Library and Information Service >
The Solution on “Snow Proposition” in Domestic Library Science Research：Routes Choice of Interdisciplinary Research
Received date: 2013-07-29
Revised date: 2013-08-03
Online published: 2013-08-20
The debate between technology and humanity in library science research is explained based on the angel of two kinds of culture division from "snow proposition". Based on these, this paper puts forward the interdisciplinary research to solve the problem. The five major routes include research starting point,research leading clue, research organization form and evaluation mechanism.
Li Yanbo . The Solution on “Snow Proposition” in Domestic Library Science Research：Routes Choice of Interdisciplinary Research[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(16) : 30 -34 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.16.006
[1] C.P.斯诺.两种文化[M].纪树立,译.北京:三联书店,1994:1-50.
[2] 刘艳苏.90年代我国图书馆学跨学科研究述要[J].图书馆建设,2000(5):87-90.
[3] 王绪琨.交叉科学结构论[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2003:6.
[4] 姜继.中国图书馆学的跨学科研究[J].中国图书馆学报,1995(6):18-24.
[5] Palmer P J. Community,conflict, and ways of knowing: Ways to deepen our educational agenda[J].The Magazine of Higher Learning,1987(5):20-25.
[6] John-Steiner V. The challenge of studying collaboration[J]. American Educational Research Journal,1998(4):773-783.
[7] 周礼智.论图书馆本质与图书馆学的人文学科属性及其关联[J].图书馆学研究,2012(15):11-14.
[8] 张力.图书馆学研究范式的"人文"属性研究[J].情报资料工作,2009(4):21-24.
[9] 周欣平.对中国图书馆学教育的一些思考[J].图书馆建设,2001(1):26-28.
[10] 慕岳,永利,玉玮.对图书馆学教育几个问题的思考[J].中国图书馆学报,1995(2):74-77,69.
[11] 裴成发,李嘉琳.20世纪的中国图书馆学教育[J].晋图学刊,1998(4):1-5.
[12] 王子舟.中国图书馆学教育九十年回望与反思[J].中国图书馆学报,2009(6):70-78,96.
[13] 程焕文,潘燕桃,倪莉,等.1999-2003年中国图书馆学教育进展(续二)[J].大学图书馆学报,2005(1):68-73.
[14] 顾建民.学科差异与学术评价[J].高等教育研究,2006(2):42-46.
[15] Huang K.Rita Cowell's vision for interdisciplinary science in the 21st century[DB/OL].[2013-05-15].http://dujs.dartmouth.edu/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/huang.pdf.
[16] Huutoniemi K.Evaluating interdisciplinary research.The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2010:1-10.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
