Library and Information Service >
Analysis of Construction and Characteristics of Scientific Collaboration Network of Universities—Based on the Data of "211" Universities
Received date: 2014-12-01
Revised date: 2015-01-05
Online published: 2015-01-20
[Purpose/significance] There are vast territories and numerous universities in China. It has important significance to understand the scientific cooperation among universities to promote the "2011 project". Based on all the data of SCI and SSCI database, this paper develops a new method of process data to solve the problem that in the traditional scientific metrology and the existing software can't deal with the huge amounts of data. This method is used to analyze the cooperation among different institutions.[Method/process] Taking all the "211" universities as the research object, this paper calculates, ranks and maps the cooperation network by quantitative research of SCI and SSCI high level papers collaboration of these universities. [Result/conclusion] By using social network analysis to analyze the position of universities in the thesis cooperation network from the macroscopic angle, this paper summarizes the present situation of the major universities in China: the "985"comprehensive universities have strong research capabilities rank higher while the remote universities which has strong disciplines rank lower; geographical proximity is the main elements, while disciplinary proximity secondary in the universities' collaboration. The characteristic provide the revelation to scientific and education management: "985"universities should play the leading role while the universities which have the regional advantage play the growth pole role; communicate widely under the "2011 project" framework of discipline.
Chai Yue , Liu Chen , Wang Xianwen . Analysis of Construction and Characteristics of Scientific Collaboration Network of Universities—Based on the Data of "211" Universities[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(2) : 82 -88 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.02.013
[1] Han Pu, Shi Jin, Li Xiaoyan, et al. International collaboration in LIS: Global trends and networks at the country and institution level[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(1): 53-72.
[2] Wang Xianwen, Xu Shenmeng, Wang Zhi, et al. International scientific collaboration of China: Collaborating countries, institutions and individuals[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(3): 885-894.
[3] He Tianwei. International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(3): 571-582.
[4] Narin F, Stevens K, Whitlow E. Scientific cooperation in Europeand the citation of multidomestically authored papers[J]. Scientometrics,1991, 21(3):313-323.
[5] Lancho Barrantes B S, Bote G, Vicente P, et al. Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(3): 481-489.
[6] Franceschet M. Collaboration in computer science: A network science approach[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(10): 1992-2012.
[7] Brner K, Penumarthy S, Meiss M, et al. Mapping the diffusion of scholarly knowledge among major US research institutions[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(3): 415-426.
[8] 王贤文, 丁堃, 朱晓宇. 中国主要科研机构的科学合作网络分析——基于 Web of Science 的研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011,28 (12):1806-1812.
[9] Kretschmer H. Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 60(3): 409-420.
[10] Newman M E J. Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks[M]//BenNaim E, Frauenfelder H, Toroczkai. Z Complex Networks.Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004: 337-370.
[11] Hou Haiyan, Kretschmer H, Liu Zeyuan. The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2): 189-202.
[12] Wang Xianwen, Xu Shenmeng, Liu Di, et al. The role of Chinese-American scientists in China-US scientific collaboration:A study in nanotechnology[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(3): 737-749.
[13] Bozeman B, Fay D, Slade C P. Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship:The-state-of-the-art[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2013, 38(1): 1-67.
[14] 梁立明,沙德春.985高校校际科学合作的强地域倾向[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,(11):112-116.
[15] 赵蓉英,温芳芳.科研合作与知识交流[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(20):6-11.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
