Library and Information Service >
Comparative Study on Books Social Tags of Chinese-English Translation
Received date: 2013-10-08
Revised date: 2013-11-08
Online published: 2013-12-05
With the development of Web2.0, social annotation system has affected the traditional information organization in libraries. Taking the books of Chinese-English translation as the research objects, this paper collects social tags from Douban, Amazon and Librarything, and gets the subject headings of MARC records from National Library of China and Library of Congress, to explore the differences between tags and subject headings of two types of vocabulary of each book in the length, number and the similarity. The results show the differences in length, number and similarity of social tags or subject headings of different languages, differences in those of books in different catalogues, and differences between tags and subject headings of a single book. This study can help the libraries to have a good knowledge of social tags and improve the service with them.
Key words： social tag; book annotation; subject heading; social annotation
Lu Chao , Zhang Chengzhi . Comparative Study on Books Social Tags of Chinese-English Translation[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(23) : 17 -23 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.23.003
[1] 宋彩萍, 霍国庆. 信息组织论纲[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 1997(1):20-37.
[2] 徐少同, 李书宁, 徐文贤. OPAC 2.0发展研究[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2007, 27(5):86-88.
[3] DeZelar-Tiedman C. Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works: Social tagging in academic library catalogs[J].Library Resources and Technical Services, 2011, 55(4): 221-233.
[4] Tonkin E. Searching the long tail: Hidden structure in social tagging[C]//Proceedings of the 18th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research. Austin:The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006:1-10.
[5] Rae A, Siqurbjörnsson B, van Zwol R. Improving tag recommendation using social networks[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Adaptivity, Personalization and Fusion of Heterogeneous Information.Paris:Le Centre De Hautes Etudes InternationalesD'informatiqueDocumentaire, 2010: 92-99.
[6] Xu Zhichen, Fu Yun, Mao Jianchang, et al. Towards the semantic Web:Collaborative tag suggestions[C]//Proceedings of Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006.Edinburgh:University of Soathampton, 2006:1-8.
[7] Lee S O K, Chun A H W. A Web 2.0 tag recommendation algorithm using hybrid ANN semantic structures[J]. International Journal of Computers, 2007(1):49-58.
[8] 钟青燕, 苏一丹, 梁胜勇.基于层次聚类和语义的标签推荐研究[J].微计算机信息, 2010(3-6):199-203.
[9] 刘知远. 基于文档主题结构的关键词抽取方法研究[D].北京:清华大学, 2011.
[10] Brooks C H, Montanez N. Improved annotation of the blogosphere via autotagging and hierarchical clustering[C]//Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web. Edinburge:ACM, 2006:625-632.
[11] Shilad S, Jesse V, John R. Learning to recognize valuable tags[C]//Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces.Sahibel Island:ACM, 2009:87-96.
[12] Rolla P J. User tags versus subject headings:Can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections[J]. LRTS, 2008, 53(3):174-184.
[13] Thomas M, Caudle D M, Schmitz C M. To tag or not to tag[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2009, 27(3): 411-434.
[14] Lu Caimei, Park J, Hu Xiaohua. User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison of LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress subject headings[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2010, 36 (6): 763-779.
[15] 吴丹, 林若楠, 冯倩然, 等. 社会标签的规范性研究——图书标注[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2012, 32(1):1-7.
[16] Wu Dan, He Daqing, Qiu Jin, et al. Comparing social tags with subject headings on annotating books: A study comparing the information science domain in English and Chinese[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2013, 39(2): 169-187.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
