Library and Information Service >
Research Review on Users' Information Behaviors of Mobile Social Apps
Received date: 2015-04-24
Revised date: 2015-05-04
Online published: 2015-05-20
[Purpose/significance]Mobile social apps, which place the first in the usage rate and scale of mobile apps, have brought the vital influences on users' online behaviors. It is useful to make the research review on users' online behaviors of mobile social apps., It can help researches to understand the research progress, thus go further to reveal the behavior pattern of mobile social apps.[Method/process]Based on the lifecycle of mobile social apps, this paper systematically summarizes the research on behaviors of accepting, using, transferring and quitting, and makes a comparison between domestic and overseas research in terms of research contents and methods.[Result/conclusion]The research about adaption motivations and intention of mobile social apps has been analyzed numerously. However, the differences between users' behaviors in different mobile social apps and the negative behavior of usage in mobile social apps are still at an initial stage, which are the research trends in this area.
Key words: mobile internet; mobile social application; user behavior
Li Li , Ding Ning . Research Review on Users' Information Behaviors of Mobile Social Apps[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(10) : 137 -144 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.10.020
[1] 工业与信息化部电信研究院. 移动互联网白皮书[EB/OL]. [2015-04-04]. http://www.catr.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/201405/t20140512_1017472.html.
[2] GSMA. The Mobile Economy 2015[EB/OL]. [2015-04-04]. https://gsmaintelligence.com/research/?file=08bd184710b7e671e80cfe6693cead2d&download.
[3] CNNIC.第35次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL]. [2015-04-04]. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/201502/P020150203551802054676.pdf.
[4] CNNIC.2013-2014移动互联网发展报告[EB/OL]. [2015-04-04]. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/201408/P020140826366265178976.pdf.
[5] CNNIC.2014 年中国社交类应用用户行为研究报告[EB/OL]. [2015-04-24]. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/sqbg/201408/P020150401351309648557.pdf.
[6] Webster J,Watson R. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2002, 26(2) : xiii-xxiii.
[7] 赵国锋, 李兵, 徐川. 移动社交网的生命周期评估模型研究[J].计算机学报, 2013, 36(4): 727-737.
[8] Nikou S, Bouwman H. Ubiquitous use of mobile social network service[J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2014,31(3): 422-433.
[9] Cui Yangqi, Wang Li. Motivations for accessing social networking services on mobile devices[C]// Proceedings of the International Working Conference.New York:ACM, 2012: 636-639.
[10] Sanz-Blas S, Ruiz-Mafé C, Martí-Parreo J, et al. Assessing the influence of motivations and attitude on mobile social networking use[J]. Global Business Perspectives, 2013(1):164-179.
[11] Zhou Tao, Li Hongxiu. Understanding mobile SNS continuance usage in China from the perspectives of social influence and privacy concern [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 37: 283-289.
[12] Lien C, Cao Yang. Examining WeChat users' motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from China[J].Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 41:104-111.
[13] 张利, 王欢. 我国当前移动社交网络用户的基本特征[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 29(5): 119-123.
[14] 李彦娜. 关于移动社交网络的用户行为影响因素研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2012.
[15] 赵卓鹤. 移动互联网社交应用软件使用意愿影响因素实证研究——以"微信"为例[D].济南:山东大学, 2014.
[16] 艾博. 手机微博用户参与强度影响因素实证研究[D]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2014.
[17] 刘忠园. 移动社交网络用户的使用动机和行为研究[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2014.
[18] Zhao Ling, Lu Yaobin, Zhang Long, et al. Assessing the effects of service quality and justice on customer satisfaction and the continuance intention of mobile value-added services: An empirical test of a multidimensional model[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2012, 52(3): 645-656.
[19] Zhou Tao, Lu Yaobin. Examining mobile instant messaging user loyalty from the perspectives of network externalities and flow experience [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(2): 883-889.
[20] Zhou Tao, Li Hong, Liu Yong. The effect of flow experience on mobile SNS users' loyalty[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2010,110(6): 930-946.
[21] 詹恂, 严星. 微信用户持续使用意向影响因素及使用与满足研究[J]. 新媒体研究,2014(11): 130-134.
[22] 黄贺方. 移动社交网络用户持续使用意向影响因素研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2012.
[23] 李倩,侯碧海. 基于DM和ECM-IT的移动社交网络用户持续使用意图研究[J]. 信息系统学报, 2014(12): 50- 59.
[24] Joinson A. 'Looking at', 'Looking up' or 'Keeping up with' People? Motives and Uses of Facebook[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08).Florence:ACM,2008:1027-1036.
[25] Pi S, Chou Chen-Huei, Liao Hsiu-Li. A study of Facebook groups members' knowledge sharing[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(5):1971-1979.
[26] Kisekka V, Bagchi-Sen S, Rao H. Extent of private information disclosure on online social networks: An exploration of Facebook mobile phone users [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(6): 2722-2729.
[27] Roman D. Constant connectivity, selective participation:Mobile-social interaction of students and faculty[C]//CHI EA'10.Atlanta:ACM,2010:4333-4338.
[28] Sagioglou C, Greitemeyer T. Facebook's emotional consequences: Why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 35: 359-363.
[29] 王茹, 谷月. 移动网络和社交网站对大学生思想行为模式的影响分析——基于中国石油大学(北京)的调查[J]. 高校辅导员学刊, 2013, 5(2):88-93.
[30] 张青青, 刘佳音.微信用户日常生活信息获取行为研究[J].情报探索, 2015(1):75-78.
[31] 唐嘉仪.社交媒体使用与大学生幸福感关系:对比 QQ 空间和新浪微博[D].广州:中山大学,2014.
[32] 常俪. 关于移动社交对日常活动空间影响的实证研究——基于对手机用户的调查数据[J]. 广告大观(理论版), 2013(6): 77-87.
[33] Davenport S, Bergman S, Bergman J, et al. Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 32: 212-220.
[34] Hughes D, Rowe M, Batey M, et al. A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, 28(2): 561-569.
[35] Shen Jianqiang, Brdiczka O, Ruan Y. A comparison study of user behavior on Facebook and Gmail [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(6): 2650-2655.
[36] 李琼.角色转换与身份认同:不同社会化媒体对个体行为的影响——以微博与微信为例[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2014.
[37] Kwon S, Park E, Kim K. What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter [J]. The Social Science Journal, 2014, 51(4): 534-544.
[38] Li Xiaoqian, Chen Wenhong. Facebook or Renren? A comparative study of social networking site use and social capital among Chinese international students in the United States[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 35:116-123.
[39] Li Cong. A tale of two social networking sites: How the use of Facebook and Renren influences Chinese consumers' attitudes toward product packages with different cultural symbols[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 32: 162-170.
[40] 汤芮.中美社交网站传播中用户忠诚度对比研究——以人人网和Facebook为例[D].北京:北京印刷学院, 2014.
[41] 蒋艳. 微信与微博比较研究:基于5W模式视角[D].广州:暨南大学,2014.
[42] 梁玉麒. 中国社交媒体用户社会资本状况对网络口碑行为的影响[D].厦门:厦门大学,2014.
[43] 马莉婷.移动互联网用户对社交网络服务平台的偏好分类模型研究[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2014(4):193-197.
[44] Ljepava N, Orr R, Locke S, et al. Personality and social characteristics of Facebook non-users and frequent users[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(4): 1602-1607.
[45] Ryan T, Xenos S. Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the big five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, 27(5): 1658-1664.
[46] Sheldon P. Profiling the nonusers: Examination of life-position indicators, sensation seeking, shyness, and loneliness among users and nonusers of social networking sites [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012,28(5): 1960-1965.
[47] Kwak H, Chun H, Moon S. Fragile online relationship: A first look at unfollow dynamics in Twitter[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Vancouver BC:ACM,2011:1091-1100.
[48] Baker R, White K. In their own words: Why teenagers don't use social networking sites[J]. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2010, 14(6): 395-398.
[49] 邓胜利, 杨丽娜. 用户个性特征对信息行为影响的研究进展[J].情报理论与实践, 2014,37(5):119-123.
[50] Choi J, Jung J, Lee S. What causes users to switch from a local to a global social network site? The cultural, social, economic, and motivational factors of Facebook's globalization [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(6): 2665-2673.
[51] Zhang K, Lee M, Cheung C, et al. Understanding the role of gender in bloggers' switching behavior[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2009, 47(4): 540-546.
[52] Wu Yun-Lung, Tao Yu-Hui, Li Ching-Pu, et al. User-switching behavior in social network sites: A model perspective with drill-down analyses [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014,33: 92-103.
[53] 魏登柏,李晶,尹敬刚.网络信息交流方式转移研究: 从即时通信到社交网络[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(3):42-46.
[54] 曹雄飞.理解博客用户向微博的转移:基于推-拉-锚定框架的视角[D].合肥:中国科技大学,2014.
[55] Ravindran T, Kuan A, Lian D. Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(11): 2306–2320.
[56] Dindar M, Akbulut Y. Why do pre-service teachers quit Facebook? An investigation on ‘quitters forever’ and ‘quitters for a while’ [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 39: 170-176.
[57] 范钧,林涛,聂津君.虚拟社区成员知识共享行为退出意向的影响因素研究[J].浙商管理评论, 2014(1):195- 207.
[58] 徐晓娟, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华,等. 社交网站中用户流失的理论探讨与实证分析[J].信息系统学报, 2013(2): 83-97.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |