Library and Information Service >
The Problems of Commercialized Information Database Monopoly and Its Countermeasure
Received date: 2013-07-19
Revised date: 2013-08-04
Online published: 2013-08-20
Commercial information databases have become the mainstream of online academic information publishing. In order to pursue the maximization of their own interests, database providers often enhance their monopoly position through "Resource Monopolize", "Technical Control", "Policy Dominate"and some other methods. But these methods hinder the effective dissemination of knowledge and information, and even damage the rights of knowledge receivers and contributors. Multi-channel access to information such as"Open Access","Outright Purchase Service" and "Sponsor Open Publishing"could alleviate existing contradictions. The essential way for database's transition is to be more specialized segments. The long-term mechanism is to develop and improve protection law of intellectual property and anti-monopoly.
Li Mingli . The Problems of Commercialized Information Database Monopoly and Its Countermeasure[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(16) : 35 -39 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.16.007
[1] 刘义程.知识产权拒绝许可的反垄断法研究[D].上海:华东政法学院,2006.
[2] Gross R. Buy the numbers: Publishers seek special database monopoly protections[J]. Multinational Monitor,2004,25(7/8):21-23.
[3] 中国科学院国家科学图书馆.我国33家图书馆联合反对个别国际出版商大幅涨价行为[EB/OL].[2013-06-01]. http://www.cas.ac.cn/xw/zyxw/yw/201009/t20100909_2957268.shtml.
[4] 龙柯宇.知识产权垄断性检讨[J].法制与社会,2013(10):60-63.
[5] 吕明瑜.知识产权垄断呼唤反垄断法制度创新——知识经济视角下的分析[J].中国法学,2009(04):16-33.
[6] 孙静.知识产权滥用行为的反垄断法规制研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2012.
[7] 王雷.我国知识产权滥用的反垄断法律规制研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2012.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
