The identification methods of academic patents in an institution are based on the name matching. The identification process in the association of patents and paper is of great significance theoretically and practically. This paper summarizes the current research development of academic patent identification methods, including searching for keywords, matching list and relational database. Through the advantage and disadvantage, we present the identification steps of academic patents in an institution. Therefore, combined the strengths of keywords and matching list, the relational database have been successfully practiced in German University with the help of updating name list on a large scale, which provides a lesson for other countries' academic patents research.
Li Shuying
,
Fang Shu
. The Research Development of the Identification Method of Academic Patent in an Institution[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014
, 58(03)
: 124
-129
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.03.020
[1] 傅正华.Bayh-Dole法案出台的背景及启示[J].科技进步与对策, 2009, 26(3):32-35.
[2] Raffo J, Lhuillery S. How to play the "Names Game": Patent retrieval comparing different heuristics[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38:1617-1627.
[3] Meyer M. Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness[J]. Research Evaluation, 2003, 12(1): 17-27.
[4] Geuna A, Nesta L J J. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(6):790-807.
[5] OECD. Patent statistics manual[EB/OL].[2013-10-06]. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9209021e.pdf?expires=1378023015&id=id&accname=ocid56017385&checksu m=BE8829D28190A307CF761C9B981A030C.
[6] Trajtenberg M, Shiff G, Melamed R. The‘Names Game’: Harnessing inventors' patent data for economic research[EB/OL].[2013-10-11]. http://www.albany.edu/~marschke/Workshop/NSFNamesGame.pdf.
[7] Czarnitzki D, Glänzel W, Hussinger K. Patent and publication activities of German professors: An empirical assessment of their co-activity[J]. Research Evaluation, 2007, 16(4):311-319.
[8] Czarnitzki D, Hussinger H, Schneidery C. Commercializing academic research: The quality of faculty patenting[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2011, 20(5):1403-1437.
[9] KEINS. Knowledge-based entrepreneurship: Innovation, networks and systems[EB/OL].[2013-10-14]. http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy-briefs-keins-laurila_en.pdf.
[10] Thursby J, Fuller A W, Thurby M. US faculty patenting: Inside and outside the university[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(1):14-25.
[11] 王刚波, 官建成. 纳米科学与技术之间的联系:基于学术型发明人的分析[J].中国软科学, 2009(12):71-79.
[12] Dornbusch F, Schmoch U, Schulze N, et al. Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach[C] //Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No.32. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI, 2012.
