary outstanding scientific talents, and organizing new narratives about the stories of Chinese scientists.

Key words： Chinese meritorious scientists; biographical and memoir resources of scientists; knowledge evolution; grounded theory; knowledge value

参考文献

[1] 黄涛, 黄文龙. 杰出科技人才成长的“ 四优环境”—— 以23位 “ 两弹一星” 功勋科学家群体为例[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2015(7): 59-64． (HUANG T, HUANG W L. On Four kinds of excellent environment for the outstanding scientific and technological personnel——A case study for the 23 meritorious scientists group for “two bombs and one satellite” [J]. Studies in dialectics of nature, 2015(7): 59-64.)
[2] WANG G, HU G, LI C, et al. Long live the scientists: Tracking the scientific fame of great minds in physics[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2018, 12(4): 1089-1098.
[3] 张璐, 霍国庆, 李慧聪. 科技创新领军人才关键成功因素研究 —— 以“ 两弹一星” 功勋科学家为例[J]. 管理现代化, 2015, 35(4): 64-66. (ZHANG L, HUO G Q, LI H C. Research on the key success factors of leading talents in scientific and technological innovation: A case study of “two bombs and one satellite” meritorious scientists[J]. Modernization of management, 2015, 35(4): 64-66.)
[4] 宋永辉, 袁蕾涵, 李春东, 等. 中国卓越青年科学家成长特征与科研产出规律研究—— 来自“ 科学探索奖” 获得者的证据[J]. 科学管理研究, 2023, 41(4): 105-116. (SONG Y H, YUAN L H, LI C D, et al. A study of the growth characteristics and research output patterns of outstanding young scientists in China: evidence from the recipients of the Xplorer prize [J]. Scientific management research, 2023, 41(4): 105-116.)
[5] 周光礼, 罗睿. 光环叠加：中国科学精英的生成机制[J]. 教育 研究 , 2021, 42(10): 138-153. (ZHOU G L, LUO R. The superposition of haloes: the mechanism generating China’s scientific elite[J]. Educational research, 2021, 42(10): 138-153.)
[6] 崔林蔚, 陈悦, 杨嘉敏. 双院院士的成长路径对战略科学家培育的启示[J/OL]. 科学学研究, 1-15[2025-10-24]. https://doi. org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20240616.002. (CUI L, CHEN Y, YANG J M. The growth path of dual-academy academicians and implications for cultivating strategic scientists [J/OL]. Studies in science of science, 1-15[2025-10-24]. https://doi.org/10.16192/ j.cnki.1003-2053.20240616.002.)
[7] CAO C. China’s scientific elite[M]. London and New York: Routledge Curzon (Taylor & Francis Group), 2004.
[8] 周亮, 张亚. 中国顶尖学术型人才空间分布特征及其流动趋势 —— 以中国科学院院士为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1749-1763. (ZHOU L, ZHANG Y. The spatial distribution and flow trends of Chinese top academic talents: based on the case study of academicians of Chinese Academy of Sciences[J]. Geographical research, 2019, 38(7): 1749-1763.)
[9] 门伟莉, 张志强. 诺贝尔科学奖跨学科师承效应定量研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(4): 498-506. (MEN W L, ZHANG Z Q. Quantified research on the effects of interdisciplinary accomplished teachers in Nobel prize winners in science[J]. Studies in science of science, 2015, 33(4): 498-506.)
[10] 刘晓娟, 谢瑞婷, 孙镘莉, 等. 高层次科技人才成长中的地区角色研究—— 以国家杰出青年科学基金获得者为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(10): 2110-2121, 2160. (LIU X J, XIE R T, SUN M L, et al. Study on the regional role in the growth of highlevel sci-tech talents: A case study of the national science fund for distinguished young scholars[J]. Studies in science of science, 2024, 42(10): 2110-2121, 2160.)
[11] 田起宏, 刘正奎. 国家杰出青年科学基金获得者的一般特征和早期成长因素探析[J]. 中国高教研究, 2012(10): 21- 24. (TIAN Q H, LIU Z K. The analysis of aational found for distinguished young scholars of the general characteristics and early growth factors[J]. China higher education research, 2012(10): 21-24.)
[12] 刘则渊. 论钱学森的科学学思想[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(1): 5-13. (LIU Z Y. On Hsue-shen Tsien’ s thoughts of the science of science[J]. Studies in science of science, 2012, 30(1): 5-13.)
[13] 王腾, 关忠诚, 郑海军, 等. 全球顶尖科技人才流动的影响因素探析—— 基于扎根理论的分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(7): 1376-1386. (WANG T, GUAN Z C, ZHENG H J, et al. Analysis on the influencing factors of world-class scientific and technological talents flow based on grounded theory[J]. Studies in science of science, 2024, 42(7): 1376-1386.)
[14] ZUCKERMAN H. Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship[J]. American sociological review, 1967, 32(3): 391-403.
[15] JAIMIE MURDOC, COLIN ALLEN, and SIMON DEDEO. Exploration and exploitation of victorian science in Darwin’s reading notebooks[J]. Cognition, 2017, 159: 117-126.
[16] SHI D, LIU W, WANG Y. Has China’s young thousand talents program been successful in recruiting and nurturing top-caliber scientists?[J]. Science, 2023, 379(6627): 62-65.
[17] 任晓亚, 张志强, 陈云伟. 杰出科学家的科研产出规律—— 以拉斯克医学研究奖得主为例[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(9): 894-906. (REN X Y, ZHANG Z Q, CHEN Y W. Laws governing outstanding scientists’ research output: the example of lasker award winners[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(9): 894-906.)
[18] LIU M, HU X. Movers’ advantages: The effect of mobility on scientists’ productivity and collaboration[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2022, 16(3): 101311.
[19] 刘俊婉, 杨波, 王菲菲, 等. 基于LDA主题模型的学术谱系内知识传承研究—— 以谈家桢为核心的遗传学学术谱系为例 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(10): 76-84. (LIU J W, YANG B, WANG F F, et al. Research on knowledge inheritance of academic pedigree based on LDA topic model——A case study of genetics pedigree with the core of Tan Jiazhen[J]. Library and information service, 2018, 62(10): 76-84.)
[20] KUHN T S. The structure of scientific revolutions [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
[21] BONNEY R, PHILLIPS T B, BALLARD H L, et al. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?[J]. Public understanding of science, 2016, 25(1): 2-16.
[22] JOUBERT M, GUENTHER L. In the footsteps of Einstein, Sagan and Barnard: identifying South Africa’s most visible scientists[J]. South African journal of science, 2017, 113(11/12): 1-9.
[23] LOUDER E, WYBORN C, CVITANOVIC C, et al. A synthesis of the frameworks available to guide evaluations of research impact at the interface of environmental science, policy and practice[J]. Environmental science & policy, 2021, 116: 258-265.
[24] 刘宁静, 刘音, 王莫言, 等. 数字人文视角下学术名人知识模型构建研究—— 以李政道数字资源中心为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(23): 113-121. (LIU N J, LIU Y, WANG M Y, et al. Research on the knowledge model construction of famous scholars from the perspective of digital humanism——take the digital resource center of Tsung Dao Lee as an example[J]. Library and information service , 2019, 63(23): 113-121.)
[25] 王兆祥, 蔡晨. 基于知识生命周期的企业知识流模型[J]. 中国 管理 科学 , 2007, 15(2): 126-133. (WANG Z Y, CAI C. A knowledge flow model based on the enterprise knowledge life cycle[J]. Chinese journal of management science, 2007, 15(2): 126-133.)
[26] 吕瑞花, 俞以勤, 韩露, 等. 科技名人档案知识管理实践研究 —— 以老科学家学术成长资料管理为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011, 34(6): 94-96. (LU R H, YU Y Q, HAN L, et al. Research on the practice of knowledge management of science and technology celebrity archives: A case study of the data management of academic growth of old scientists[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2011, 34(6): 94-96.)
[27] SAUER T. Einstein’s working sheets and his search for a unified field theory[J]. The european physical journal H, 2019, 44(5): 371-379.
[28] SCHAEFFER V, ÖCALAN-ÖZEL S, PENIN J. The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach[J]. The journal of technology transfer, 2020, 45: 31-55.
[29] 刘建丽. 百年来中国共产党领导科技攻关的组织模式演化及其制度逻辑[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2021, 42(10): 3-16. (LIU J L. One-hundred-year evolution of organization mode and its institutional logics of scientific and technological breakthroughs under the leadership of the communist party of China[J]. Research on economics and management, 2021, 42(10): 3-16.)
[30] CANDIA C, JARA-FIGUEROA C, RODRIGUEZ-SICKERT C, et al. The universal decay of collective memory and attention[J]. Nature human behaviour, 2019, 3:82-91.
[31] ANSHARI M, HAMDNA M. Understanding knowledge management and upskilling in fourth industrial revolution: transformational shift and SECI model[J]. VINE journal of information and knowledge management systems, 2022, 52(3): 373-393.
[32] 韩震. 知识形态演进的历史逻辑[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(6): 168-185, 207-208. (HAN Z. The historical logic of the evolution of knowledge forms[J]. Social sciences in China, 2021(6): 168- 185, 207-208.)
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉