Library and Information Service >
Study on Controller's Compensation Liability for Default on Personal Information
Received date: 2014-12-17
Revised date: 2015-01-07
Online published: 2015-01-20
[Purpose/significance] The goal of this paper is to build a mechanism on default liability of personal information controller, especially the compensation liability, and to provide a strong theoretical support for the legislation of the protection on the personal information resources, the reasonable collection and utilization on it. [Method/process] This paper adopts a series of analysis methods of literature, empirical, economic, system, normative and others .On the basis of attribute analysis on the personal information rights, starting from the relationship of contract in the collection and utilization behavior of personal information, with the composition, the imputation principle and the liability of personal information controller as the breakthrough point, this paper defines the scope of compensation, and finally puts forward the solution of default compensation standard. [Result/conclusion] Through the study, it finds that personal information resources has a typical dual attribute of property and personality rights; the relationship of collection and utilization on personal information has outstanding properties of the contract; the property rights have attribute of license fees, the default compensation the controller should pay include spiritual damages and property loss; the compensation standard should be divided into general default compensatory damages and punitive damages; the standard of compensation for spiritual damage should be propertied; the compensatory payment standard of property loss should include the whole loss; punitive damages standards should be 3-5 times as the compensatory. This paper puts forward the compensation scope of default liability, the solutions and methods of compensation standard which have strong rationality and operability.
Yang Xiaojiao . Study on Controller's Compensation Liability for Default on Personal Information[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(2) : 17 -24,43 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.02.003
[1] 陈飞.个人数据保护:欧盟指令及成员国法律、经合组织指导方针 (中英文对照)[M].北京:法律出版社,2006.
[2] 郭瑜.个人数据保护法研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012.
[3] 齐爱民.私法视野下的信息[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2012:1-5.
[4] 吴汉东,胡开忠.无形财产权制度研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2005:69.
[5] Kuner C.欧洲数据保护法——公司遵守与管制[M].旷野,杨会永,等译.北京:法律出版社,2008.
[6] Fried C. Privacy (A moral analysis)[J]. The Yale Law Journal, 1968(3):475-493.
[7] 郭明龙.个人信息权利的侵权法保护[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2012:130.
[8] 梁慧星.民法立法学说与判例研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1993:270.
[9] 杨立新.中国合同责任研究(上)[J].河南政法管理干部学院学报,2000,58(1):22-34.
[10] 程合红.商事人格权论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002:254.
[11] 姚辉.关于人格权商业化利用的若干问题[J].法学论坛,2011,26(6):10-16.
[12] 王利明,崔建远.合同法新论·总则[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997:52.
[13] European Commission. Decision 2001/497/EC: Standard Contractual Clauses (Clause 6)[EB/OL].[2014-01-08].http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/document/international-transfers/transfer/index_en.htm.
[14] Pinchaers J C S. From privacy toward a new intellectual property right in persona[M]. Hague: Kluwer Law International Press, 1966:65-66.
[15] 五十岚清.人格权法[M].铁木贤,葛敏,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009:150-151.
[16] 与贸易有关的知识产权协定(第三部分)[EB/OL].[2014-01-21]. http://www.sipo.gov.cn/zcfg/flfg/qt/gjty/200804/t20080403_369216.html.
[17] 戴维森.数据库的法律保护[M].朱理,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007:298.
[18] 杨立新.侵权法论[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2005:779.
[19] 张新宝.侵权责任构成研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:128.
[20] 曾世雄.损害普查法原理[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:118.
[21] 史尚宽.债法总论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998:91-92.
[22] 孙森淼.民法债编总论(上册)[M].台北:三民书局,2000:177.
[23] 王泽鉴.债法原理(二)——不当得利[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002:211-212.
[24] Huw-Beverley S, Ohly A, Lucas-Schloetter A. Privacy, property and personality: Civil law perspectives on commercial appropriation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005: 103-104.
[25] 李永军.从权利属性看人格权的法律保护[J].法商研究,2012,1(1):13-18.
[26] 于彦丽.论惩罚性违约损害赔偿的必要性及其适用条件[J].青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版),2003, 19(4):80-83.
[27] 杨立新.论消费者权益保护中的惩罚性赔偿金[M].杨立新.民法判解研究与适用(第四辑).北京:人民法院出版社,1999:107.
[28] 王利明.惩罚性损害赔偿[J].中国社会科学,2000,147(4):112-122.
[29] Punitive Damages Reform[EB/OL].[2014-03-21].http://www.atra.org/is-sues/punitive-damages-reform.
[30] 陈年冰,李乾.论网络环境下人格权侵权的惩罚性赔偿[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2013,30 (3): 105-111.
[31] 王利明.论网络环境下人格权的保护[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2012(4):1-7.
[32] Partlett D F. Punitive damages: Legal hot zones[J]. Louisiana Law Review, 1996, 56(4)781-823.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
