Library and Information Service >
Comparison of Legal Norms of Government Information Quality in China and United States
Received date: 2014-01-11
Revised date: 2014-03-01
Online published: 2014-03-20
Legal norms of government information quality in China and United States are compared in legal definition, review mechanism, enforcement system, and enforcement effectiveness. It proposes the suggestion that China should establish and improve the government information quality law which includes increasing a clear definition of government information quality standards, specifying existing legal norms of government information quality, developing the Information Quality Act, improving social appraisals, specifying specialized agencies to regularly assess the quality of government information,and improving government officials' information quality awareness.
Xiang Liling , Song Lu . Comparison of Legal Norms of Government Information Quality in China and United States[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014 , 58(06) : 54 -57 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.06.009
[1] 高志勇,高建民,王侃昌,等.基于信息结构要素的信息质量定义与内涵分析[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(10):1724-1728.
[2] Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity,utility, and integrity of information disseminated by federal agencies[EB/OL].[2014-02-09].http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_final_information_quality_guidelines/.
[3] Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554)Sec. 515[EB/OL].[2014-02-09].http://www.fws.gov/informationquality/section515.html.
[4] 张建彬.政府信息公开的信息质量研究[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(11):29-33.
[5] 宋立荣,彭洁.美国政府"信息质量法"的介绍及其启示[J].情报杂志,2012,31(2):12-18.
[6] United States Government Accountability Office. Report to Congressional requesters, expanded oversight and clearer guidance by the office of management and budget could improve agencies' implementation of the Act[EB/OL].[2014-02-09].http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fra.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
