Library and Information Service >
Interest Game in NIH's Mandatory Open Access Policy——From the View of Multiple Actors Interaction
Received date: 2012-12-17
Revised date: 2013-02-26
Online published: 2013-03-20
After investigating the implementation of NIH's mandatory open access policy, this paper analyzes the interest game relationship among multiple actors, and the redistribution process of knowledge resource from the view of sociology of science. The results show that multiple actors have different benefit demand and value judgment in the implementation of mandatory open access, and its nature is to build the new interest balance among multiple actors. It provides the positive references for the research funding department to make relevant policy, for universities and research institutes to manage, and even for researchers to publish scientific in China.
Key words： open access; multiple actors; interest game
Ding Dawei , Zhong Cantao . Interest Game in NIH's Mandatory Open Access Policy——From the View of Multiple Actors Interaction[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(06) : 43 -48 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.06.008
[1] 丁大尉,李正风.科学信息的开放存取与知识的"公有性"信念[J].科学学研究,2011(10):1473-1479.
[2] 安德鲁·查德威克.互联网政治学:国家、公民与新传播技术[M].任孟山,译.北京:华夏出版社,2010:65.
[3] Arzberger P,Schroeder P,Beaulieu A,et al.Promoting access to public research data for scientific,economic,and social development[J].Data Science Journal,2004(3):135-152.
[4] Davis P M.Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature:A citation analysis[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009,60(1):3-8.
[5] Frandsen T F. Scholarly communication changing:The implications of open access[D].Copenhagen:Royal School of Library and Information Science,2009.
[6] Wright K,Light K, Stirk L.What's on the Web?Open access research[J].Journal of Health Services Research & Policy,2011,16(1):62-64.
[7] Royster P.Publishing original content in an institutional repository[J].Serial Reviews,2008,34(1):27-30.
[8] Scholze F.Internationa lisation of information services for publishers' open access policies [EB/OL].[2012-12-16].http://www.peh-med.com/content/3/1/19
[9] Suber P.SPARC open access newsletter,5/2/2006[EB/OL].[2012-11-18].http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/05-02-06.htm#frpaa
[10] 付晚花,肖冬梅.美国NIH公共获取政策及对我们的启示[J].图书馆杂志,2008(10):59-62.
[11] 张宏胜.美国开放存取运动中的政策博弈[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(21):54-57.
[12] Reichman J H,Uhlir P F.A contractually resconstructed research commons for scientific data in a highly protectionist intellectual property environment[J].Law and Contemporary Problems,2003,66(1/2):315-462.
[13] NIH. Enhanced public access to NIH research information[EB/OL].[2012-01-16]. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-04-064.html
[14] Department of Health and Human Services.National Institutes of Health report on the NIH public access policy[EB/OL].[2012-04-05].http://publicaccess.nih.gov/Final_Report_20060201.pdf.
[15] PubMed Central.PMC hits two million mark[EB/OL].[2011-06-16].http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/new_in_pmc.html#day12.
[16] 钟灿涛.科学交流体系重组的动力因素分析[J].科学学研究,2011(9):1304-1310.
[17] 德兰迪.知识社会中的大学[M].黄建如,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2010:127,148
[18] 公共获取政策首次成为永久制度[J].现代图书情报技术,2009(6):84.
[19] Misleading open accers myths[EB/OL].[2012-03-30].http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/advocacy12.
[20] Policy on enhancing public access to archived publications resulting from NIH-funded research[EB/OL].[2012-04-04]. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-05-022.html.
[21] 沈东婧,王斌,江晓波.美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)公共获取案例解析及启示[J].情报工作理论与实践,2009(S1):123-125.
[22] 古斯顿.在政治与科学之间——确保科学研究的诚信与产出率[M]. 龚旭,译.北京:科学出版社,2011:71,54.
[23] Arrow K.Wealth and Welfare[M].Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1962:36.
[24] Kuchma I.Open access,equity,and strong economy in developing and transition countries:Policy perspective[J].Seiral Reviews,2008,34(1):13-20.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
