Indexes of innovation potentiality would be added in research evaluation system for encouraging to product more innovation achievements. The paper theoretically elaborated structural holes and brokerage roles that based on network structure are applicable in measuring the innovation potentiality of evaluation objects. Taking economics authors as an example, empirical study proved the practicality of constraint index and brokerage roles index as the indexes of innovation potentiality. Through theoretical inquiry and empirical study, the paper summarized the indexes' characteristics, relation and using way, considered that they can measure the innovation potentiality of discipline, authors, institutions and etc. And the two indexes should be matched usage for reaching comprehensive evaluation.
Song Ge
. Study on Indexes of Innovation Potentiality from the Perspective of Network Structure[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014
, 58(03)
: 64
-71
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.03.010
[1] Rafols I, Leydesdorff L, O'Hare A, et al. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management[J].Research Policy, 2012(7): 1262-1282.
[2] 钱玲飞, 杨建林, 邓三鸿.人文社会科学学科创新力单指标评价[J].图书与情报, 2013(2):93-98.
[3] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties[J].American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78 (May): 1360-1380.
[4] Lin Nan. Social networks and status attainment[J].Annual Review of Sociology, 1999, 25: 467-487.
[5] Burt R S. Structural holes and good ideas[J].American Journal of Sociology, 2004(2): 349-399.
[6] Gould R V, Fernandez R M. Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks[M].San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989: 89-126.
[7] Burt R S. Social capital, structural holes and the entrepreneur[J]. Revve Francaise de Sociologie, 1995(4): 599-&.
[8] Pflueger J C. A design method for cross-disciplinary coordination and innovation[D]. Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991.
[9] Newman M E J.The structure and function of complex network[J].SLAM Review, 2003, 45(2):167-256.
[10] Burt R S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition[M]. Harvard:Harvard University Press, 1992.
[11] 肖宇峰. 专利权人引用网络中的媒介角色研究[J].现代图书情报技术, 2011(11):60-66.
[12] 罗纳德·伯特.结构洞——竞争的社会结构[M].上海:格致出版社, 2008:65.
[13] 宋歌. 社会网络分析在引文评价中的应用研究[J].图书情报工作, 2010, 54(14):16-19, 115.
[14] de Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V. Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded second edition[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011:162.
[15] 戴安娜·克兰. 无形学院——知识在科学共同体的扩散[M].刘珺珺, 顾昕, 王德禄, 译.北京:华夏出版社, 1988:101.
[16] Freeman L C. Centered graphs and the structure of ego networks[J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 1982(3): 291-304.
[17] 宋歌.网络分析方法在引文分析中的整合研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2011(4):106-114.
[18] 汪丹. 结构洞理论在情报分析中的应用与展望[J]. 情报杂志, 2009(1):183-186.
