Library and Information Service >
Applicability of h-index in Humanities and Social Sciences Achievements Evaluation
Received date: 2012-08-15
Revised date: 2012-10-15
Online published: 2013-01-20
Regarding the top 50 research institutions of ARWU (Academic Ranking of World University) published by Shanghai Jiao Tong University as research object and the data of Web of Science as statistical source, this paper analyzes the association between h-index, ARWU evaluation indexes and traditional bibliometrics indexes. The results show that both h-index and core indexes of ARWU are associated with total articles published and total cites, total cites and single cite respectively fit Hirsch model and Glanzel-Shubert model. Finally it calculates their parameter α and c in two models, to provide the empirical basis for the theoretical study of applicability of h-index in humanities and social sciences.
Wang Xin , Jin Zhenyan . Applicability of h-index in Humanities and Social Sciences Achievements Evaluation[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(02) : 85 -91 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.02.017
[1] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005,102 (46): 16569-16572.
[2] Rousseau R. New developments related to the hirsch index [J].科学观察,2006,1(4): 23-25.
[3] Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index [J]. Scientometrics, 2006,69(1):131-152.
[4] Egghe L.Examples of simple transformations of the h-index:Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2008,2(2):136-148.
[5] Schreiber M. To share the fame in a fair way, hm for muti-authored manuscripts [J]. New Journal of Physics, 2008,10(4):1-9.
[6] Braun T, Glnzel W, Achubert A. A hirsch-type index for journals [J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69 (1): 169-173.
[7] Schubert A. Auccessive h-indices [J]. Scientometrics, 2007,70 (1):201-205.
[8] Van Raan A. Comparison of the hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgement for 147 chemistry research groups [J]. Scientometrics, 2006,67(3): 491-502.
[9] Hodge D R, Lacasse J R. Evaluating journal quality: Is the h-index a better measure than impact Factors? [J]. Reaserch on Social Work Practice, 2011,21(2): 222-230.
[10] Lacasse J R, Hodge D R, Bean K F. Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index [J]. Reaserch on Social Work Practice, 2011,21(5):599-607.
[11] 丁楠,潘有能,叶鹰. 基于CSSCI的文科学者h指数实证研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2009(2):55-60.
[12] 金贞燕. h指数与学术排名评价指标体系的关联性分析[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(4):33-38.
[13] 上海交通大学高等教育研究院. Academic ranking of world universities-2010 [EB/OL].[2010-11-01].http://www.arwu.org/Chinese/aboutARWU.jsp.
[14] 任胜利,王宝庆,郭志明,等. 应慎重使用期刊的影响因子评价科研成果[J].科学通报, 2007,45(2):218-222.
[15] Glänzel W. On the h-index A mathematical approach to new measure of publication activity and citation impact [J]. Scientometrics, 2006,67(2):315-321.
[16] 赵星.h指数与论文数量的相关性探讨[J].情报资料工作, 2010(1):35-38.
[17] 方海明. 对我国大学评价与排名的量化分析与比较[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2006, 22(10):20-27.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
