Library and Information Service >
Confucism in General Catalog of Si Ku Quan Shu：Based on the Comparision of Its Summary and Sub-Code
Received date: 2014-01-06
Revised date: 2014-01-13
Online published: 2014-02-05
The academic debate on Sinology and Neo-Confucianism in Song Dynasty is not only one of the biggest contentious issues in Chinese ideological history, but also a hot topic in the academic circle of the Qing Dynasty. Many scholars in the early Qing Dynasty were involved in the discussion. General Catalog of Si Ku Quan Shu, which was compiled in Qianlong period, precisely reflects the academic trend and status of the academic development in Qing Dynasty and puts forward the two famous groups of Sinology and Neo-Confucianism in Han and Song Dynasty which embodies the tendency of attaching more importance to Sinology than to Neo-Confucianism in Song Dynasty. The academic attitude and tendency run as an ideological line through the academic criticism of General Catalog of Si Ku Quan Shu, and becomes the spiritual essence of General Catalog of Si Ku Quan Shu.
Zhao Tao . Confucism in General Catalog of Si Ku Quan Shu：Based on the Comparision of Its Summary and Sub-Code[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014 , 58(03) : 140 -145 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.03.023
[1] 钱穆.中国学术思想史论丛(第八册)[M].北京:九州出版社, 2011.
[2] 黄爱平.四库全书纂修研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社, 1989.
[3] 司马朝军.《四库全书总目》编纂考[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2005.
[4] 刘汉屏.略论《四库提要》与四库分纂稿的异同和清代汉宋学之争[J].历史教学, 1979(7):40-44.
[5] 罗琳.《四库全书》的"分纂提要"和"原本提要"[J].图书情报工作, 1987(1):37-40.
[6] 永瑢.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局, 1965.
[7] 江藩.汉学师承记[M].北京:三联书店, 1998.
[8] 翁方纲.翁方纲纂四库提要稿[M].上海:上海科学技术文献出版社, 2000.
[9] 戴震.戴震全集[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 1991.
[10] 章学诚.文史通义[M].北京:中华书局, 1985.
[11] 姚鼐.惜抱轩书录[M].桐城:徐宗亮清光绪五年刻本(1889).
[12] 皮锡瑞.经学通论[M].北京:中华书局, 1954.
[13] 朱熹.朱熹集[M].成都:四川教育出版社, 1996.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
