Research on Transformative Path around Information Management Disciplines Integration

Tao Jun; Wang Chuanqing

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.14.006

Library and Information Service >

2014 , Vol. 58 >Issue 14: 41 - 48

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.14.006

Research on Transformative Path around Information Management Disciplines Integration

Tao Jun ,
Wang Chuanqing

Expand

1. School of Public Management, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127;
2. National Science Library , Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
3. School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022

Received date: 2014-05-19

Revised date: 2014-06-27

Online published: 2014-07-20

Fold

Abstract

Beginning with a brief review with controversy on the transformation of the discipline integration of library, information and archives management (LIA) from 1978,the paper illustrates the underlying causes about conversion with disciplines orientation from professional to academic education. Then it develops a transformative model of four indicators which include academic(A),core fields(C),scale(S) and open(O) discipline, and demonstrates the key factors which limit the development of disciplines. What's more, it presents the research scope and theory framework as information management (IM) of academic education, and constructs a hierarchical model between IM and LIA. Suggestions are given including creating academic society to promote the integration of academic exchange environment, substituting the name of public information management to promote the integration of library science & archives, adding master of information officer to expand career covering and public responsibility, enhancing the proportion of middle and upper-disciplinary theoretical courses in the curriculum structure.

Key words： information management; discipline integration; ACSO model; academic education; public information management

Cite this article

Tao Jun , Wang Chuanqing . Research on Transformative Path around Information Management Disciplines Integration[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014 , 58(14) : 41 -48 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.14.006

References

[1] 陶俊. 信息管理一级学科的变革路径研究[J].图书情报工作,2013, 57(9):5-12.

[2] Buckland M. What kind of science can information science be?[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012, 63(1):1-7.

[3] Cronin B. The waxing and waning of a field:Reflections on information studies education[J/OL].Information Research,2012, 17(3).[2014-02-10].http://InformationR.net/ir/17-3/paper529.html.http://InformationR.net/ir/17-3/paper529.html.

[4] 万良春. 试论科技图书馆的情报职能与图书情报一体化——兼评《对图书情报一体化问题》的质疑[J].图书情报工作,1982,26(1):1-5.

[5] 张晓林. 应该转变图书馆研究的方向[J].图书馆学通讯,1985(3):57-64.

[6] 万良春. 确立"文献信息"概念建立"文献信息学"[J].图书情报知识,1986(1):7-14.

[7] 黄宗忠. 试论图书情报档案一体化的发展趋势[J].武汉大学学报(社会科学版),1986(6):89-96.

[8] 侯经川. 关于《普通高等学校本科专业目录》信息管理学科部分的修订建议[J].情报理论与实践,2010(9):1-3.

[9] 孟广均. 关于学科建设和名称设置之我见[J].图书情报工作,1996,40(3):3-4.

[10] 孟广均. 重视发展二级学科科学定名一级学科——再论本学科建设问题[J].图书情报工作,2000,44(12):7-10.

[11] 程焕文. 高涨的事业与低落的教育——关于图书馆学教育逆向发展的思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2001(1):67-70.

[12] 荀昌荣. 论图书馆学档案学专业人才培养整合模式[J].中国图书馆学报,2001(1):71-73.

[13] 傅敏,刘兹恒,王子舟. 图书馆人才需求与图书馆学教育[J].图书情报工作,2003,47(3):18-22.

[14] 王知津. 我国图书馆学教育面临新的转折和选择[J].图书情报工作,2003,47(3):10-15,56.

[15] 沙勇忠. 迈向数字时代的图书馆学教育:在规范中寻求发展——教育部高校图书馆学学科教指委2008年工作会议暨系主任联席会议观察[J].中国图书馆学报,2009(1):71-75.

[16] 肖希明,唐义. 图书馆学博物馆学档案学课程体系整合初探[J].中国图书馆学报,2014(3):4-12.

[17] 苏新宁. 提升图书情报学学科地位的思考——基于CSSCI的实证分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2010(4):47-53.

[18] 杨文祥. 21世纪图书馆事业与图书馆学研究的几个问题[J].中国图书馆学报,2001(1):11-16.

[19] 马费成. 规范学科名称促进学科发展[J].图书情报工作,1996,40(3):8-10.

[20] 范并思. 论图书馆学专业教育的改革[J].图书情报工作,1998,42(11):50-53.

[21] 李刚,孙建军. 从边缘到中心:信息管理研究的学科范型嬗变[J].中国图书馆学报,2008(5):5-13.

[22] 周九常. 2011年教育部高等学校图书馆学教学指导委员会第五次工作会议暨专业主任联席会议述评[J].图书馆工作与研究,2012(10):4-8.

[23] 陈传夫,吴钢,唐琼, 等. 改革开放三十年我国图书情报学教育的发展[J].图书情报知识,2008(5):5-14.

[24] 于良芝. 图书馆学教育呼唤战略思维[J].图书与情报,2006(4):26-33.

[25] Vanhouse N A,Sutton S A. The panda syndrome:An ecology of LIS education[J].Journal of Education for Library and Information Science,1996, 37(2):131-147.

[26] 刘军. 管理研究方法:原理与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:63-69.

[27] 陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立. 组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].2版.北京:北京大学出版社,2012:68.

[28] Theodoridis S,Koutroumbas K.模式识别[M]. 李晶皎,王爱侠,王骄,译.北京:电子工业出版社, 2010:1.

[29] Waldo D. Scope of the theory of public administration[C]//Theory and Practice of Public Administration. Philadelphia:American Academy of Political and Social Science,1968:5.

[30] Hawkins D T,Larson S E,Caton B Q. Information science abstracts:Tracking the literature of information science.Part 2:A new taxonomy for information science[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2003, 54(8):771-783.

[31] 陈传夫,王云娣. 中美图书馆学借用知识的比较观察——基于十年引文的分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2010(6):20-27.

[32] 普通高等学校本科专业目录(1998年颁布)[EB/OL]. [2014-05-30].http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s3882/201010/xxgk_109699.html.

[33] 阳光高考.[EB/OL].[2014-02-10]. http://gaokao.chsi.com.cn/.

[34] Aparac-Jelusic T, Ibekwe-SanJuan F, Huvila I, et al. Crossing the boundaries in information science:Perspectives on interdisciplinarity[EB/OL].[2014-02-20].http://www.asis.org/asist2013/proceedings/submissions/panels/17panel.pdf.

[35] Library M P. IFLA metropolitan libraries survey[R/OL].[2014-05-22].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/metropolitan-libraries/publications/annual-statistics/annual-statistics_2010/libraries-in-changing-times-2010_2012-05-22.pdf.

[36] 陶俊,孙坦,金瑛. 总分馆制下公共图书馆的服务模式研究——以美国波士顿公共图书馆为例[J].图书馆建设,2010(8):7-13.

[37] Hjrland B. Theory and metatheory of information science:A new interpretation[J].Journal of Documentation,1998, 54(5):606-621.

[38] Bates M J. An operational definition of the information disciplines[EB/OL].[2014-02-20].http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/pdf/Contribution512-1.pdf.

[39] 张维迎. 市场的逻辑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2012:135-155.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References