Library and Information Service >
Research Framework of Integration and Services of Digital Archival Resources in China under the Digital Transition Environment
Received date: 2013-10-16
Revised date: 2013-12-09
Online published: 2013-12-20
Facing grand challenges of digital transition, to take the problems of current research into consideration in terms of lack of top-level design for integration and services of digital archival resources from multi-disciplinary perspectives, multi-dimensional relationships, multiple levels of connections and multiple aspects of consistency, a research framework is formulated. The research framework includes theoretical framework building, collaborative innovation mechanism building, cyber infrastructure implementing, performance assessment and the continuing improvement program developing. It aims to to solve the problems of adaptability, complexity, uncertainty and sustainability issues of integration and services of archival resources during digital transition, and improve the overall capacity of national informatization and its sustainable development.
An Xiaomi , Bai Wenlin , Zhong Wenrui , Sun Shuyang . Research Framework of Integration and Services of Digital Archival Resources in China under the Digital Transition Environment[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(24) : 44 -50,78 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.24.006
[1] Digital transition policy[EB/OL].[2013-10-10]. http://www.naa.gov.au/records-management/digital-transition-policy/.
[2] Managing government records directive[EB/OL].[2013-10-10]. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2012/m-12-18.pdf.
[3] Marty P F.An introduction to digital convergence:Libraries, archives, and museums in the information age[J].Museum Management and Curatorship, 2009, 24(4): 295-298.
[4] Smith-Yoshimura K. Social metadata for libraries, archives, and museums[EB/OL].[2013-08-22]. http://www.wip.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2012/2012-02.pdf.
[5] Flinn A, Stevens M, Shepherd E.Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream[J].Archival Science, 2009, 9(1-2): 71-86.
[6] Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E.New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector:From handing over to handing on[J].International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2010, 16(1-2): 59-76.
[7] Macgregor G, McCulloch E.Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool[J].Library Review, 2006, 55(5): 291-300.
[8] Krause M G, Yakel E.Interaction in virtual archives:The polar bear expedition digital collections next generation finding aid[J].American Archivist, 2007, 70(2): 282-314.
[9] Huvila I.Participatory archive:Towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management[J].Archival Science, 2008, 8(1): 15-36.
[10] Samouelian M.Embracing Web 2.0: Archives and the newest generation of Web applications[J].American Archivist, 2009, 72(1): 42-71.
[11] Rydz M.Participatory archiving:Exploring a collaborative approach to Aboriginal societal provenance[D].Manitoba:University of Winnipeg, 2010.
[12] Prom C J.Using Web analytics to improve online access to archival resources[J].American Archivist, 2011, 74(1):158-184.
[13] Newman J. Revisiting archive collections:Developing models for participatory cataloguing[J].Journal of the Society of Archivists, 2012, 33(1): 57-73.
[14] Duranti L.From digital diplomatics to digital records forensics[J]. Archivaria, 2009, 68(fall):39-66.
[15] Xie L.Building foundations for digital records forensics: A comparative study of the concept of reproduction in digital records management and digital forensics[J].American Archivist, 2011, 74(2):576-599.
[16] Lakhani A.Social networking sites and the legal profession: Balancing benefits with navigating minefields[J].Computer Law & Security Review, 2013, 29(2): 164-174.
[17] Kretzschmar R.Archival processing of born digital material and digitization of archival documents in Germany[R].Brisbane: ICA Congress, 2012.
[18] Vlatka L.Building of integrated national archival network in Croatia:Connecting administration, archives and public in practice[EB/OL].[2013-08-19]. http://www.ica2012.com/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00019.pdf.
[19] Digital continuity action plan[EB/OL].[2013-10-11]. http://epsiplatform.eu/content/new-zealand-digital-continuity-action-plan-august-2009.
[20] Digital continuity plan[EB/OL].[2013-10-11]. http://www.naa.gov.au/records-management/agency/digital/digital-continuity/plan/index.aspx.
[21] Hofman H.Recordkeeping implementation issues in the Netherlands[R].Sydney: Information Awareness Seminar, 2011.
[22] Hofman H.Rethinking the archival function in the digital era[R].Brisbane: ICA Congress, 2012.
[23] 郑燃, 李晶.我国图书馆、档案馆与博物馆数字资源整合研究进展[J].情报资料工作, 2012(3):69-71.
[24] 郑燃, 唐义, 戴艳清.基于关联数据的图书馆、档案馆和博物馆数字资源整合研究[J].图书与情报, 2012(1):71-76.
[25] 何振, 蒋冠.试论电子政务环境下档案资源整合与共享的实现形式[J].档案学研究, 2004(4):40-43.
[26] 何振, 蒋冠.国家档案资源整合与共享工程建设构想[J].档案学研究, 2005(4):32-36.
[27] 向立文.档案资源整合与共享的实现条件研究[J].情报杂志, 2006(12):135-136, 139.
[28] 倪丽娟.档案信息资源的整合与信息化[J].中国档案, 2005(12):26-27.
[29] 李宝玲.我国档案资源整合研究现状分析[J].档案学研究, 2010(2):31-33.
[30] 曹航, 杨智勇.档案资源整合:现状、困难与推进策略[J].档案学研究, 2010(4):28-31.
[31] 吴艺博.我国档案信息资源整合实践探索行为研究[J].档案学研究, 2012(4):41-45.
[32] 蒋冠.网络环境下档案信息资源整合研究[D].湘潭:湘潭大学, 2005.
[33] 张东华.网络环境下档案信息资源整合探讨[J].档案学通讯, 2005(3):74-77.
[34] 吴建华, 方燕平.档案网站信息资源及其整合概念的界定——"档案网站信息资源普查与整合研究"系列论文之一[J].档案学通讯, 2009(5):52-55.
[35] 王斌, 吴建华.档案网站信息资源整合方法与方案——"档案网站信息资源普查与整合研究"系列论文之二[J].档案学通讯, 2010(1):61-66.
[36] 戴志强.国家档案资源整合的涵义及其运作机制探讨[J].档案学通讯, 2003(2):4-7.
[37] 戴志强.以公共档案馆为主体整合共享性档案信息资源的思考[J].档案学研究, 2010(1):32-36.
[38] 谢兰玉.数字档案资源建设背景下信息化标准体系的建构[J].湖北档案, 2013(1):18-21.
[39] 谭必勇, 王新才.国家档案资源整合与共享的控制机制探讨[J].档案学研究, 2006(4):17-22.
[40] 裴友泉, 马仁杰, 裴斐.徽式探索的学术意义——社会转型期档案资源整合问题研究[J].档案学通讯, 2006(4):14-17.
[41] 杨润珍, 傅电仁.国有档案资源整合机制与形式[J].北京档案, 2009(6):26-27.
[42] 杨润珍.认识国有档案资源属性 创新档案资源整合机制[J].档案时空, 2009(4):17-19.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
