Library and Information Service >
Path Selection of Open Access in China：Context Misunderstanding and Empirical Evidences
Received date: 2014-03-27
Revised date: 2014-04-06
Online published: 2014-04-20
It is seen as necessary to consider contexts when choosing the path of open access. A context analysis framework of open access development is established and three special contexts different from other countries are analyzed. Related literatures about China's open access development policy, strategy and action plan are collected to determine how the context it works. The results show that, little context is observed while the important effect is missing even if context leads to three misunderstandings. By clarifying these misunderstandings and taking fully consideration of contexts above, this research puts forewords a hybrid path, which composes of a priority of central open access repository-based subpath with an open access journal-based subpath.
Key words： open access; path selection; context; institutional repository
Zhang Yaokun , Xia Nanqiang , Zhao Xiaochao . Path Selection of Open Access in China：Context Misunderstanding and Empirical Evidences[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014 , 58(08) : 23 -29 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.08.004
[1] 陈传夫. 信息资源公共获取的社会价值与国际研究动向[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2006(4): 5-9.
[2] 王乐. 开放获取,中国学界为何态度暧昧[N]. 文汇报, 2010-11-12(9).
[3] Björk B. A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system[J/OL]. Information Research, 2007, 12(2)[2014-03-12]. http://www.informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper307.html.
[4] Søndergaard T F, Andersen J, Hjørland B. Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information:Revising and updating the UNISIST model[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2003, 59(3): 278-320.
[5] Warlick S E, Vaughan K T L. Factors influencing publication choice:Why faculty choose open access[J/OL].[2014-03-12].http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/4/1/1.
[6] 李武, 董伟. 国内开放存取的研究热点: 基于共词分析的文献计量研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011(6): 105-115.
[7] 段玉思. 国外学术期刊商业化出版竞争格局演进分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2007(6): 981-983.
[8] 中国科学技术协会. 中国科协科技期刊发展报告(2012)[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社,2012.
[9] 潘云涛, 武夷山. 换个角度看中国科技期刊出版体制改革[J]. 科学学研究, 2011(12): 1770-1772.
[10] 张晓林. 研究图书馆 2020: 嵌入式协作化知识实验室?[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012 (1): 11-20.
[11] 王波,吴汉华,姚晓霞,等. 2012 年高校图书馆发展报告[EB/OL]. [2014-03-12]. http://www.scal.edu.cn/sites/default/files/attachment/tjpg/2012fazhanbaogao.pdf.
[12] 张国. 高校图书馆都在为钱发愁[N]. 中国青年报,2012-11-01(3).
[13] 刘向, 马费成. 科学知识网络的演化与动力——基于科学引证网络的分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2012(1): 87-94.
[14] 赵晓霞. 科研论文为何热衷国外首发？[N]. 人民日报海外版, 2013-07-06(8).
[15] 雷宇. 优秀论文外流拷问科研评价机制[N]. 中国青年报, 2011-04-08(1).
[16] 赵蕴华, 姚长青, 郑佳. 国际上主要国家开放存取政策及对我国的启示[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2009 (11): 28-31.
[17] 陈振英, 何小军, 陈益君. 开放存取在中国的困境及对策分析[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2008(2): 35-40.
[18] 程维红,任胜利,王应宽,等. 中国科协科技期刊开放存取出版现状[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2008(4): 554-560.
[19] 陈铭,叶继元. 中文文科期刊开放存取现况的统计与分析——以 “中文社会科学引文索引”(CSSCI) 来源期刊为例[J]. 图书情报知识, 2013 (3): 28-35.
[20] Craig I D, Plume A M, McVeigh M E, et al. Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1(3): 239-248.
[21] 张巧娜. 我国大陆机构库实践的“冷现象”研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2010(6): 48-52.
[22] 黄纯一. 开放存取:让知识从垄断中突围 [N]. 文汇报, 2014-01-14(1).
[23] Research Council UK. RCUK policy on open access and supporting guidance[EB/OL]. [2014-03-12]. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf.
[24] The Business, Innovation and Skills Committee. Open access: Fifth report of session 2013-14[EB/OL].[2014-03-12]. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmbis/99/99.pdf.
[25] Executive Office of the President National Science and Technology Council. Interagency public access coordination:A report to Congress on the coordination of policies related to the dissemination and long-term stewardship of the results of federally funded scientific research[EB/OL]. [2014-03-12]. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/public_access-final.pdf.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
