Library and Information Service >
Quality Evaluation of Social Tagging Based on the Type of Tags
Received date: 2013-10-08
Revised date: 2013-11-08
Online published: 2013-12-05
Most social tags take a free indexing way, and part of the tags can't reveal the content or subject matter of the resources. Therefore, a lot of low-quality tags generated to interfere the order of the social tagging system resource organizations, and to reduce the tags' quality in the application and customer satisfaction. This study carried a quality evaluation of social tagging based on the type of tags and developed a label quality evaluation site. On the one hand, volunteers divide the type of blog tags, book tags, picture tags, video tags, and music tags on the site and collect the training data set and test set of tags types. On the other hand, volunteers rate tags and collect training data set and test data set of label quality assessment, in order to provide data to support future research based on tag type label quality assessment.
Key words： social tags; the type of tags; the quality of tags; quality evaluation
Li Lei , Wang Mian , Zhang Chengzhi . Quality Evaluation of Social Tagging Based on the Type of Tags[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(23) : 11 -16,9 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.23.002
[1] Anusua T, Piyush R, Hal D, et al. Leveraging social bookmarks from partially tagged corpus for improved webpage clustering[J]. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2011, 2(3): 111-130.
[2] Zubiaga A, Martínez R, Fresno V. Getting the most out of social annotations for Web page classification[C]//Proceedings of the 9th ACM symposium on Document engineering. Germany:ACM, 2009: 74-83.
[3] Zhou Ding, Bian Jiang, Zheng Shuyi, et al. Exploring social annotations for information retrieval[C]// Proceedings of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference. Beijing: 2008: 715-724.
[4] Zhao Shiwan, Du Nan, Nauerz A.et al. Improved recommendation based on collaborative tagging behaviors[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. Gran Canaria:ACM, 2008:413-416.
[5] Goh D H, Chua A, Lee C S, et al. Resource discovery through social tagging: A classification and content analytic approach[J]. Online Information Review, 2009, 33(3):568 -583.
[6] Gu Xiwu, Wang Xianbing, Li Ruixuan, et al. Measuring social tag confidence: Is it a good or bad tag?[J]. Web-Age Information Management Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, 6897:94-105.
[7] Lee S E, Han S S K. Qtag:Introducing the qualitative tagging system[C]//Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. New York: ACM, 2007: 35-36.
[8] Sen S, Harper F M, LaPitz A, et al. The quest for quality tags[C]//Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work. New York: ACM, 2007: 361-370.
[9] Zhang S, Farooq U, Carroll J M. Enhancing information scent: Identifying and recommending quality tags[C]//Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. New York: ACM, 2009: 1-10.
[10] Belém F M, Martins E F, Almeida J M, et al. Exploiting co-occurrence and information quality metrics to recommend tags in web 2.0 applications[C]//Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 2010: 1793-1796.
[11] Guy M, Tonkin E. Tidying up tags[J]. D-lib Magazine, 2006, 12(1): 1082-9873.
[12] 徐静, 卢章平.基于folksonomy的信息组织及其优化[J].新世纪图书馆, 2011(4):34-37.
[13] Lawson K G. Mining social tagging data for enhanced subject access for readers and researchers[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2009, 35(6): 574-582.
[14] Thomas M, Caudle D M, Schmitz C M. To tag or not to tag?[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2009, 27(3): 411-434.
[15] Lu Caimei, Jung-ran Park, Hu Xiaohua.User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison of LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings[J].Journal of Information Science, 2010, 36(6):763-779.
[16] Hall C E, Zarro M A. What do you call it?: A comparison of library-created and user-created tags[C]//Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries. New York: ACM, 2011: 53-56.
[17] Chen S J. User tagging for digital archives: The case of commercial keywords from the grand secretariat[M]//Digital Libraries: For Cultural Heritage, Knowledge Dissemination, and Future Creation. Berlin:Springer, 2011: 158-167.
[18] Al-Khalifa H S, Davis H C. Folksonomies versus Automatic Keyword Extraction: An Empirical Study[J].Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Colorado: AAAI Press, 2007.
[19] Lai V, Rajashekar C, Rand W. Comparing Social Tags to Microblogs[C]//Privacy, security, risk and trust (passat), 2011 Ieee Third International Conference on and 2011 Ieee Third International Conference on Social Computing (socialcom). IEEE, 2011: 1380-1383.
[20] Koutrika G, Effendi F A, Gy?ngyi Z, et al. Combating spam in tagging systems[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web. Banff: ACM, 2007: 57-64.
[21] Kwan Yi, Chan Yun Yoo. An empirical examination of the associations between social tags and Web queries[J].Information Research, 2012, 17(3): 527-533.
[22] 覃希, 夏宁霞, 苏一丹. 基于支持向量机的垃圾标签检测模型[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2010, 27(10): 3893-3895.
[23] Sen S, Lam S K, Rashid A M, et al. Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution[C]//Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Banff: ACM, 2006: 181-190.
[24] Xu Z, Fu Y, Mao J, et al. Towards the semantic web: Collaborative tag suggestions[C]//Collaborative web tagging workshop at WWW2006. Edinburgh: ACM, 2006.
[25] Melenhorst M, van Setten M. Usefulness of tags in providing access to large information systems[C]//Professional Communication Conference. Scattle: IPCC, 2007: 1-9.
[26] Bischoff K, Firan C S, Kadar C, et al. Automatically identifying tag types[M]//Advanced Data Mining and Applications. Berlin:Springer, 2009: 31-42.
[27] Heymann P, Paepcke A, Garcia-Molina H. Tagging human knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2010: 51-60.
[28] Böhnstedt D, Lehmann L, Rensing C, et al.Automatic identification of tag types in a resource-based learning scenario[M]//Towards Ubiquitous Learning. Berlin:Springer, 2011: 57-70.
[29] Böhnstcdt D, Lehmann L, Rensing C, et al Automatic identification of tag types in a resource-based leaming scenario[C]//Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning:Towards Ubiquitous Learning.Palermo, Italy, 2011:57-70.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
