Library and Information Service >
Revolution and Enlightenment of Accreditation Systems of Library and Information Science Education in America
Received date: 2013-11-15
Revised date: 2013-12-01
Online published: 2013-12-20
Based on methods of literature survey and content analysis, this paper induces and analyzes the development processes of library and information science education in America, and its revolutions in the principles of making standards about accreditation, applicative discipline scopes, accreditation objects and basic terms of accreditation systems. It finds that principles of making standards about accreditation have changed from emphasis on quantity to quality, applicative discipline scopes are expanded from library science to library and information science, accreditation objects have changed from all kinds of library schools in early stages to schools or departments which have the right to grant master degree of library and information science, and basic terms of accreditation standards have changed in mission and goals, curriculum, faculty, students, administration and financial support, physical resources and facilities. Those revolutions give some enlightenments to library and information science education in China, which include that postgraduate education of library and information science should be emphasized and developed, an integration disciplines of library and information science should be established, the quality of library and information science education should be improved, and the accreditation standards of library and information science education should be made.
Wang Zhibo , Sheng Xiaoping . Revolution and Enlightenment of Accreditation Systems of Library and Information Science Education in America[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(24) : 39 -43 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.24.005
[1] 王梅玲.美国图书馆学与资讯科学教育的认可制度与标准[J].图书资讯学刊, 2000(15): 69-85.
[2] 唐承秀.美国图书馆学教育质量控制评析[J].图书与情报, 2006(4):39-43.
[3] 赵光林.美国图书馆学信息学教育认可制度[J].图书馆杂志, 2003(6):63-71.
[4] 于春明.《图书馆学情报学硕士学位认可标准》介绍[J].图书馆建设, 2011(11):16-18.
[5] Shera J H. The foundations of education for librarianship[M]. New York: Becker and Hayes, 1972:238.
[6] Hayes R M. Accreditation[J]. Library Trends, 1986, 34(4):537-559.
[7] American Library Association. Standards for accreditation[J]. ALA Bulletin, 1952, 46(2):48-49.
[8] American Library Association. Proposed standards for accreditation[J]. American Libraries, 1972, 3(6):653-657.
[9] American Library Association. Standards for accreditation of master's programs in library and information studies 1992[EB/OL].[2013-11-13]. http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/standards/standards.
[10] American Library Association. Standards for accreditation of master's programs in library & information studies 2008[EB/OL].[2013-11-13]. http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/sites/ala.org.accreditedprograms/files/content/standards/standards_2008.pdf
[11] 初景利.国外图书馆学情报学教育新发展与新特点(下)[J].图书馆论坛, 2008, 28(1):17-21.
[12] The ALA Committee on Accreditation. Accreditation process policies & procedures[EB/OL].[2013-11-13]. http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/sites/ala.org.accreditedprograms/files/content/AP3_all_sections_with_TOC.pdf.
[13] 黄宗忠.美国图书馆学情报学教育的发展[J].大学图书馆通讯, 1983(5):20-25.
[14] 林淑芬.美国图书馆专业教育发展小史[J].国立"中央"图书馆馆刊, 1986, 19(2):133-151.
[15] 柯平, 李键.我国图书馆学教育的发展思考[J].现代情报, 2011, 31(7):3-8.
[16] 赖茂生.情报学教育的现在和发展.情报理论与实践[J], 2003, 26(1):80-84, 88.
[17] 肖希明, 卢娅.论图书馆学情报学教育的整合[J].图书情报工作, 2009, 53(5):7-10.
[18] 肖希明, 司莉, 黄如花.我国图书馆学教育发展现状的调查分析[J].图书情报知识, 2008(1):5-10, 16.
[19] 陈传夫, 吴钢, 盛钊, 等.新中国图书情报学教育历程与展望[J].图书馆杂志, 2009, 28(8):3-11.
[20] 肖希明, 黄如花, 司莉.我国图书馆学专业教育与职业需求的调查与分析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2008(3): 11-16.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
