Study of Evaluation Index of Patent Industrialization Potential between Domestic and Foreign Patents

  • Zhu Yuexian ,
  • Zhang Xian ,
  • Li Shuying ,
  • Xu Yi ,
  • Xu Haiyun
Expand
  • 1. Chengdu Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2014-10-09

  Revised date: 2014-12-21

  Online published: 2015-01-05

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] At present, whether some patent evaluation indicators can be used to evaluate the potential for industrialization is still controversial. This paper checks the efficiency of the chosen reasonable evaluation indicators, especially analyses the feature of Chinese patents, and compares the differences of evaluation indicators of industrialization potential between domestic and foreign patents.[Method/process] Based on a comprehensive literature reviews of worldwide research work, this paper proposes evaluation indicators of patent industrialization potential from three value modalities including technique, legal rights and market, and the efficiency of the evaluation indicators are tested by quantitative methods, such as independent-samples T test using SPSS.[Result/conclusion] Chooses patents bought by patent trolls as samples of foreign patents, Chinese transferred or licensed patents as samples of domestic patents. For these proposed indicators, the verification result is: there is a big difference at evaluation indicators of industrialization potential between domestic and foreign patents.Through the empirical study, there are some evaluation indicators can be used to value industrialization potential for foreign patents, including relative citation frequency, number of non-patent reference, number of IPC Classification, number of claims, patent family size, patent age, "whether renew at the 8th year after patent grant"; some evaluation indicators can be used to value industrialization potential for domestic patents, including patent type, "whether renew at the 5th year after patent grant".

Cite this article

Zhu Yuexian , Zhang Xian , Li Shuying , Xu Yi , Xu Haiyun . Study of Evaluation Index of Patent Industrialization Potential between Domestic and Foreign Patents[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(1) : 127 -133 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.01.017

References

[1] 黄洪波, 宋河发, 曲婉.专利产业化及其评价指标体系与测度方法研究[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(15):110-114.
[2] 冯昌扬.国内外技术研究文献综述:2003-2012年[J].知识管理论坛,2013,64(3):52-63.
[3] Pantros IP. Patent Factor Index Report[EB/OL].[2013-10-10]. http://ip.com/ip-analytics/patent-factor-index-report/.
[4] Sohn So Young, Moon Tae Hee. Structural equation model for predicting techno logy commercialization success index(TCSI)[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Chang e, 2003,70(9):885-899.
[5] Harhoff D, Scherer F M, Vopel K.Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights[J]. Research Policy,2003,32(8):1343-1363.
[6] Li Yung-Ta, Huang Mu-Hsuan, Chen Dar-Zen. Positioning and shifting of technology focus for integrated device manufacturers by patent perspectives[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2014,81:363-375.
[7] 专利产业化推进问题研究子课题组.专利产业化推进问题研究[EB/OL].[2013-10-10].http://www.sipo.gov.cn/ztzl/ywzt/qgzlsyfzzltjgz/reserchps/201311/t20131113_879458.html.
[8] 唐宝莲,潘卫.发明专利产业化筛选评价指标体系研究[J].情报杂志,2003(1):27-30.
[9] 马慧民,张爽,叶春明.专利技术产业化筛选评估指标体系研究[J].中国科技论坛,2005(5):65-68.
[10] 韩金柱.专利价值在技术生命周期中的分布及其决定因素分析[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2008.
[11] 叶春明,齐静. 基于多元线性回归模型的专利技术产业化评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2010(21):54-58.
[12] Hall B H, Jaffe A B,Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools[EB/OL].[2013-10-10].http://users.nber.org/~edegan/w/images/0/03/Hall_Jaffe_Tratjenberg_(2000)_-_The_NBER_Patent_Citations_Data_File.pdf.
[13] Lerner J. The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis[J]. RAND Journal ofEconomics, 1994,25(2): 319-333.
[14] Barney J. Comparative patent quality analysis: A statistical approach for rating and valuing patents[EB/OL].[2013-10-10].www.patentratings.com.
[15] 万小丽.专利质量指标研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2009.
[16] Hirschey M, Richardson V J. Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors? [J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2004,11(1):91-107
[17] Fischer T, Henkel J. Patent trolls on markets for technology- An empirical analysis of NPEs' patent acquisitions[J]. Research Policy, 2012,41(9):1519-1553.

Outlines

/

〈 〉