Library and Information Service >
Assessment Framework, Method and Evaluation of International Computer and Information Literacy
Received date: 2015-07-09
Revised date: 2015-07-24
Online published: 2015-08-05
In response to the information literacy requirements of global citizens in the digital age, the International Association for the Evaluation of Education Achievement launched the first students' information literacy transnational large-scale comparative study in 2013. Through interpreting the information literacy assessment framework, this paperaims to dig the necessity for international students' information literacy assessment and analysesthe influencing factors leading to the differences of students' information literacy levels, to provide a useful reference for the evaluation of students' information literacyand makeinformation literacy guidance in the right direction in China. Usingthe methods of literature research and comparative analysis,itcompares and analyses the content framework, background frame, evaluation object, evaluation tool, evaluation method and evaluationresultof students' information literacy assessment. This research resultsreflect the distinctive characteristics of the times and provides information literacy standards for Chineseand foreign high school students. It should paymoreattention to information literacy background, and emphasizes on information technology as a discipline but not just as a tool, to promote the development of national information literacy education.
Tang Xiaoling . Assessment Framework, Method and Evaluation of International Computer and Information Literacy[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(15) : 12 -19,121 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.15.002
[1] Amtmann R, Poindexter S. Literacy in information and communication technology: Standards and practices of secondary schools[J]. International Journal of Learning, 2008, 15 (5):281-290.
[2] European Commission. Digital Literacy European Commission working paper and recommendations from Digital Literacy High-Level Expert Group [EB/OL]. [2015-06-24]. http://www.ifap.ru/library/book386.pdf.
[3] Hoedl E. Europe 2020 Strategy and European Recovery (Strategia Europa 2020 I Europejska Odbudowa)[J]. Problemy Ekorozwoju-Problems of Sustainable Development, 2011, 6(2): 11-18.
[4] Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. Developing the landscape for 14-19 learning[EB/OL]. [2015-06-02]. http://www.qca.org.uk/6.html.
[5] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries[J]. OECD, 2009, 41 (12):1-33.
[6] Bakia M, Murphy R, Anderson K, et al. International experiences with technology in education: Final report[R]. Washington, DC:US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, 2011.
[7] Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). National Assessment Program—ICT literacy: Years 6 & 10 report[R].Sydney: Ministerial Council for Education Early Childhood Development & Youth Affairs, 2012.
[8] Bawden D. Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2001, 57(2):218-259.
[9] Fraillon J, Schulz W, Ainley J. International computer and information literacy study: Assessment framework[R]. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, 2013.[2015-07-04], http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED545260
[10] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). PISA 2009 results: Students on line: Vol. 6. Digital technologies and performance[R]. Paris: OECD Publications, 2011.
[11] Group P. PIAAC Literacy: A conceptual framework[R]. OECD publishing, 2009.[2015-07-05]. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530712.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
