Library and Information Service >
An Empirical Research in Chinese Information Science Philosophy Theory based on Delphi Method
Received date: 2014-04-21
Revised date: 2014-05-13
Online published: 2014-06-05
This study got the information science philosophy theory using delphi method, which involving 23 Chinese professors in this research fields. Study results are as follow: Firstly, the cognition of experts in information science philosophy theory has low consistency, which has 12 different views. Secondly, most experts recommend the philosophical foundation of information science should consist of not only a kind of philosophical theory, but coexist by a variety of philosophical theory, where the split lies is on which philosophy theory should coexist. Thirdly, popper's theory of three worlds, hermeneutics and the philosophy of information can be used to guide information science research of multiple dimensions. Empiricism, rationalism, positivism, pragmatism and constructivism can be used to guide information science methodology. Humanism and cognitive theory can be used to guide information user study. This study can provide guidance for building the framework of information science philosophy theory.
Key words: information science; delphi method; philosophy
Han Zhengbiao , Zhou Peng . An Empirical Research in Chinese Information Science Philosophy Theory based on Delphi Method[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014 , 58(11) : 89 -96 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.11.014
[1] Brookes B C.The foundations of information science.Part I: Philosophical aspects[J].Journal of Information Science,1980,2(3):125-133.
[2] Hjørland B. Library and information science: Practice, theory, and philosophical basis[J].Information Processing and Management, 2000, 36(3):501-531.
[3] 韩正彪.当代北美情报学理论近20年研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(5):131-140.
[4] Vickery B, Metatheory and information science[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1997, 53(5):457-476.
[5] Hjørland B. Theory and metatheory of information science: A new interpretation[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1998, 54(5):606-621.
[6] Bonnevie E.Dretske's semantic information theory and meta-theories in library and information science[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2001, 57(4):519-534.
[7] Hjørland B.Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2002, 53(4):257-270.
[8] Fallis D. Introduction social epistemology and information science[J].Social Epistemology, 2002, 16(1):1-4.
[9] Floridi L.On defining library and information science as applied philosophy of information[J].Social Epistemology, 2002, 16(1):37-49.
[10] Hjørland B.Arguments for philosophical realism in library and information science[J].Library Trends, 2004, 52(3):488-506.
[11] Hjørland B. Empiricism, rationalism and positivism in library and information science[J].Journal of Documentation, 2005, 61(1):130-155.
[12] Sundin O, Johannisson J.Pragmatism, neo-pragmatism and sociocultural theory-Communicative participation as a perspective in LIS[J]. Journal of Documentation,2005, 61(1):23-43.
[13] Talja S, Finland T, Savolainen R. "Isms" in information science: Constructivism, collectivism and constructionism[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2005, 61(1):79-101.
[14] Wikgren M. Critical realism as a philosophy and social theory in information science?[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2005, 61(1):11-22.
[15] Day R E.Poststructuralism and information studies[J].Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2005, 39(1):575-609.
[16] Radford G P, Radford M L.Structuralism, post-structuralism, and the library de Saussure and Foucault[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2005, 61(1):60-78.
[17] Hansson J.Hermeneutics as a bridge between the modern and the postmodern in library and information science[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2005, 61(1):102-113.
[18] Hjørland B.Library and information science and the philosophy of science[J]. Journal of Documentation,2005, 61(1):5-10.
[19] Budd J M.Phenomenology and information studies[J]. Journal of Documentation,2005, 61(1):44-59.
[20] Wilson T D.Activity theory and information seeking[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2009, 42(1):119-161.
[21] Jones B.Reductionism and library and information science philosophy[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2008, 64(4):482-495.
[22] Fonseca F. The double role of ontologies in information science research[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(6):786-793.
[23] Kari J.A review of the spiritual in information studies[J].Journal of Documentation, 2007, 63(6):935-962.
[24] Semenyuk E P.Information science and spiritual values globalization[J].Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 2008, 35(1):1-11.
[25] Ford N.Creativity and convergence in information science research the roles of objectivity and subjectivity, constraint, and control[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2004, 53(13):1169-1182.
[26] Hjørland B.Information: Objective or subjective/situational?[J] Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(10):1448-1456.
[27] Hjørland B.Concept theory[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(8):1519-1536.
[28] Holland G A. Associating social constructionism and extended cognition in information studies[J].Journal of Documentation, 2006, 62(1):91-100.
[29] 靳娟娟. 情报学哲学基础研究[J].图书情报工作,1995(3):7-10.
[30] 朱奎华."三个世界"与"矛盾说"对情报学哲学基础的探讨[J].现代情报,1995 (8):1-3.
[31] 刘植惠.试论情报学的哲学基础[J].情报学报,1989, 8(3):161-167.
[32] 秦铁辉.波普尔的世界理论与情报学的哲学基础[J].情报学报,1991, 10(2):136.
[33] 佘诗武.军事哲学与军事情报学[J].情报杂志,2002(2):21-22.
[34] 曹文娟,赖茂生.信息哲学研究综述[J].情报理论与实践,2004,27(3):331-333.
[35] 陈忆金.现代情报学的理论基础——信息哲学[J].图书情报工作,2005, 49(8):55-58,62.
[36] 王芳.情报学的范式变迁及元理论研究[J].情报学报,2007, 26(5):764-773.
[37] 王知津,宋正凯.论情报学发展的后现代主义趋势[J].情报理论与实践,2007, 30(2):145-148.
[38] 王知津,韩正彪,周鹏.当代情报学理论思潮:经验主义、理性主义与实证主义[J].情报科学,2011, 29(12):1761-1766,1772.
[39] 王知津,韩正彪,周鹏.活动理论视角下的情报学研究及转向模型[J].图书情报知识,2012(1):5-13.
[40] 韩正彪,景璟,马婧.情报学哲学问题及情报学理论构建:研究主体视角[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(12):32-37,129.
/
〈 | 〉 |