Library and Information Service >
Review on Social Impact Assessment of Scientific Research
Received date: 2015-05-26
Revised date: 2015-06-24
Online published: 2015-07-20
[Purpose/significance] Combing the related theory models and indicator systems is benefit to promote the establishment of social impact assessment system for scientific research, and optimize the effectiveness of scientific research management policies.[Method/process] Based on the articles of scientific research social impact in web of science, Google scholar and CNKI, the paper reviews the evaluation paradigm, theoretical model, evaluation method and index system.[Result/conclusion] Results-oriented and process-oriented are two main paradigms of research social impact assessment. Multidimensional model, SIAMPI model, payback model, communication model, and logic model are five key assessment models. The evaluation index system is constructed from perspectives of formation conditions and results. In the context of innovation-driven development, the research social impact evaluation should adhere to the value orientation that science services to the society, strengthen and optimize the operability and quantitative measurement of research evaluation indicator system, mine and integrate the multiple data of research social impact.
Wang Qian , Tan Zongying , Qian Li . Review on Social Impact Assessment of Scientific Research[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(14) : 143 -148 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.14.020
[1] 丁翔宇.指标:让科研行为有理有据[J].世界科学,2014(9):12.
[2] 张洁.研究影响力:有成果才有基金[J].世界科学,2014(9):17.
[3] Meyer M S,Tang P. Exploring the "value" of academic patents:IP management practices in UK universities and their implications for Third-Stream indicators[J].Scientometrics,2007,70(2):415-440.
[4] Van der Meulen B, Rip A. Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands[J]. Research Evaluation, 2000,9(1):11-25.
[5] Bozeman B, Sarewitz D. Public value mapping and science policy evaluation[J]. Minerva, 2011, 49(1):1-23.
[6] Holbrook J B, Frodeman R. Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(3):239-246.
[7] Donovan C. State of the art in assessing research impact:Introduction to a special issue[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011,20(3):175-179.
[8] Bornmann L. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(2):217-233.
[9] Frank C, Nason E. Health research:Measuring the social, health and economic benefits[J]. Canadian Medical Association Journal,2009, 180(5):528-534.
[10] Sutherl W J, Goulson D, Potts S G.et al. Quantifying the impact and relevance of scientific research[J]. PLoS ONE,2011, 6(11):1-10.
[11] Upton S, Vallance P, Goddard J. From outcomes to process:Evidence for a new approach to research impact assessment[J].Research Evaluation,2014,23(4):352-365.
[12] Milat A, Bauman A, Redman S.A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods[J].Health Research Policy and Systems,2015,13(18):1-7.
[13] Banzi R, Moja L, Pistotti V, et al. Conceptual frameworks and empirical approaches used to assess the impact of health research:An overview of reviews[J]. Health Research Policy and Systems,2011,9(26):1-10.
[14] RQF Development Advisory Group. Research Quality Framework:Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia[R/OL].[2015-04-12]. http://www.csu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/51472/rqf_issuespaper.pdf.
[15] Expert Group on Assessment of University-based Research.Assessing Europe's university-based research[R].Brussels:Publications Office of the European Union,2010:41-42.
[16] REF2014. Decisions on assessing research impact[EB/OL].[2015-04-12]. http://www.ref.ac.uk/pubs/2011-01/.
[17] Molas-Gallart J, Saiter A, Patel P,et al. Measuring third stream activities:Final report to the Russell Group of Universities[R]. Btighton:Science and Technology Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex,2002.
[18] Xu F, Li X X, Meng W, et al.Ranking academic impact of world national research institutes-By the Chinese Academy of Sciences[J]. Research Evaluation,2013,22(5):337-350.
[19] Buxton M, Hanney S. How can payback from health services research be assessed?[J].Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1996,1(1):35-43.
[20] Klautzer L, Hanney S, Nason E, et al. Assessing policy and practice impacts of social science research:The application of the Payback Framework to assess the Future of Work programme[J]. Research Evaluation ,2011,20(3):201-209.
[21] Scott J E, Blasinsky M, Dufour M, et al. An evaluation of the Mind-Body Interactions and Health Program:Assessing the impact of an NIH program using the Payback Framework[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011,20(3):185-192.
[22] Spaapen J, Van Drooge L. Introducing 'productive interactions' in social impact Assessment[J].Research Evaluation,2011, 20(3):211-218.
[23] Molas-Gallart J,Tang P. Tracing 'productive interactions' to identify social impacts:An example from the social sciences[J].Research Evaluation,2011,20(3):219-226.
[24] Jong S, Barker K, Cox D. Understanding societal impact through productive interactions:ICT research as a case[J]. Research Evaluation,2014,23(2):89-102.
[25] Wolf B, Lindenthal T, Szerencsits M. Evaluating research beyond scientific impact:How to include criteria for productive interactions and impact on practice and society[J].GAIA,2013,22(2):104-114.
[26] Ark G.Societal impact evaluation of research groups:The communication metaphor[EB/OL].[2015-03-02].http://www.vr.se/download/18.34261071168fe6a62080001004/ZonMw+van+Ark+2.pdf.
[27] Mostert S, Ellenbroek S, Meijer I, et al. Societal output and use of research performed by health research groups[J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2010, 8(30):1-10.
[28] Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada[J]. Research Policy,2001,30(2):333-349.
[29] Landry R, Lamari M, Amara N.The extent and determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies[J]. Public Administration Review,2003,63(2):192-205.
[30] Wiek A A, Talwar S S,O'Shea M,et al. Toward a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability research[J]. Research Evaluation,2014,23(2):117-132.
[31] Bornmann L, Marx W.How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(4):211-219.
[32] 邱均平,余厚强.基于影响力产生模型的替代计量指标分层研究[J].情报杂志,2015,34(5):53-58.
[33] Zellner C. The economic effects of basic research:Evidence for embodied knowledge transfer via scientists' migration[J]. Research Policy, 2003,32(10):1881-1895.
[34] Salter A J, Martin B R. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research:A critical review[J].Research Policy,2001,30(3):509-532.
[35] Roessner D, Bond J, Okubo S, et al. The economic impact of licensed commercialized inventions originating in university research[J]. Research Policy,2013,42(1):23-34.
[36] Desmarais B, Hird J. Public policy's bibliography:The use of research in us regulatory impact analyses[J].Regulation & Governance, 2014,8(4):497-510.
[37] 曾天山,高宝立.我国教育科研成果现状及其影响力分析[J].教育研究,2009(8):11-19.
[38] 谭春辉.我国普通高校科技创新社会影响力的测度——基于2000-2007年国家科技奖励三大奖项的统计分析[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(5):122-125.
[39] 卫垌圻,谭宗颖.Altmetrics国内外研究中的问题与挑战[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(2):93-99.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
