Library and Information Service >
Research on Barriers of Education Resources Disclosure Based on Researchers' Attitudes: Taking Courseware Resources as Example
Received date: 2014-11-28
Revised date: 2015-01-06
Online published: 2015-01-20
[Purpose/significance] The paper takes courseware among education resources as research content and analyzes researchers' cognitive situation about barrier factors of courseware disclosure in commercial purposes use, damage of Intellectual Property, loss of academic advantage position, affection of students' study behaviors, controversy of academic norm, etc. [Method/process] The paper makes surveys on researchers by questionnaires, sending out 1600 questionnaires to 32 provinces and cities in China; also interviews 12 teachers of Wuhan University during March to April in 2011. [Result/conclusion] Three barrier factors are the most worrying: improper use by others, commercial purposes use, damage of content integrity; the less worrying factors are inconvenience of content disclosure and affection of students' learning behavior, loss of academic advantage position, controversy of academic norm; the least worry factor is how to disclose the courseware. The age, gender, identity and title of researchers have a certain relationship with their cognitive. Results have certain reliability on the basis of a large number of sample surveys. For the sake of free flow, sharing and accessibility of network academic information resources, for example, protecting courseware's copyright to keep balance of public interests, strengthening the academic ethnic construction, establishing the courseware disclosure and academic communication platform, and providing the inspection and drive mechanism for the guarantee of the researchers.
Chen Peng . Research on Barriers of Education Resources Disclosure Based on Researchers' Attitudes: Taking Courseware Resources as Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(2) : 11 -16 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.02.002
[1] 苹果iTunes U教育内容下载量超十亿[EB/OL].[2014-04-20]. http://www.cnbeta.com/articles/228050.htm.
[2] Loggie K, Barron A, Gulitz E, et al. Intellectual property and online courses: Policies at major research universities[J]. Quarterly Review of Distance Education,2007,8(2):109-125.
[3] Talab R. Faculty distance courseware ownership and the "Wal-Mart" approach to higher education[J]. TechTrends, 2007,51(4):9-12.
[4] 齐振国,汪琼. E- Learning 给我国高校教师带来的挑战[J].电化教育研究,2009(7):24-25.
[5] Wang Chang-hwa, Chen Cheng-ping. An analysis of factors influencing the user acceptance of openCourse ware[J]. Computer Applications for Database, Education, and Ubiquitous Computing Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2012,352:15-22.
[6] 冯晓光,肖玉坤,孙红玲. 高校教师课件的著作权分析[J].北京化工大学学报(社会科学版),2009(1):33-35.
[7] 余珊珊. 网络信息资源著作权保护问题研究[J].情报探索,2006(12):68-69.
[8] 陈传夫. 开放内容的类型及其知识产权管理[J].中国图书馆学报,2003(6):11-13.
[9] 《高等学校哲学社会科学研究学术规范(试行)[EB/OL].[2014-04-15]. http://www.edu.cn/20041118/3121016.shtml.
[10] 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020年)[EB/OL].[2014-04-16]. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.htmNational medium and long-term science and technology development plan.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
