Library and Information Service >
The Putting Forward Process and Research Progress of Altmetrics
Received date: 2013-08-21
Revised date: 2013-09-20
Online published: 2013-10-05
The background of altmetrics is summarized into two parts: the limitation of traditional bibliometrics and opportunities brought by online research environment. According to characteristics of altmetrics, the developing progress is divided into three parts, namely brewing stage, proposing and hot stage and theoretical and application research deepening stage. Content and characteristic of each stage was further illustrated. Then the status quo of altmetrics was summarized from aspects of themes of main academic activities, main author group, content of representative publications etc. On this basis discussion about the further development of altmetrics was given. It aimed at arousing attention of domestic scholars, publishers, libraries, information service departments and other related staff and departments, in order to adapt to the scholarly communication and evaluation system reform.
Qiu Junping , Yu Houqiang . The Putting Forward Process and Research Progress of Altmetrics[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(19) : 5 -12 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.19.001
[1] Garfield E, Merton R K. Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities[M]. New York: Wiley, 1979.
[2] Garfield E.The history and meaning of the journal impact factor[J].JAMA,2006,295(1):90-93.
[3] Galligan F,Dyas-Correia S. Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure[J].Serials Review,2013,39(1):56-61.
[4] 杨思洛.引文分析存在的问题及其原因探究[J].中国图书馆学报,2011,37(3):108-117.
[5] Lane J.Let's make science metrics more scientific[J].Nature,2010,464(7288):488-489.
[6] Macroberts M, Macroberts B.Problems of citation analysis[J].Scientometrics,1996,36(3):435-444.
[7] Peritz B C.On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1992,43(6):448-451.
[8] Bornmann L,Daniel H D.What do citation counts measure? a review of studies on citing behavior[J].Journal of Documentation,2008,64(1):45-80.
[9] Kostoff R N.The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation[J].Scientometrics,1998,43(1):27-43.
[10] Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, et al. Altmetrics: A manifesto[EB/OL].[2013-06-28]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
[11] Community cleverness required[J].Nature,2008,455(7209):1.
[12] Priem J. I like the term #articlelevelmetrics, but it fails to imply *diversity* of measures. Lately, I'm liking #altmetrics[EB/OL].[2013-10-08].https://twitter.com/#!/jasonpriem/status/25844968813.
[13] Piwowar H.Altmetrics: Value all research products[J].Nature,2013,493(7431):159.
[14] Groth P,Taraborelli D,Priem J. Altmetrics:Tracking scholarly impact on the social Web[J].ISSI Newsletter,2011(2):70-72.
[15] Birkholz J,Wang Shenghui. Who are we talking about the validity of online metrics for commenting on science[EB/OL].[2013-06-28].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/birkholz-v0/.
[16] Priem J,Piwowar H A,Hemminger B M. Altmetrics in the wild:Using social media to explore scholarly impact[EB/OL].[2013-10-01].http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745.
[17] Bar-Ilan J.Jasist@Mendeley[EB/OL].[2013-09-20].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/ba-rican.
[18] Torres-Salinas D,Cabezas-Clavijo A,Jimenez-Contreras E.Altmetrics: New Indicators for scientific communication in Web 2.0[EB/OL].[2013-09-20].http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6595.
[19] Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, et al. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social Web services[J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8(5): e64841.
[20] Roemer R C,Borchardt R.From bibliometrics to altmetrics:A changing scholarly landscape[J].College & Research Libraries News,2012,73(10):596-600.
[21] McSweeney P, Prince R, Hargood C, et al. Aggregated erevnametrics:Vringing together alt-metrics through research objects[EB/OL].[ 2011-12-21].http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/272207/6/Altmetricspaper.html
[22] Arbesman S. Altmetrics for eurekometrics[EB/OL].[2011-12-21]. http://ahmetrics, org/workshop2011/arbesman-v0.
[23] Neylon C. Re-use as impact: How re-assessing what we mean by “impact” can support improving the return on public investment, develop open research practice, and widen engagement[EB/OL].[2011-05-03].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/neylon-v0/.
[24] Holbrook B. Peer review, altmetrics, and ex ante broader impacts assessment-A proposal[EB/OL].[2012-07-21].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/holbrook/.
[25] Iorns E.Reproducibility:An important altmetric[EB/OL].[2012-07-21].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/iorns/.
[26] Sutherland W J, Goulson D, Potts S G, et al. Quantifying the impact and relevance of scientific research[J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6(11): e27537.
[27] Duin D,Van den Besslaar P.The search for alternative metrics for taxonomy[EB/OL]. [2011-05-03].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/duin-v0/.
[28] Tarrant D, Carr L. Using the co-citation network to indicate article impact[EB/OL]. [2011-05-03]. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/272684/1/alt-metrix.pdf.
[29] Parra C,Birukou A,Casati F,et al.UCount:A community-driven approach for measuring scientific reputation[EB/OL].[2011-05-03].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/parra-v0/.
[30] Kaur J, Bollen J. Structural patterns in online usage[EB/OL]. [2012-07-21].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/kaur/.
[31] Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, et al. A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures[J]. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4(6): e6022.
[32] Waagmeester A, Palidwor G, Szczesny P, et al. Acknowledging contributions to online expert assistance[EB/OL]. [2011-05-03].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/waagmeester-v0/.
[33] Fausto S, Machado F A, Bento L F J, et al. Research blogging:Indexing and registering the change in science 2.0[J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7(12): e50109.
[34] Shema H, Bar-Ilan J. Characteristics of ResearchBlogging.org science blogs and bloggers[EB/OL].[2013-06-07 ]. http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/shema-v0/.
[35] Shema H,Bar-Ilan J. Characteristics of Researchblogging.org science blogs and bloggers[EB/OL].[2013-10-01].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/shema-v0/.
[36] Gunn W, Reichelt J. Social metrics for research quanlity and quality[EB/OL]. [2012-07-21]. http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/gunn/.
[37] Wassef A. Altmetrics peer evaluation a case study[EB/OL].[2011-05-03].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/wassef-v0/.
[38] Price R.Altmetrics and Academia.edu[EB/OL]. [2012-07-21].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/price/.
[39] Kaur J, Hoang D T, Sun X, et al. Scholarometer: A social framework for analyzing impact across disciplines[J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7(9): e43235.
[40] Desai T, Shariff A, Shariff A, et al. Tweeting the meeting: An in-depth analysis of Twitter activity at Kidney Week 2011[J]. POLS ONE, 2012, 7(7): e40253.
[41] Uren V, Dadzie A S. Relative trends in scientific terms on Twitter[J]. [2011-05-03]. http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/uren-v0/.
[42] Shuai X, Pepe A, Bollen J. How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations[J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7(11): e47523.
[43] Yan K K, Gerstein M. The spread of scientific information:Insights from the Web usage statistics in PLOS article-level metrics[J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6(5): e19917.
[44] Waagmeester A,Evelo C T. Measuring impact in online resources with the CI-number (the CitedIn Number for online impact) [EB/OL]. [2011-05-03].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/waagmeester-evelo-v0/.
[45] Lin J. A case study in anti-gaming mechanisms for altmetrics: PLOS ALMs and DataTrust [EB/OL].[2012-07-21].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/lin/.
[46] Fenner M.Altmetrics will be taken personally at PLOS[EB/OL]. [2012-07-21].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/fenner/.
[47] Schroeder R, Power L, Meyer E T. Putting scientometrics 2.0 in its place [EB/OL].[2011-05-03].http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/schroeder-v0/.
[48] Barr K.The role of altmetrics and peer review in the democratization of knowledge[EB/OL].[2012-07-21]. http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/barr/.
[49] 刘春丽.Web 2.0环境下的科学计量学:选择性计量学[J].图书情报工作,2012(14):52-56,92.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
