Library and Information Service >
History Impact Factor:A New Academic Journal Stock Assessment Index
Received date: 2014-11-13
Revised date: 2014-12-27
Online published: 2015-01-20
[Purpose/significance] Evaluation index of journals is the comprehensive reflection of journals in a perspective level, so it must be deepened and developed. This paper presents a new journal stock index-historical influence factor, which means the total cited frequency of journal divided by the published paper amount and then divided by running period. [Method/process] Taking technology management periodicals as an example, and based on Chinese Net database CNKI, this article uses correlation coefficient, cluster analysis and ridge regression for empirical study. [Result/conclusion] The result shows that history impact factor is an excellent journal evaluation index. Because it not only has the advantages of impact factor and H-index, but also overcomes the limitations of traditional periodicals, such as too little stock index, regardless the journals of time, regardless the number of periodicals. Historical influence factor does not consider the citation problems of journal itself and different citation database has great influence on historical influence factor. So in the specific application, it should exclude journal itself citations or choose other citation database according to needs.
Key words： history impact factor; academic journal; evaluation; stock
Yu Liping . History Impact Factor:A New Academic Journal Stock Assessment Index[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(2) : 89 -92 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.02.014
[1] Moed H F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(3):265-277.
[2] Kosmulski M. Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(3): 481-485.
[3] Bergstrom C T,West J D,et al.The Eigenfactor Metrics[J].The Journal of Neuroscience,2008,28(45):11433-11434.
[4] Markpin T, Boonradsamee B, Ruksinsut K,et al. Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database[J]. Scientometrics,2008,75(2): 251-261.
[5] Hirsch J.An Index to Quantify an Individual's Scientific Research Output[A].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2005,102 (46):16569-16572.
[6] Rousseau R. New developments related to the hirsch index[J]. Science focus,2006,1(4):23-2.
[7] 赵均. 学术期刊评价中被引量指标及其影响因素分析[J]. 现代出版,2013(4):64-70.
[8] 赵星,高小强. 期刊h型指数与论文数量和被引的关系实证[J]. 图书情报工作,2009,53(20):131-134.
[9] 汪跃春,胡敏. h 指数与发文量、篇均引文量关系模型的验证与评价[J]. 情报杂志,2011(10):49-54.
[10] 朱大明. 基于引证的科技期刊学术价值指数初探[J]. 科技管理研究,2012(14):61-63,73.
[11] 金碧辉,Rousseau R. R 指 数、AR 指 数 :h 指 数功能扩展的补充指标[J]. 科学观察,2007,2(3):1-8.
[12] 郭海鸥. 学术评价的新方法——h 指数及其应用分析[J]. 河南教育学院学报(自然科学版),2009,18(2),45-47.
[13] 俞立平 孙建红. 总被引频次用于科技评价的误区研究——兼谈科技评价的时间特性[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2014(6):829-832.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
