Library and Information Service >
The Preparation, Adoption and Revision of American Library Bill of Rights
Received date: 2015-01-04
Revised date: 2015-02-05
Online published: 2015-02-20
[Purpose/significance] The American Library Association's Library Bill of Rights is the very core of the policies on library rights and intellectual freedom. Research on the procedure of policy revision could not only boost our recent discussion on library right but also benefit the reformation of Chinese library policy development.[Method/process] Adopting the methods of policy analysis and history research, the paper compares eight versions of policy texts and analysis their difference with related policy materials.[Result/conclusion] Based on the text analysis, the paper classifies four types of emend manners, participators' role and emendatory procedure in three scenes which are extensive amendment, minor amendment and repudiated amendment. Then it goes on to discover how the social environment influences the ALA to prepare, adopt and revise the policies on library rights and intellectual freedom, and how the ALA holds its ground on the freedom and equity of information and library service as professional positions by its library policies.
Zhang Jing , Xiao Peng . The Preparation, Adoption and Revision of American Library Bill of Rights[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(4) : 12 -19 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.04.002
[1] 程焕文, 潘燕桃, 张靖. 图书馆权利研究[M]. 北京: 学习出版社, 2011: 9-36.
[2] 王静芬. 美国《图书馆权利法案》的历史演变及其特点[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2014(5): 121-126.
[3] 程焕文. 图书馆权利的界定[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2010(2): 38-45.
[4] 范并思. 权利、读者权利和图书馆权利[J]. 图书馆, 2013(2): 1-4.
[5] 张靖. ALA《图书馆权利法案》的自由精神[J]. 图书与情报, 2005(2): 12-15, 36.
[6] 郭晓敏. 从《图书馆权利法案》阐释的制定与修订看ALA政策制定的程序[J]. 情报资料工作, 2011(3): 46-49.
[7] The Office for Intellectual Freedom of the American Library Association. Intellectual freedom manual[M]. Chicago: American Library Association, 2010: 49-89.
[8] Robinson B A.1996 U.S. Supreme Court Ruling (Romer v. Evans)overturning an anti-gay amendment 2 in Colorado[EB/OL].[2014-11-20]. http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_laws7.htm.
[9] 张靖. IFLA、ALA与知识自由[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2009(12): 84-88, 46.
[10] ALA. About ALA[EB/OL]. [2014-07-24]. http://www.ala.org/aboutala/.
[11] 曼彻斯特.光荣与梦想:1932-1972年美国社会实录[M].广州外国语学院美英问题研究室翻译组,朱协,译.海口:海南出版社,三环出版社,2004:77-78.
[12] 德比希尔.哈金森历史辞典[M].朱渊, 蔡虹,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2008:112.
[13] The trustees of the city library.Upon the objects to be attained by the establishment of a public library: Report of the trustees of the Public Library of the City of Boston[R/OL].[2014-04-04].http://www.scls.lib.wi.us/mcm/history/report_of_trustees.html.
[14] 张维平, 马立武. 美国教育法研究[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社,2004:182-193.
[15] ALA/Special Committee on Civil Liberties. Report of the Special Committee on Civil Liberties adopted at the midwinter 1961 meeting[J]. AlA Bulletin,1961,55(6): 486-487.
[16] 程焕文.图书馆权利与道德[M].张靖,编译.桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2007:前言.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
