Library and Information Service >
Research on Two-stage Dynamic Performance Evaluation of University Libraries
Received date: 2015-03-12
Revised date: 2015-03-22
Online published: 2015-04-05
[Purpose/significance] Under the current development background of collaborative innovation, how to implement a strong support to the institution for teaching and scientific research, to provide users with the required knowledge service will become an important part of the performance evaluation of university libraries. [Method/process] From the output perspective of information service and academic achievements, the university library's service process is divided into two sub-systems succeeding each other, building a two-stage evaluation model, two-stage performance changes of 22 key Chinese university libraries from 2010 to 2013 are analyzed. [Result/conclusion] The results show that the two-stage level of overall efficiency of the university libraries is low. The university libraries can be divided into four types based on change trends of two-stage TFP performance. This provides a visual performance recognition mode of university libraries, and highlights the information reference value of management decision.
Key words： university library; two-stage DEA; Malmquist index; performance evaluation
Li Jianxia . Research on Two-stage Dynamic Performance Evaluation of University Libraries[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(7) : 61 -68 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.07.008
[1] Easun M S. Identifying efficiencies in resource management:An application of data envelopment analysis to selected school libraries in California [D]. Berkeley:University of California, 1992.
[2] Chen Tser-yieth. A measurement of the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 1997, 53(1):71-80.
[3] Shim W. Applying DEA technique to library evaluation in academic research libraries [J]. Library Trends, 2003, 51(3):312-332.
[4] Reichmann G, Sommersguter-Reichman M. University library benchmarking: An international comparison using DEA [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 100(1):131-147.
[5] Noh Y. Evaluation of the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries using DEA techniques and a proposal of alternative evaluation variables [J]. Library Hi Tech, 2011, 29(4):697-724.
[6] Shahwan T M, Kaba A. Efficiency analysis of GCC academic libraries: An application of data envelopment analysis [J]. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 2013, 14(3):197-210.
[7] 白首晏. DEA方法在高校图书馆效率评价中的应用[J]. 情报杂志, 2002(6):16-17.
[8] 范红霞, 刘泽隆. 高校图书馆资源使用效率测定的DEA模型分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2008(4):157-158.
[9] 李建霞. 运用数据包络分析我国高校图书馆服务效率[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008, 44(5):124-132.
[10] 闫现洋, 余小萍. 基于DEA方法的高校图书馆学科馆员服务绩效评价研究——基于西南大学图书馆学科馆员的实证分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011, 34(2):88-92.
[11] 杨小丽. 基于DEA的高校图书馆效率评价[J]. 情报探索, 2014(3):113-116.
[12] 向远媛, 温国强. 大学图书馆成效评估及其指标体系构建探索[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2011(3):11-16,21.
[13] 武立新. 基于BSC的研究型大学图书馆绩效综合评价[J]. 情报杂志, 2008(1):151-154.
[14] 马勇, 李思英. 基于BSC的高校图书馆绩效评价研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2010(4):104-107.
[15] 黄金霞. 解读2010年美国学术型图书馆的十大发展趋势——以美国康奈尔大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(1):93-96.
[16] 刘颖, 唐永林, 陈荣. 高校图书馆学术影响力评价研究——以39所"985"高校图书馆为例[J]. 情报探索, 2012(3):4-7.
[17] Fare R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach [J]. Economics Letters, 1996,50(1):65-70.
[18] Fare R, Grosskopf S. Network DEA [J]. Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 2000, 34(1):35-49.
[19] 叶胡, 宋伟,赵嘉茜, 等. 基于两阶段集中式CCR-DEA模型的科技政策绩效评估分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2012(12):27-33.
[20] 苏屹, 喻登科, 李柏洲. 基于改进DEA的我国高技术企业技术创新绩效研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2012, 33(6):71-76.
[21] Easun M S. Beginner's guide to efficiency measurement [J]. School Library Media Quarterly, 1994, 22(2):103-106.
[22] 高淑怡. 建立以服务为标准的高校图书馆评估指标体系[J]. 河北经贸大学学报(综合版), 2004(2):92-94.
[23] 杨勇. 论高校图书馆的评估及其指标体系的改进[J]. 高校图书馆工作, 2009(1):52-53,92.
[24] 池晓波. 高校图书馆效益评价体系分析[J]. 图书与情报, 2010(6):53-56.
[25] Childers T, Van House N A. Dimensions of public library effectiveness [J]. Library and Information Science Research, 1989, 11(4):273-301.
[26] 郭国峰, 郑召锋. 我国中部六省文化产业发展绩效评价与研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2009(12):80-81.
[27] 袁海, 周哓唯. 我国公共图书馆效率动态变化——基于省际面板数据的Malmquist指数分析[J]. 图书馆建设, 2011(8):77-81.
[28] 王家庭, 李海燕. 我国公共文化服务事业全要素生产率的动态研究——以图书馆业为例[J]. 图书馆建设, 2013(1):5-10.
[29] 柯平, 朱明, 闫娜. 国外图书馆管理研究述评[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2013, 39(5):83-97.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
