Library and Information Service >
Government Open Data and Value-added Information: Case Studies of Taiwan E-Government
Received date: 2013-04-10
Revised date: 2013-05-04
Online published: 2013-05-20
Supported by
This research explores the current development of government open data in Taiwan by using a case study methodology. The study finds out that government open data has evolved to maturity in Taiwan and the authority plans to make laws to form a comprehensive government open data. Statistics show that government open data directly affects the value-added information, because it could help the public to access the government open data more effectively and makes it easier for the public to create value-added government information. Six dimensions are suggested to focus on during the initial development of government open data. The six dimensions are legislation and policy, sharing approaches, technological standard and data format, types of open data, promotions of open data, and copyright and license.
Key words： data open; information sharing; value-added information; government; Taiwan
Yang Tungmou , Lo Jin , Wang Huiju , Shiang Jing . Government Open Data and Value-added Information: Case Studies of Taiwan E-Government[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(10) : 63 -69 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.10.010
[1] 项靖. 公务人员对政府信息公开制度的见解之探究[J]. 法政学报, 2001, 12: 1-52.
[2] 廖淑君. 政府信息加值利用与管理法制研究:以美国及英国为例[J]. 科技法律透析, 2007, 19(7): 35-61.
[3] 潘竞恒, 李长晏,许耀明.政府信息再利用之法制化研究[M]. 台湾: 研究发展考核委员会, 2009.
[4] 邱炯友. 政府信息加值再利用政策之研究[C]//出版与图书馆学术研讨会论文集. 台北:淡江大学信息与图书馆学系, 2002.
[5] Pira International, Commercial exploitation of Europe’s public sector information, supra note9[EB/OL].[2012-03-20]. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/docs/pdfs/pira_study/commercial_final_report.pdf.
[6] Heeks R. Benchmarking e-government:Improving the national and international measurement, evaluation and comparison of e-government[M].Manchester: University of Manchester, 2006.
[7] Schumpeter J A.Capitalism, socialism and democracy[M]. New York: Harper & Row,1942.
[8] Rogers E M.Diffusion of innovations(4th Ed.)[M]. New York: The Free Press,1995.
[9] Obama B. Memorandum on transparency and open government[EB/OL].[2012-03-03].http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment.
[10] Dawes S S, Helbig N. Open government with information[M].Albang,New York Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany,2009.
[11][EB/OL].[2013-03-06]. http://data.gov.uk/data.
[12] Dietrich D,Gray J,McNamara R,et al. The open data handbook[EB/OL].[2013-01-29]. http://opendatahandbook.org.
[13] Berners-Lee T. Linked data[EB/OL].[2013-01-29]. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
[14] Yang Tungmou, Maxwell T A. Information-sharing in public organizations:A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2011, 28(2): 164-175.
[15] Gil-Garcia J R, Chengalur-Smith I, Duchessi P. Collaborative e-government:Impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2007, 16(2): 121-133.
[16] 胡龙腾,曾冠球. 电子治理下的跨域整合管理:个案评估[M]. 台湾:研究发展考核委员会:电子治理研究中心, 2009.
[17] 曾冠球, 胡龙腾,庄文忠. 电子治理下的跨域整合管理:第二阶段暨G2G成效评估[M]. 台北:电子治理研究中心, 2010.
[18] Pardo T A, Tayi G K. Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2007, 24(4): 691-715.
[19] 胡龙腾, 张镫文,杨文钤. 你,愿意分享吗？公部门组织成员知识分享行为之底蕴[J]. 东吴政治学报, 2008, 26(3): 57-114.
[20] Faerman S R, McCaffrey D P, Van Slyke D M. Understanding interorganizational cooperation: Public-private collaboration in regulating financial market innovation[J]. Organization Science, 2001, 12(3): 372-388.
[21] Landsbergen D J, Wolken G J. Realizing the promise: Government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology[J]. Public Administration Review, 2001, 61(2): 206-220.
[22] Zhang Jing, Dawes S S. Expectations and perceptions of benefits, barriers, and success in public sector knowledge networks[J]. Public Performance & Management Review, 2006, 29(4): 433-466.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
